Value proposition analysis applied to military training airplane design concept

  • Fernando Vogel Schmitz
  • Bento S. de Mattos
  • Anderson Ribeiro Correia
Technical Paper

Abstract

Among the current first-line Western fighter aircraft are the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor, Dassault Rafale, F-35 Lightning II, and Eurofighter Typhoon. On July 31st, 2015, the first F-35 squadron was declared ready for deployment after intensive testing by the United States military. However, since the First Gulf War the geopolitical scenario shows the predominance of a new type of conflict and the recent combat operations require different aircraft characteristics when compared with cold war-era types. The present work analyzes the market for military training/light attack aircraft over several decades, taking into account this environment. The authors of the present work believe that only innovative new designs can justify the substitution of current aircraft types in service. Thus, traditional market analysis considering replacement of existing fleets may not suffice to estimate the market potential of each new proposal. The market profile obtained is the result of profound analysis of the global fleet of trainer aircraft and their missions combined with geopolitical and economic forecasts. At first, the analysis carried out here considered a macro view of the market. A segmentation was proposed, after the identification of the major categories. The second part of the study uses the value proposition concept and analyzes the market perspectives for each of four suggested value propositions, through a bottom-up analysis. The value propositions summarize how a product differs from the others, and what a product can offer to a prospective customer. Thus, successful companies will be those who can identify the most interesting slices of the market and address the right product to them. The proposed method helps to offer more value to the customer for the same price, increasing competitiveness. Considering the phases and duration of aircraft design, the identification of the best value proposition during the product conceptual design is crucial to find out the best suitable configuration to the market. In this process, engineers and designers need to be provided with full freedom not only to suggest the value propositions, but also to maximize the chosen proposition throughout the project. The article concludes that the engineering shall be fully integrated into the market analysis as a way to both optimize the market potential of the new product.

Keywords

Military trainer aircraft Counter-insurgency aircraft Value proposition Aircraft design requirements Military aircraft market 

References

  1. 1.
    Duermyer R (2011) Value Proposition. Available: http://homebusiness.about.com/od/glossary/g/def_valueProp.htm. Accessed 3 Feb 2010
  2. 2.
    Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy. Free Press, New York, p 397Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Investopedia (2015) Value Proposition definition. Available http://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/valueproposition.asp. Accessed 15 Aug 2015
  4. 4.
    Butler A (2010) T-X Plan not likely until next year. Aviation WeekGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trimble S (2010) US Air Force, industry prepare for T-38 replacement, Flight International. Accessed 20 Sept 2010Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Graham W, David M (ed.) (1981) Embraer starts EMB-312 marketing. Flight International I.P.C. Transport Press, Sutton, 120(3788):219Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmitz FV Aplicação da Análise por Propostas de Valor no Estudo do Mercado Futuro de Aeronaves de Treinamento Militar, Master Thesis, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, São José dos Campos, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drug-Busting Operations Air-to-Air Victories. Central and Latin America Database. September 1st, 2003, Accessed 8 Nov 2012Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bass F (1969) A new product growth model for consumer durables. Working Paper—Purdue University, p 14, Accessed 10 Feb, 2010Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paul J et al. (2006) Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft 2006-2007, Jane’s Information Group. p 968Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jane’s Defence Forecast. Available for registered users at: http://www.bibl.ita.br/, Accessed 17 Aug 2011
  12. 12.
    Forecast International (2009) The Market for Military Fixed-Wing Trainer Aircraft 2010-2019. SampleGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    KAI—KOREA AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES LTD. Available: http://www.koreaaero.com/english/business/kt1_01.asp, Accessed 20 Jan 2010
  15. 15.
    Wikipedia, “List of Ongoing Conflicts,” Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_armed_conflicts, Accessed 17 Aug 2015
  16. 16.
    Marshall MG, Cole BR (2014) Global Report 2014. Center for Systemic Peace, Vienna, p 60Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Uppsala Conflict Data Program. Available: http://www.pcr.uu.se/gpdatabase/search.php, Accessed 8 Jan, 2010
  18. 18.
    Weisgerber M (2014) Pentagon Debates Policy to Strengthen, Disperse Bases, Defense News, April 13, 2014; referenced April 19, 2014. As of January 29, 2015: http://www.defensenews.com/article/20140413/DEFREG02/304130017/Pentagon-Debates-Policy-Strengthen-Disperse-Bases
  19. 19.
    SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. Disponível em <http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/milex_database>. Acesso em 28 de agosto de 2009

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Vogel Schmitz
    • 1
  • Bento S. de Mattos
    • 1
  • Anderson Ribeiro Correia
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Tecnológico de AeronáuticaSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations