3D finite element analysis of slot milling of unidirectional glass fiber reinforced polymer composites

  • C. Prakash
  • K. S. Vijay Sekar
Technical Paper


The applications of glass fiber reinforced polymer composite materials are increasing in many industries, such as automobile, aerospace, construction, marine, and defense. The slot milling is an important machining operation to reduce the excess material and to bring the component to the required final shape and size. However, machining the glass fiber reinforced polymer composite laminate is still challenging due to its non-homogeneity and anisotropic properties. In this research, 3D finite element model is developed using ABAQUS/explicit to investigate the cutting forces, chip formation process, and the laminate failure modes. The material model is created using Autodesk HELIUS PFA and the 3D Hashin’s criteria are incorporated to characterize the failure modes. The finite element model effectively analyzes the interaction between tool and laminate, to evaluate the possible failure modes of the GFRP laminate, effects of cutting forces for different cutting speeds, and feed rates during the slot milling process. Moreover, the finite element simulation results are validated by comparing with the experimental results and the literature. From the investigation, it is found that the effect of cutting speed and feed rate involves more in the chip characteristics, which is confirmed with the scanning electron microscope images of the milled chips. The chips obtained are mostly discontinuous fractured chips in powder form with fiber pullout and delaminated fibers.


GFRP Slot milling Cutting forces Chip formation SEM 3D finite element model 


  1. 1.
    Alaiji R, Lasri L, Bouayad A (2015) 3D finite element modelling of chip formation and induced damage in machining of fiber reinforced composites. Am J Eng Res 4(7):123–132Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Phadnis VA, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2012) Finite element analysis of drilling in carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. IOP Publishing. J Phys Conf Ser 382(2012):012014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dhawan V, Debnath K (2016) Prediction of forces during drilling of composite laminates using artificial neural network: a new approach. FME Transact 44(1):36–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soldani X, Santiuste C, Muñoz-Sánchez A, Miguélez M (2011) Influence of tool geometry and numerical parameters when modeling orthogonal cutting of LFRP composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 42(9):1205–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oğuz ÇOLAK, Talha SUNAR (2016) Cutting forces and 3D surface analysis of CFRP milling with PCD cutting tools. Elsevier Proc CIRP 45:75–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghafarizadeh S, Chatelain J-F, Lebrun G (2016) Finite element analysis of surface milling of carbon fiber-reinforced composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:399–409. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheikh-Ahmad JY (2009) Machining of polymer composites. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giasin K, Ayyar-Soberanis S, French T, Padnis V (2016) 3D finite element modelling of cutting forces in drilling fibre Metal laminates and experimental hole quality analysis. Appl Compos Mater. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Azmi AI (2013) Chip formation studies in machining fibre reinforced polymer composites. Int J Mater Prod Technol 46(1):32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lasri L, Nouari M, el Mansori M (2009) Modelling of chip separation in machining unidirectional FRP composites by stiffness degradation concept. Compos Sci Technol 69(5):684–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    He YL, Liu YL, Gao JG (2015) Macro and micro models of milling of carbon fiber reinforced plastics using fem. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Engineering (AIIE 2015). Atlantis Press. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Isbilir O, Ghassemieh E (2013) Three-dimensional numerical modelling of drilling of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites. J Compos Mater. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chakladar ND, Pal SK, Mandal P (2012) Drilling of woven glass fiber-reinforced plastic-an experimental and finite element study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simulia D (2014) Abaqus 6.14 User’s manual. Dassault systems, Providence, RI.
  15. 15.
    Autodesk (2016) Autodesk Helius PFA 2016/HELP, Autodesk Knowledge Network.
  16. 16.
    CATIA V5R14 (2014) User Manual, Dassault systems. Providence, RI.
  17. 17.
    Hashin Z (1980) Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites. J Appl Mech 47:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krishnamurthy R, Santhanakrishnan G, Malhotra SK (1992) Machining of polymeric composites. In: Proceedings of the Machining of Composites Materials Symposium. ASM Materials Week. Chicago, Illinois, pp 139–148Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vijay Sekar KS, Pradeep Kumar M (2011) Finite element simulations of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy machining to assess material model parameters of the Johnson-Cook constitutive equation. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 33(2):203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Phadnis VA, Makhdum F, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2013) Drilling in carbon/epoxy composites: experimental investigations and finite element implementation. Compos Part A 47:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li C, Lai X, Li H, Ni J (2007) Modeling of three-dimensional cutting forces in micro-end-milling. J Micromech Microeng 17(4):67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Automobile Engineering, School of Engineering and TechnologySurya Group of InstitutionsVikiravandiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSSN College of EngineeringKalavakkamIndia

Personalised recommendations