Grey relational analysis-based genetic algorithm optimization of electrical discharge drilling of Nimonic-90 superalloy

  • Arun Kumar Pandey
  • Girish Dutt Gautam
Technical Paper


Nickel-based superalloys are being increasingly used in aerospace, automotive industries due to their excellent thermo-mechanical properties. These applications require complex shapes and profiles which may not be obtained by conventional machining processes. These materials are also known as difficult-to-machine due to their excellent thermo-mechanical properties. The electrical discharge drilling proves its suitability in the precision drilling of superalloys. During, the electrical discharge drilling of these materials, hole taper, hole circularity and hole dilation are key attributes which influence the drilled hole quality. In this research paper, the experiments have been conducted by L27 orthogonal array and this experimental data have been utilized for developing the models of different geometrical quality characteristics such as hole circularity, hole taper and hole dilation. Further, a new hybrid approach grey relational analysis-based genetic algorithm has been proposed and implemented for the multi-objective optimization of different quality characteristics. The effects of different process parameters on various geometrical quality characteristics have also been discussed. Finally, the confirmation tests have been performed to validate the predicted results obtained by the proposed hybrid methodology to the experimental results. It has been observed by the comparison results that the machining performance in the electrical discharge drilling process has been remarkably improved through proposed approach.


Electrical discharge drilling Nimonic-90 Multi-objective optimization Hole taper Hole circularity and dilation Grey relational analysis-based genetic algorithm (GRGA) 


  1. 1.
    Ezugwu EO (2005) Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(12–13):1353–1367. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choudhury IA, El-Baradie MA (1998) Machinability of nickel-base super alloys: a general review. J Mater Process Technol 77(1–3):278–284. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ezugwu EO, Wang ZM, Machado AR (1999) The machinability of nickel-based alloys: a review. J Mater Process Technol 86(1–3):1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun S, Brandt M, Dargusch MS (2010) Thermally enhanced machining of hard-to-machine materials—A review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(8):663–680. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ulutan D, Ozel T (2011) Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(3):250–280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Yamane Y (2003) An overview of the machinability of aeroengine alloys. J Mater Process Technol 134(2):233–253. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar V, Jangra KK, Kumar V, Sharma N (2016) WEDM of nickel based aerospace alloy: optimization of process parameters and modelling. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM). Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ho KH, Newman ST (2003) State of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(13):1287–1300. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuppan P, Rajadurai A, Narayanan S (2008) Influence of EDM process parameters in deep hole drilling of Inconel 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38(1):74–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar A, Maheshwari S, Sharma C, Beri N (2011) Analysis of Machining Characteristics in Additive Mixed Electric Discharge Machining of Nickel-Based Super Alloy Inconel 718. Mater Manuf Processes 26(8):1011–1018. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ay M, Çaydaş U, Hasçalık A (2013) Optimization of micro-EDM drilling of inconel 718 superalloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(5):1015–1023. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mandal A, Dixit AR, Das AK, Mandal N (2016) Modeling and optimization of machining nimonic C-263 superalloy using multicut strategy in WEDM. Mater Manuf Process 31(7):860–868. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Torres A, Luis CJ, Puertas I (2015) Analysis of the influence of EDM parameters on surface finish, material removal rate, and electrode wear of an INCONEL 600 alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1):123–140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh PN, Raghukandan K, Rathinasabapathi M, Pai BC (2004) Electric discharge machining of Al–10%SiCP as-cast metal matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:1653–1657. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guo Y, Zhang G, Wang L, Hu Y (2016) Optimization of parameters for EDM drilling of thermal-barrier-coated nickel superalloys using gray relational analysis method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9):1595–1605. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maity K, Mishra H (2016) ANN modelling and Elitist teaching learning approach for multi-objective optimization of $$\upmu $$ μ -EDM. J Intell Manuf. Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin CL, Lin JL, Ko TC (2002) Optimisation of the EDM process based on the orthogonal array with fuzzy logic and grey relational analysis method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19(4):271–277. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    KMR G, R G, HR D, SR M (2009) Development of hybrid model and optimization of surface roughness in electric discharge machining using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm. J Mater Process Technol 209(3):1512–1520. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pandey AK, Dubey AK (2013) Modeling and optimization of kerf taper and surface roughness in laser cutting of titanium alloy sheet. J Mech Sci Technol 27(7):2115–2124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang L, Jia Z, Wang F, Liu W (2010) A hybrid model using supporting vector machine and multi-objective genetic algorithm for processing parameters optimization in micro-EDM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(5):575–586. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tzeng C-J, Chen R-Y (2013) Optimization of electric discharge machining process using the response surface methodology and genetic algorithm approach. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14(5):709–717. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Muthuramalingam T, Mohan B (2014) Application of Taguchi-grey multi responses optimization on process parameters in electro erosion. Measurement 58:495–502. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pandey AK, Dubey AK (2013) Multiple quality optimization in laser cutting of difficult-to-laser-cut material using grey–fuzzy methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(1):421–431. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pandey AK, Dubey AK (2012) Simultaneous optimization of multiple quality characteristics in laser cutting of titanium alloy sheet. Opt Laser Technol 44:1858–1865. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentBundelkhand Institute of Engineering and TechnologyJhansiIndia
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentJaypee University of Engineering and TechnologyGunaIndia

Personalised recommendations