Advertisement

Evaluation of welding characteristics using three-dimensional finite element simulation and experimentation for FSW of aluminum 6061

Technical Paper

Abstract

Aim of this study is to introduce numerical 3D finite element method (FEM) simulation to study characteristics of friction stir welding. A coupled experimental and numerical simulation study was carried out to study the effect of process parameters on welding characteristics for friction stir welding of aluminium 6061. As per Box–Behnken design, 15 experiments have been conducted on aluminium 6061 plates at three levels of spindle speed, tilt angle and tool pin diameter. Experimental results of tool vibration, force in X, Y and Z directions and ultimate tensile strength were collected and analyzed. Shearing of metal and metal flow patterns during the welding were analyzed and the responses were predicted using FEM simulation. Size of the shear zone around the tool pin was studied for different combinations of the parameters. The experimental results and the FEM-simulated values were found to be in good agreement. Interaction effect of the process parameters on the responses was analyzed using response surface methodology.

Keywords

Friction stir welding FEM simulation Tool vibration Welding forces Shearing of metal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work (Major project) was funded by Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India. Grant no.: SERB/F/1761/2015-16.

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas MW, Nicholas ED, Needham JC (1993) Improvements relating to friction welding international patent application no. PCT/GB92/02203, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flores OV, Kennedy C, Murr LE (1998) Micro structural issues in a friction stir welded aluminium alloy. Scr Mater 38(5):703–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghaffarpour M, Aziz A, Hejazi T-H (2015) Optimization of friction stir welding parameters using multiple response surface methodology. Proc I Mech E Part L J Mater Design Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420715602139 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arora KS, Pandey S, Schaper M, Kumar R (2010) Effect of process parameters on friction stir welding of aluminum alloy 2219-T87. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:941–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gadakh Vijay S, Kumar Adepu (2014) Friction stir welding window for AA6061-T6 aluminium alloy. Proc I Mech E Part B J Eng Manuf 228(9):1172–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchibabu V, Reddy GM, Kulkarni D, De A (2016) Friction stir welding of a thick Al–Zn–Mg alloy plate. J Mater Eng Perform 25:1163–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sorensen CD, Stahl AL (2007) Experimental measurements of load distributions on friction stir weld pin tools. Metall Mater Trans B 38:451–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kasman Sxefika, Kahraman Fatih (2014) Investigations for the effect of parameters on the weld performance of AA 5083-H111 joined by friction stir welding. Proc I Mech E Part B J Eng Manuf 228(8):937–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Balaji Srinivasan, Mahapatra Manas M (2012) Experimental study and modeling of friction stir welding process to produce optimized AA2219 butt welds for aerospace application. Proc I Mech E Part B J Eng Manuf 227(1):132–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neto DM, Neto P (2013) Numerical modeling of friction stir welding process: a literature review. Int J Adv. Manuf Technol 65:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Das Bipul, Pal Sukhomay, Bag Swarup (2017) Design and development of force and torque measurement setup for real time monitoring of friction stir welding process. Measurement 103:186–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhong YB, Wu CS, Padhy GK (2017) Effect of ultrasonic vibration on welding load, temperature and material flow in friction stir weldin. J Mater Process Technol 239:273–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pashazadeh Hamed, Masoumi Abolfazl, Teimournezhad Jamal (2013) A study on material flow pattern in friction stir welding using finite element method. Proc I Mech E Part B J Eng Manuf 227(10):1453–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shojaeefard Mohammad Hasan, Khalkhali Abolfazl, Akbari Mostafa, Asadi Parviz (2015) Investigation of friction stir welding tool parameters using FEM and neural network. Proc I Mech E Part L J Mater Design Appl 229(3):209–217Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trimble D, Monaghan J, O’donnell GE (2012) Force generation during friction stir welding of AA2024-T3. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61:9–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumar Sanjay, Kumar Sudhir (2015) Multi-response optimization of process parameters for friction stir welding of joining dissimilar Al alloys by gray relation analysis and Taguchi method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 37:665–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Papahn Hossein, Haghpanahi Mohammad, Bahemmat Pouya (2017) Using a novel fixture to study of temperature and applied forces during friction stir welding. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 39:531–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sato YS, Urata M, Kokawa H (2002) Parameters controlling microstructure and hardness during friction stir welding of precipitation-hardenable aluminum alloy 6063. Metall Mater Trans A 33A–3:625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Su H, Wu CS, Pittner A, Rethmeier M (2013) Simultaneous measurement of tool torque, traverse force and axial force in friction stir welding. J Manuf Process 15:495–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shi L, Wu CS (2017) Transient model of heat transfer and material flow at different stages of friction stir welding process. J Manuf Process 28:323–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dialami N, Chiumenti M, Cervera M, Segatori A, Osikowicz W (2017) Enhanced friction model for friction stir welding (FSW) analysis: simulation and experimental validation. Int J Mech Sci 133:555–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mostafapour Amir, Ebrahimpour Ali, Saeid Tohid (2017) Numerical and experimental study on the effects of welding environment and input heat on properties of FSSWed TRIP steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:1131–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pei Xianjun, Dong Pingsha (2017) A selectively-coupled shear localization model for friction stir welding process window estimation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 123:89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dialami N, Cervera M, Chiumenti M, Agelet de Saracibar C (2017) Local–global strategy for the prediction of residual stresses in FSW processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88:3099–3111CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Raghulapadu JK, Peddieson J, Buchanan GR (2008) A rotating plug model of friction stir welding heat transfer. Heat Transf Eng 29(3):321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mahoney MW, Rhodes CG, Flintoff JG (1998) Properties of friction-stir-welded 7075 T651 aluminum. Metall Mater Trans A 29:1955–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringVignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology and ResearchGunturIndia

Personalised recommendations