Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability analysis for highly non-linear and complex model using ANN-MCM simulation

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To predict reliability for highly non-linear and complex model efficiently and accurately, an artificial neural network (ANN) based Monte Carlo method (MCM) is proposed. In this method, ANN trained by backpropagation (BP) algorithm is developed to establish the relationship between inputs and outputs. The trained ANN model is then connected to MCM to predict reliability and reliability sensitivity of structure. To examine the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method, results obtained by polynomial-FOSM (first-order second moment) method and ANN-AFOSM (advanced first-order second moment) method are provided. Compared with the traditional Monte Carlo method, the time consumed by ANN-MCM, polynomial-FOSM and ANN-AFOSM methods only accounts for 0.14% of the traditional MCM. The reliability analysis and reliability sensitivity analysis results of ANN-MCM method are very close to traditional MCM, polynomial-FOSM method yields large errors, ANN-AFOSM is in between. It shows that the proposed method is of high accuracy and efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gobet E, Turkedjiev P (2016) Adaptive importance sampling in least-squares Monte Carlo algorithms for backward stochastic differential equations. Stoch Processes Appl 127(4):1171–1203

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Papaioannou I, Papadimitriou C, Straub D (2016) Sequential importance sampling for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 62:66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alvarez DA, Uribe F, Hurtado JE (2018) Estimation of the lower and upper bounds on the probability of failure using subset simulation and random set theory. Mech Syst Signal Process 100:782–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eijnden APVD, Hicks MA (2017) Efficient subset simulation for evaluating the modes of improbable slope failure. Comput Geotech 88:267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Quaranta G (2011) Finite element analysis with uncertain probabilities. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(1–4):114–129

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Sudret B, Kiureghian AD (2002) Comparison of finite element reliability methods. Probab Eng Mech 17(4):337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohanraj M, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C (2015) Applications of artificial neural networks for thermal analysis of heat exchangers—a review. Int J Therm Sci 90(4):150–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chojaczyk AA, Teixeira AP, Neves LC et al (2015) Review and application of artificial neural networks models in reliability analysis of steel structures. Struct Saf 52(3):78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lv Z, Song S, Li H et al (2009) Reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis for structure. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen JJ (2015) Fatigue damage estimation in non-linear systems using a combination of Monte Carlo simulation and the first order reliability method. Mar Struct 44:203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Z, Jian C, Han X, Dean Hu, Yu S (2014) A response surface approach for structural reliability analysis using evidence theory. Adv Eng Softw 69:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Díaz J, Pereira F, Romera L et al (2012) Probabilistic assessment of the structural failure of single-lap bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes 37(9):70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu Y, Liu S, Ding S, Liao Y (2015) Application of response surface method for contact fatigue reliability analysis of spur gear with consideration of EHL. J Central South Univ 22(7):2549–2556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu Y, Liu S, Chang J, Zhang J (2015) An intelligent method for contact fatigue reliability analysis of spur gear under EHL. J Central South Univ 22(9):3389–3396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nawi MN, Khan et al (2013) A new Levenberg Marquardt based back propagation algorithm trained with cuckoo search. In: The 4th international conference on electrical engineering and informatics (ICEEI 2013), pp 18–23

  16. Cheng J, Li QS, Xiao R (2008) A new artificial neural network-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis. Probab Eng Mech 23(1):51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duan W, Wang Z (2007) Probability strength design of steam turbine blade and sensitivity analysis with respect to random parameters based on response surface method. Proc CSEE 27(5):99–104 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li C, Han X (2011) Analysis of reliability sensitivity for gear engagement based on response surface methods. J Aerosp Power 26(3):711–715 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schön TB, Svensson A, Murray L et al (2018) Probabilistic learning of nonlinear dynamical systems using sequential Monte Carlo. Mech Syst Signal Process 104:866–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li S, Anisetti A (2017) A tribo-dynamic contact fatigue model for spur gear pairs. Int J Fatigue 98:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei J, Zhang A, Gao P (2016) A study of spur gear pitting under EHL conditions: theoretical analysis and experiments. Tribol Int 94:146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fajdiga G (2015) Computational fatigue analysis of contacting mechanical elements. Tehnicki Vjesnik 22(1):169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Martini A, Escoffier B, Wang Q et al (2006) Prediction of subsurface stress in elastic perfectly plastic rough components. Tribol Lett 23(3):243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dubi A (1999) Monte Carlo applications in systems engineering. Wiley, New York (in Chinese)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this paper was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 51705229).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Hu.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Marcelo A. Trindade.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Y., Xiao, Cd. & Shi, Yy. Reliability analysis for highly non-linear and complex model using ANN-MCM simulation. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 251 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1163-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1163-z

Keywords

Navigation