Advertisement

Constructive-regime parameters of rotor-brush cleaner for tuberous roots dry cleaning

  • Beket Nuralin
  • Askar Bakushev
  • Yernazar Janaliev
  • Maxut Dussenov
  • Zhanna Kubasheva
  • Nellya Omarova
  • Viktor Zakharov
Technical Paper
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

Applying engineering design concepts and analysis, this work outlines the development of a small scale root cleaner from computer model simulation to a working prototype. The methodologies of mechanical design, material acquisition, construction and prototype testing are addressed. Results of researches of innovative technologies of tuberous roots cleaning process showed that efficiency increase of cleaning quality in the form of connected soil with vegetable remains depends on rational constructive-technological system and optimum constructive-regime parameters of device. Constructive-technological system of rotor-brush cleaner with justification of constructive-regime parameters is offered: brush angle, frequency of brush rotation, frequency of disk rotation. Quality of cleaning in this cleaner increases due to the application f rotor brush as working body which clears product in cleaning channel formed by disk, propeller and brush. Power consumption decreases as a result of application of propeller rational form and compact arrangement of working bodies.

Keywords

Cleaning Mathematical model Power consumption Root crops Sample preparation Vegetables 

References

  1. 1.
    Senff SP, Bendlin L, Garibaldi L, Souza A, Duclós LC, da Veiga CP (2016) Competitive strategies applied to agribusiness in South-Eastern Paraná, Brazil. Afr J Agric Res 11(15):1309–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patent US479562. A Machine for cleaning and peeling vegetables (1891)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patent US856037. Vegetable washing and peeling machine (1906)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wulfkuehler S, Dietz J, Schmidt H, Weiss A, Carle R (2015) Quality of fresh-cut radicchio cv. Rosso di Chioggia (Cichorium intybus L. var. foliosum Hegi) as affected by water jet cutting and different washing procedures. Eur Food Res Technol 240(1):159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De-Xing Z, Weifang C (2015) Research on a novel water-saving cleaning technology for wheat. In: 4th International conference on mechatronics, materials, chemistry and computer engineeringGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moos JA, Steel DD, Kirkpatrick DC (2002) Small-scale mechanical carrot washer for research sample preparation. Appl Eng Agric 18(2):235–241Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosenberg HR, Garrett RE, Voss RE, Mitchell DL (1990) Labor and competitive agricultural technology in 2010. J Agric Econ 42(3):26Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Medvedev VT (2002) Engineering ecology. Gardariki, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Singh BK, Kulshresh SB, Kapoor KN (1995) An orange juice-borne diarrhoeal out break due to enter toxigenic E. coli. J Food Sci Technol 32:504Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veerraju P, Rangarao GCP (1990) Food packaging in India. Perspect Indian Food Ind 9:14Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rahman KMK, Malik A (2002) Microbiological quality of milk, vegetables and fruits juices. J Food Sci Technol 39(2):120Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wheatley C, Scott GJ (1992) Identification of product Opportunities. In: Production development for root and tuber crops. Proceedings of regional workshop, LimaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mustafin, R. Kh. (2011) Prevention of cattle traumatism. Materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference within XXI International specialized exhibition Agrocomplex 2011. Bashkir GAU, UfaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wustman R, Booth RH, Rhoades RE (1985) Possibilities for the application of small scale potato storage techniques in developing countries. Research Institute for Vegetables, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ardanov C-SY, Shukhanov SN, Boloyev PA (2014) Modernization of tuberous roots dry cleaning method. Moscow: Tract Agric Mach 6:13–14Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Romanyuk NN, Sashko KV, Pashkovskiy SD, Nukeshev SO, Kushnir VG (2016) On the determination of design parameters of a machine for cleaning tuberous roots from impurities. Moscow: Tract Agric Mach 5:13–16Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sabiyev UK, Lisyanov VV, Sabiyev IU (2013) Waterless tuberous roots cleaner. Moscow: Tract Agric Mach 5:14 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mukhin VA, Dusenov MK (2011) A device for the increasing of efficiency of tuberous roots brush cleaner. Moscow: Tract Agric Mach 5:18–20 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dussenov MK (2011) Efficiency increase of tuberous roots dry cleaning by justification of rotor and brush device parameters. Thesis of Canadian Technology Science. Saratov State Agricultural University, Saratov, RussiaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dussenov MK, Mukhin VA, Shkuratov AV (2011) Device for tuberous roots cleaning. Patent RU 104 815U1Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dabo-Niang S, Guillas S (2010) Functional semiparametric partially linear model with autoreqressive errors. J Multivar Anal 101(2):307–315CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Adler YP (1981) Planning of experiment by search of optimum conditions. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gursky D (2006) Calculations in MATHCAD 12. SPB, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beket Nuralin
    • 1
  • Askar Bakushev
    • 1
  • Yernazar Janaliev
    • 1
  • Maxut Dussenov
    • 1
  • Zhanna Kubasheva
    • 1
  • Nellya Omarova
    • 1
  • Viktor Zakharov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Professional and Technical TrainingWest Kazakhstan Agrarian-Technical University Named After Zhangir KhanOralKazakhstan

Personalised recommendations