Abstract
This work presents the study of the behavior of the internal flow in a swirl bipropellant injector, which is composed of an open-end (without nozzle) and a closed injector (with nozzle). In this way, each of these injectors has a characteristic behavior with respect to velocity distribution, pressure, and other main parameters. In this study, three methods are used, which are: experimental, numerical, and analytical. For the numerical simulation was used a three-dimensional structured mesh, capable of holding three important areas: the oxidizer swirl chamber (closed swirl injector), the fuel swirl chamber (open-end swirl injector), and the area designed for the spray zone, which will include the phenomena caused by the interaction of the flow of the oxidant and the fuel within the bipropellant injector. The simulation was carried out through the commercial code CFD fluent in permanent regime, using the RNG k-epsilon turbulent model and the volume of fluid multiphase model to locate the liquid–gas interface. In addition, experimental data and a mathematical model developed based on theories of Abramovich and Kliachko are also presented .
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Geometrical characteristics parameter of the tangential swirl injector
- A c :
-
Geometrical characteristics parameter of the conical swirl injector
- A E :
-
Equivalent geometrical characteristics parameter of the swirl injectors
- C d :
-
Discharge coefficient
- D h :
-
Hydraulic diameter
- f :
-
Volumetric forces
- f p :
-
Cross-sectional area of inlet port
- K :
-
Coefficient of loss due to liquid viscosity
- L mix :
-
Distance between nozzle injectors
- n :
-
Number of inlet ports
- N :
-
Total number of phases
- \({\dot{m}}\) :
-
Mass flow rate
- P :
-
Pressure
- ΔP :
-
Differential pressure
- R s :
-
Swirl chamber radius
- R inj :
-
Radius to axis inlet channel
- r a :
-
Air core radius
- r o :
-
Outlet orifice radius
- t :
-
Film thickness, ro–ra
- u :
-
Vectorial velocity
- U in :
-
Inlet entrance velocity
- U, W :
-
Velocities
- α :
-
Half-spray angle
- β :
-
Swirl angle
- ξ :
-
Losses coefficient
- φ :
-
Film flow area coefficient
- γ :
-
Tilt angle
- λ :
-
Resistance coefficient of Blasius
- μ :
-
Liquid absolute viscosity
- \(\nabla\) :
-
Gradient operator
- ψ :
-
Helix angle
- ρ :
-
Liquid density
- σ :
-
Liquid surface tension
- ν :
-
Liquid kinematic viscosity
- χ :
-
Volume fraction of fluid
- a:
-
Air core
- eq:
-
Equivalent parameter due to viscosity
- inj:
-
Parameters of inlet ports
- p:
-
Inlet ports
- r:
-
Radial component
- s:
-
Swirl chamber
- tot:
-
Total
- θ :
-
Tangential component
- z :
-
Axial component
References
Abramovich GN (1944) The theory of swirl atomizers. Industrial Aerodynamics, BNT ZAGI, Moscow
Abramovich GN (1976) Applied gas dynamics. Nauka, Moscow
Bazarov V, Yang V (2004) Design and dynamics of jet and swirl injectors. Prog Astronaut Aeronaut 200:19–103
Chinn JJ (2009) An appraisal of swirl atomizer inviscid flow analysis, part 1: the principle of maximum flow for a swirl atomizer and its use in the exposition and comparison of early flow analyses. Atom Sprays 19:263–282
Chu C-C, Chou S-F, Lin H-I, Liann Y-H (2008) An experimental investigation of swirl atomizer sprays. Heat Mass Transf 45:11–22
Giffen E, Muraszew A (1953) Atomization of liquid fuels. Chapman and Hall, London
Hirt CW, Nichols BD (1981) Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39:201–225
Hinckel JN, Villa Nova HF, Bazarov VG (2008) CFD analysis of swirl atomizers. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit
Kessaev K, Kupatenkov VD (1997) Injectors design for liquid rocket engines. Book of Fundamental Course in Engine Design, SP-São José dos Campos, CTA/IAE/ASA-P, pp 31–49
Kim D, Im J-H, Koh H, Yoon Y (2007) Effect of ambient gas density on spray characteristics of swirling liquid sheets. J Propul Power 23(3):603–611
Khavkin YI (2004) The theory and practice of swirl atomizers. CRC Press, New York
Lefebvre AH (1989) Atomization and sprays. Hemisphere, New York
Patankar SV (1980) Numerical heat transfer and mass transfer. Hemisphere, New York
Reddy KU, Mishra DP (2008) Studies on spray behavior of pressure swirl atomizer in transition regime. J Propul Power 24:74–80
Rivas JRR (2009) Estudo e simulação numérica do escoamento no interior de um injetor centrífugo cônico. MSc thesis, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, Brazil
Rivas JRR (2015) Modelo matemático e simulação numérica da atomização de líquidos em injetores centrífugos de uso aeroespacial. PhD thesis, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, Brazil
Rivas JR, Pimenta AP, Rivas GR (2014) Development of a mathematical model and 3D numerical simulation of the internal flow in a conical swirl atomizer. J At Sprays 24(2):97–114
Rubinsky VR (1994) Combustion instability in the RD-0110 engine. AIAA, Washington, pp 89–112
Schafer M (2006) Computational engineering—introduction to numerical methods. Springer, Berlin
Souza JRP (2001) Estudo de um injetor centrífugo bipropelente utilizado em motor foguete a propelente líquido. MSc thesis, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, Brazil
Taylor G (1948) The mechanism of swirl atomizers. In: Proceedings of the 7th international congress for applied mechanics, London, vol 2
Wehmann CF (2010) Caracterização do funcionamento de um injetor centrífugo bipropelente. PhD thesis, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, São José Dos Campos
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the following institutions which have contributed to the development of this work: Technological Institute of Aeronautics, ITA, and its Propulsion and Power Laboratory, as well as the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, CAPES, for the financial support through all these years of study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Technical Editor: Jader Barbosa Jr.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rivas, J.R.R., Pimenta, A.P., Salcedo, S.G. et al. Study of internal flow of a bipropellant swirl injector of a rocket engine. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 289 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1205-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1205-6