Approximate analytical methodology for calculating friction factors in flow through polygonal cross section ducts

  • M. C. Reis
  • L. A. Sphaier
  • L. S. de B. Alves
  • R. M. Cotta
Technical Paper
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

An approximate analytical methodology for calculating the friction factor within ducts of irregular cross-section is herein proposed. The approximations are developed by transforming the original governing PDEs into simpler ODEs, using approximation rules provided by the coupled integral equations approach. The transformed system is directly integrated and analytical solutions for the friction factor are readily obtained. Four different approximation cases are analyzed, which yield simple closed-form expressions for calculating the friction factor in terms of geometric parameters for rectangular, triangular, and trapezoidal ducts. The results of these expressions are compared with literature data, and very reasonable agreement is seen. After performing an error analysis of the results, regions for applicability of the methodology where accuracy requirements can be maintained are highlighted. Finally, enhanced approximation formulas yielding maximum errors as low as 3% are developed by using simple weighted averages of different approximation cases.

Keywords

Lumped-capacitance formulation Arbitrary geometry Friction factor Mathematical modeling 

List of symbols

a, b, c

Geometric parameters in cross-section domain

\(D_{\mathrm{H}}\)

Hydraulic diameter

f

Fanning’s friction-factor

\(G^*\)

Dimensionless pressure gradient

\(H_{\alpha ,\beta }\)

Hermite approximation

K

Aspect ratio

p

Pressure

u

Axial velocity

\(\bar{u}\)

Cross-sectional averaged velocity

U

Dimensionless axial velocity

x

Axial variable

X

Dimensionless function for left boundary

y, z

Cross-section variables

Y, Z

Dimensionless problem variables

\(z_1\)

Function for left boundary

Re

Reynolds number

Greek symbols

\(\alpha\), \(\beta\), \(\nu\)

Hermite approximation parameters

\(\xi\), \(\eta\)

Dimensionless left boundary function parameters

\(\mu\)

Dynamic viscosity

\(\zeta _i\)

Solution constants

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Brazilizan Government funding agencies CAPES, CNPq, and FAPERJ.

References

  1. 1.
    Hermite M Ch. (1878) Sur la formule d’interpolation de Lagrange. J Crelle 84:70–79Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mennig J, Auerbach T, Hälg W (1983) Two point Hermite approximation for the solution of linear initial value and boundary value problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 39(2):199–224MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mennig J, Özişik MN (1985) Coupled integral equation approach for solving melting or solidification. Int J Heat Mass Transf 28(8):1481–1485CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aparecido JB, Cotta RM (1990) Improved one-dimensional fin solutions. Heat Transf Eng 11(1):49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scofano-Neto F, Cotta RM (1992) Counterflow double-pipe heat exchanger analysis using a mixed lumped-differential formulation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 35:1723–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scofano-Neto F, Cotta RM (1993) Improved hybrid lumped-differential formulation for double-pipe heat-exchanger analysis. J Heat Transf: ASME 115(4):921–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corrêa EJ, Cotta RM (1998) Enhanced lumped-differential formulations of diffusion problems. Appl Math Model 22(3):137–152CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reis MCL, Macêdo EN, Quaresma JNN (2000) Improved lumped-differential formulations in hyperbolic heat conduction. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 27(7):965–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jian Su (2004) Improved lumped models for transient radiative cooling of a spherical body. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 31(1):85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruperti NJ, Cotta RM, Falkenberg CV, Su J (2004) Engineering analysis of ablative thermal protection for atmospheric reentry: improved lumped formulations and symbolic-numerical computation. Heat Transf Eng 25(6):101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dantas LB, Orlande HRB, Cotta RM (2007) Improved lumped-differential formulations and hybrid solution methods for drying in porous media. Int J Therm Sci 46(9):878–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ge Su, Tan Zheng, Jian Su (2009) Improved lumped for transient heat conduction in a slab with temperature-dependent thermal conductivity. Appl Math Model 33(1):274–283CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tan Z, Su G, Su J (2009) Improved lumped models for combined convective and radiative cooling of a wall. Appl Therm Eng 29(11–12):2439–2443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    An C, Su J (2011) Improved lumped models for transient combined convective and radiative cooling of multi-layer composite slabs. Appl Therm Eng 31(14–15):2508–2517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keshavarz P, Taheri M (2007) An improved lumped analysis for transient heat conduction by using the polynomial approximation method. Heat Mass Transf 43(11):1151–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sadat H (2005) A general lumped model for transient heat conduction in one-dimensional geometries. Appl Therm Eng 25(4):567–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sadat H (2006) A second order model for transient heat conduction in a slab with convective boundary conditions. Appl Therm Eng 26(8):962–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sphaier LA, Jurumenha DS (2012) Improved lumped-capacitance model for heat and mass transfer in adsorbed gas discharge operations. Energy 44(1):985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    An Chen, Jian Su (2013) Lumped parameter model for one-dimensional melting in a slab with volumetric heat generation. Appl Therm Eng 60(1–2):387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Underwood CP (2014) An improved lumped parameter method for building thermal modelling. Energy Build 79:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    An Chen, Jian Su (2015) Lumped models for transient thermal analysis of multilayered composite pipeline with active heating. Appl Therm Eng 87:749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mikhailov MD, Özişik MN (1984) Unified analysis and solutions of heat and mass diffusion. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shah RK, London AL (1978) Laminar flow forced convection in ducts: a source book for compact heat exchanger analytical data. In: Irvine TF Jr, Hartnet JP (eds) Advances in heat transfer. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aparecido JB (1988) Transformada Integral Generalizada no Escoamento Laminar e Transferência de Calor em Dutos Retilíneos de Geometria ArbitráriaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering – TEM/PGMECUniversidade Federal Fluminense – UFFNiteróiBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratório de Transmissáo e Tecnologia do Calor – LTTC, Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica – POLI/COPPEUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations