Internal turning of sintered carbide parts: tool wear and surface roughness evaluation

  • Nivaldo Lemos Coppini
  • Anselmo Eduardo Diniz
  • Felipe Soares Lacerda
  • Marcelo Bonandi
  • Elesandro Antonio Baptista
Technical Paper


Turning of sintered carbide parts has not been a common theme in the literature such as the case of other hardened materials. This is a statement made on the basis of recent research on this subject in which journals and conference proceedings were consulted. However, cutting of sintered cemented carbide parts, especially the turning operation, is an important task for a large number of applications where the typical properties of these materials are required. Therefore, the aim of this research was to carry out internal turning experiments in the manufacture of sintered cemented carbide dies used to forge beer cans. The focus of the experiments was to measure and analyze the workpiece surface roughness and wear of cutting edges used in internal turning process. Therefore, samples of sintered cemented carbide WC–Co (12% Co) were submitted to internal turning process with PCD insert tool. Cutting speed and feed rate were used as input variables in the experiments. It was found that, neither very low cutting speeds, nor high feeds can be used to avoid early breakage of the tool. Moreover, for the experiments where no early tool breakage occurred, the increase of feed caused the number of cutting passes prior to the cutting edge breakage to decrease and the workpiece surface roughness to increase. The experiments performed in this work confirm that sintered cemented carbide internal turning, besides being viable, is also feasible to be used to replace grinding operations, at least in terms of surface quality obtained.


Hard turning Sintered cemented carbide Surface roughness Tool wear 



The authors are indebted to University of Taubaté and State University of Campinas, Nove de Julho University, and also to Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) for supporting this work.


  1. 1.
    Belmonte M, Ferro P, Fernandes AJS, Costa FM, Sacramento J, Silva RF (2003) Wear resistant CVD diamonds tools for turning of sintered hard metals. Diam Relat Mater 12(3–7):233–1268Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coppini NL, Diniz AE, Bonandi M, de Souza EM, Baptista EA (2013) Hard turning of sintered cemented carbide parts: a shop floor experience. Proc CIRP 8:368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zębala W, Kowalczyk R, Matras A (2015) Analysis and optimization of sintered carbides turning with PCD tools. Proc Eng 100:283–290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aouici H, Yallese MA, Chaoui K, Mabrouki T, Rigal JF (2011) Analysis of surface roughness and cutting force components in hard turning with CBN tool: prediction model and cutting conditions optimization. Measurement 45:344–353. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Godoy VAA, de Diniz AE (2011) Turning of interrupted and continuous hardened steel surfaces using ceramic and CBN cutting tools. J Mater Process Technol 211:1014–1025. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaçal A, Yildirim F (2013) High speed hard turning of AISI S1 (60WCrV8) Cold work tool steel. Acta Polytech Hung 10(8):169–186Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartarya G, Choudhury SK (2012) State of the art in hard turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 53:1–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2015) Machining of hardened steel—experimental investigations, performance modeling and cooling techniques: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:95–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2013) Effect of work material hardness and cutting parameters on performance of coated carbide tool when turning hardened steel: An optimization approach. Measurement 46:1572–1584. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sahoo AK, Orra K, Routra BC (2013) Application of response surface methodology on investigating flank wear in machining hardened steel using PVD TiN coated mixed ceramic insert. Int J Ind Eng Comput 4:469–478. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuljanic E, Sortino M, Totis G (2010) Machinability of difficult machining materials. In: 14th International research—trends in the development of machinery and associated technologyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suresh R, Basavarajappa S, Gaitonde VN, Samuel GL (2012) Machinability investigations on hardened AISI 4340 steel using coated carbide insert. Int J Refract Metal Hard Mater 33:75–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Varaprasad B, Srinivasa RC, Vinayac PV (2014) Effect of machining parameters on tool wear in hard turning of AISI D3 steel. Proc Eng 97:338–345. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deshpande Y, Andhare A, Sahu NK (2017) Estimation of surface roughness using cutting parameters, force, sound, and vibration in turning of Inconel 718. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 39(5):1–10. Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferreira R, Rehor J, Lauro CH, Carou D, Davim JP (2016) Analysis of the hard turning of AISI H13 steel with ceramic tools based on tool geometry: surface roughness, tool wear and their relation. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 38(8):2413–2420. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    da Silva RB, Machado AR, Ezugwub EO, Bonneyc J, Sales WF (2013) Tool life and wear mechanisms in high speed machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy with PCD tools under various coolant pressures. J Mater Process Technol 213(8):1459–1464. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Degarmo EP, Black JT, Kohser RA (2003) Materials and processes in manufacturing, 9th edn. Wiley, New Jersey. ISBN 0-471-65653-4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nivaldo Lemos Coppini
    • 1
  • Anselmo Eduardo Diniz
    • 2
  • Felipe Soares Lacerda
    • 3
  • Marcelo Bonandi
    • 3
  • Elesandro Antonio Baptista
    • 3
  1. 1.Universidade de TaubatéTaubatéBrazil
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of CampinasCampinasBrazil
  3. 3.Nove de Julho UniversitySão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations