Numerical analysis and performance experiment of electric submersible pump with different diffuser vanes number

Technical Paper
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Space diffuser is one of the most critical flow components in electric submersible pumps; its hydraulic design has the significant effects on the pump performance. In this paper, a typical electric submersible pump was chosen as the research object to study the influence of space diffuser vanes number, by means of numerical simulation and experimental test methods. Based on the same curve profile and same impeller, the diffuser vanes number was adjusted to three different schemes of 6, 7, and 8. Calculation domain was created based on single-stage pump model, and meshed by the high density of structured grids associating with grid independence analysis. The numerical simulations under multi-conditions were performed based on SST k-ω turbulence model and standard wall function. Through the comparisons of predicted pump performance, we found that the pump head is increasing slightly with the increase of vanes number under part-loading conditions. However, excessive vanes occupy more passage area, which leads to blockings and more hydraulic losses under over-loading conditions. The diffuser scheme with seven vanes matches the impeller very well with less hydraulic losses. The test results prove that this scheme has an excellent pump performance, both the single-stage head and efficiency are higher than the Chinese national standard.

Keywords

Numerical simulation Space diffuser Electric submersible pump Vanes number Efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51609106), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20150508), Jiangsu Province Universities Natural Sciences Foundation (Grant No. 15KJB570001), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2015M581737 and 2017T100331), Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (Grant No. 1501069A), Senior Personnel Foundation of Jiangsu University (Grant No. 15JDG047), and the Open Research Subject of Key Laboratory of Fluid and Power Machinery (Xihua University), Ministry of Education (Grant No. szjj2015-023).

References

  1. 1.
    Pineda H, Biazussi J, López F, Oliveira B, Carvalho RDM, Bannwart AC, Ratkovich N (2016) Phase distribution analysis in an Electrical Submersible Pump (ESP) inlet handling water–air two-phase flow using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). J Petrol Sci Eng 139:49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrios L, Prado G (2011) Experimental visualization of two-phase flow inside an electrical submersible pump stage. J Energy Res Technol 33:042901–042912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stel H, Sirino T, Ponce F, Chiva S, Morales REM (2015) Numerical investigation of the flow in a multistage electric submersible pump. J Petrol Sci Eng 136:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou L, Shi WD, Lu WG, Hu B, Wu S (2012) Numerical investigations and performance experiments of a deep-well centrifugal pump with different diffusers. J Fluids Eng Trans 134:0711002Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krain H (1981) A study on centrifugal impeller and diffuser flow. J Eng Power 103:688–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casartelli E, Saxer A, Gyarmathy G (1999) Numerical flow analysis in a subsonic vaned radial diffuser with leading edge redesign. ASME 121:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clements W, Artt D (1987) The influence of diffuser channel geometry on the flow range and efficiency of a centrifugal compressor. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 201:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Everitt J, Spakovszky Z (2011) An investigation of stall inception in centrifugal compressor vaned diffusers. ASME Conf Proc 54679:1737–1749Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cukurel B, Lawless P, Fleeter S (2010) Particle image velocity investigation of a high speed centrifugal compressor diffuser: spanwise and loading variations. J Turbomach 132:021010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou L, Shi WD, Cao WD, Yang HB (2015) CFD investigation and PIV validation of flow field in a compact return diffuser under strong part-load conditions. Sci China Tech Sci 58:405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonaiuti D, Zangeneh M, Aartojarvi R, Eriksson J (2010) Parametric design of a waterjet pump by means of inverse design, CFD calculations and experimental analyses. J Fluids Eng 132:031104–031115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goto A, Zangeneh M (2002) Hydrodynamic design of pump diffuser using inverse design method and CFD. J Fluids Eng 124:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goel T, Dorney D, Haftka R, Wei S (2008) Improving the hydrodynamic performance of diffuser vanes via shape optimization. Comput Fluids 37:705–723CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cresswell N, Ingram G, Dominy R (2015) The impact of diffuser augmentation on a tidal stream turbine. Ocean Eng 108:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lu ZX, Liu Q, Wang K, Chen K (2017) Worldwide technical analysis on multistage centrifugal pump based on patent map. J Drain Irrig Mach Engine 35:216–221Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    PTC Inc. (2010) Pro/ENGINEER Wildfire 5.0. PTC Inc., NeedhamGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang KH (2015) Project P5–design with Pro/ENGINEER, design theory & methods using Cad/Cae. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 449–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dubief Y, Delcayre F (2000) On coherent-vortex identification in turbulence. J Turbul 1:1–22MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ISO (1999) 9906 Rotodynamic pumps-hydraulic performance acceptance tests-grades 1 and 2. International Standardization Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou L, Shi WD, Li W, Agarwal R (2013) Numerical and experimental study of axial force and hydraulic performance in a deep-well centrifugal pump with different impeller rear shroud radius. J. Fluids Eng 135(10):104501–104508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Richardson L, Gaunt J (1927) The deferred approach to the limit. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 226:299–361CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research Center of PumpsJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangChina
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringNantong UniversityNantongChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Fluid and Power Machinery, Ministry of EducationXihua UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations