Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of process parameters on residual stresses in deep-drawing process with FEM and experimental evaluations

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents experimental and simulation study to minimize residual stress in cylindrical deep-drawing process. Eight significant process parameters including initial blank thickness, punch and die shoulder radii, blank–holder force, punch velocity, and coefficients of friction between die–blank, holder–blank, and punch–blank are considered. According to number of parameters, the Taguchi’s method is employed to perform design of experiments. The die is designed and manufactured, and the experiments are carried out using AISI 1006 carbon steel sheet. Hole-drilling method based on ASTM E 837-99 standard is applied to measure the residual stresses in drawn cups. Moreover, the deep-drawing process is simulated wholly using ABAQUS/explicit software and the accuracy of finite-element model is verified using experimental results. Finally, the analysis of variance method is applied to define the most important parameters and obtain an optimum level to minimize the residual stress in cylindrical deep-drawing process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BHF:

Blank–holder force (KN)

r d :

Die shoulder radius (mm)

r p :

Punch shoulder radius (mm)

µ d :

Coefficient of friction between die and blank

µ h :

Coefficient of friction between holder and blank

µ p :

Coefficient of friction between punch and blank

References

  1. Reddy BL, Ravindra Reddy PVR, Chenna Kesava Rao B (2013) A review on residual stresses in deep drawing. Int J Inno Res Sci Eng Technol 3(2):802–804

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuriyama S, Yoshida Y, Takahashi T, Kumagaya S, Aoki T, Miyauchi K (2003) Development of simulation code for calculating residual stress distribution in D-I cans produced by both-sided ironing process. J Mater Process Technol 140:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Incandela O, Tabourot L, Porret P, Balland P, Arrieux R, Ducher F (2004) Modelling and analysis of a deep-drawing operation: key factors for successful comparisons between experimental and simulated results. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:1105–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Padmanabhan R, Oliveira MC, Alves JL, Menezes LF (2008) Numerical simulation and analysis on the deep drawing of LPG bottles. J Mater Process Technol 200:416–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pourkamali Anaraki A, Shahabizadeh M, Babaee B (2012) Finite element simulation of multi-stage deep drawing processes & comparison with experimental results. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 6:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  6. Danckert J (1994) The residual stress distribution in the wall of a deep-drawn and ironed cup determined experimentally and by FEM. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 43(1):249–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ragab MS, Orban HZ (2000) Effect of ironing on the residual stresses in deep drawn cups. J Mater Process Technol 99:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh SK, Kumar V, Reddy PP, Gupta AK (2014) Finite element simulation of ironing process under warm conditions. J Mater Process Technol 3(1):71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Padmanabhan R, Oliveira MC, Laurent H, Alves JL, Menezes LF (2009) Study on springback in deep drawn tailor welded blanks. Int J Mater Form 1:829–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassan H, Maqbool F, Güner A, Hartmaier A, Ben Khalifa N, Tekkaya AE (2016) Springback prediction and reduction in deep drawing under influence of unloading modulus degradation. Int J Mater Form 9:619–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Danckert J (1995) Reduction of the residual stresses in a deep-drawn cup by modifying the draw die profile. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 44(1):259–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gnaeupel-Herold T, Foecke TJ, Prask H, Fields R (2005) An investigation of springback stresses in AISI-1010 deep drawn cups. Mater Sci Eng A 399:26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brabie GH, Nanu NE, Radu M (2009) The influence of the punch shape on the residual stresses distribution and spring back in the case of conical drawn parts. The Ann of “Dunărea De Jos” University Of Galaţi Fascicle V Technol In Mach Build; ISSN 1221-4566

  14. Sherbiny ME, Zein H, Abd-Rabou M, Shazly ME (2014) Thinning and residual stresses of sheet metal in the deep drawing process. Mater Des 55:869–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Colgan M, Monaghan J (2003) Deep drawing process: analysis and experiment. J Mater Process Technol 132:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Browne MT, Hillery MT (2003) Optimizing the variables when deep-drawing C.R.1 cups. J Mater Process Technol 136:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raju S, Ganesan G, Karthikeyan R (2010) Influence of variables in deep drawing of AA 6061 sheet. Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 20:1856–1862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Venkateswarlu G, Davidson MJ, Tagore GRN (2010) Influence of process parameters on the cup drawing of aluminum 7075 sheet. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2(11):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roy RK (2010) A primer on the Taguchi method. 2nd edn, SME

  20. Rossini N, Dassisti M, Benyounis K, Olabi A (2012) Methods of measuring residual stresses in components. Mater Des 35:572–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM E837-13a (2000) Test method for determining residual stresses by the hole-drilling strain-gage method

  22. ASTM E8M-16a (2004) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials [metric]

  23. Tigrinho LMV, Santos RA, Chemin Filho RA, Marcondes PV (2008) Experimental investigation on the influence of the lubricant type in the punch stretching of extra deep-drawing steel. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 30:290–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the research support of the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

    Masoud Kardan & Ali Askari

  2. School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Ali Parvizi

Authors
  1. Masoud Kardan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Parvizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali Askari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Parvizi.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Márcio Bacci da Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kardan, M., Parvizi, A. & Askari, A. Influence of process parameters on residual stresses in deep-drawing process with FEM and experimental evaluations. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 157 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1085-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1085-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation