Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Heat recovery of dedusting systems in electric arc furnaces: concept of a bottoming cogeneration plant and techno-economic analysis

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Steelworks require large amount of energy in reduction, fusion and refining processes. A mini-mill is a steelwork that produces steel by melting scrap metal, pig iron and metallic elements in electric arc furnaces. Depending on the desired product, the refining process requires vacuum degassing to remove contaminant gases from the liquid steel. The vacuum in the degassing process can be obtained through steam ejectors, which use superheated steam. Furthermore, environmental legislation requires mini-mills to have dedusting systems over the electric furnaces. In general, a dedusting system generates high flow rates of hot off-gases, which indicates an interesting potential for heat recovering. In this paper, a cogeneration plant to recover heat from the dedusting system of a Brazilian mini-mill is proposed. The actual operation data are considered to calculate the heat available and to conceptualize a bottoming cogeneration plant that generates electric power and superheated steam for the ejectors of the degassing process. Results show that the proposed plant can generate 45.4% of the steam required by the ejectors and up to 2.4% of the power required by the electric arc furnace. Also, the heat recovering from the dedusting system reduces the use of cooling water by 29.3%. From an economic viewpoint, the cogeneration plant decreased the expenses for power, steam and cooling water by 1.5, 32 and 29%, respectively. Overall, there was an expense reduction of 4.8%, resulting in a payback period of 4.1 years in the case base. For a projected best case scenario, the payback period is about 2.3 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(adapted from [2])

Fig. 2

(adapted from [10])

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. \({\upeta }_{\text{cl}} = { }\left( {{{\dot{W}}}_\text{e} - {{\dot{W}}}_\text{p} } \right)/{q}_{\rm g} .\)

Abbreviations

\({b}_{\rm p}\) :

Bypass ratio [–]

C :

Specific cost [USD/MWh]

c p :

Specific heat [kJ/kgK]

D t :

Tube diameter [m]

\({E}\) :

Expense [USD/year]

\({f}\) :

Annuity factor [–]

\({H}\) :

Annual operating time [h]

\({h}\) :

Specific enthalpy [kJ/kg]

\({I}\) :

Investment cost [USD]

\({j}\) :

Annual interest rate [–]

\({k}\) :

Plant useful life [years]

\({L}\) :

Length [m]

\({m}\) :

Mass [kg]

\({{\dot{m}}}\) :

Mass flow [kg/s]

\({N}_{\rm t}\) :

Number of tubes [–]

\({P}\) :

Pressure [kPa]

\({\text{pb}}\) :

Payback [year]

\({q}\) :

Heat transfer rate [kW]

\({R}\) :

Revenue [USD/year]

\({r}_{\rm ev}\) :

Evaporation rate [–]

\({s}\) :

Specific entropy [kJ/kgK]

T :

Temperature [°C]

t :

Time [s]

\(\dot{W}\) :

Work transfer rate, power [kW]

Δ:

Difference

η :

Efficiency [–]

ρ :

Specific mass [kg/m]

ap:

Approach point

b:

Gas-fired boiler

c:

Colder than average condenser

cl:

Cycle

cur:

Current situation

cw:

Cooling water

d:

Degassing process

e:

Electric energy

ec:

Economizer section

ev:

Evaporator section

g:

Off-gas power generator

h:

Hotter than average

he:

Heat exchanger

i:

Inlet

i,j,k:

Indexes, counting variables

l:

Loss

ng:

Natural gas

o:

Outlet

om:

Operation and maintenance

p:

Pump

pp:

Pinch point

sat:

Saturation

sg:

(heat recovery) Steam generator

sh:

Superheater section

sl:

Salt

st:

Steam

t:

Turbine

tr:

Thermal reservoir

cg:

Cogeneration

off:

Ejector off

on:

Ejector on [–]

ABNT:

Brazilian Association of Tech. Standards

EAF:

Electric arc furnace

HRSG:

Heat recovering steam generator

LHV:

Lower heating value

NBR:

Brazilian standard

O&M:

Operation and maintenance

TR:

Thermal reservoir

References

  1. US Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Energy trends in selected manufacturing sectors: opportunities and challenges for environmentally preferable energy outcomes. http://www.techstuff.com/epa_energy.htm. Accessed Feb 2016

  2. Steinparzer T, Haider M, Zauner F, Enickl G, Michele-Naussed M, Horn AC (2013) Electric arc furnace off-gas heat recovery and experience with a testing plant. J Iron Steel Res Int 85(4):519–526. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.201300228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McBrien M, Serrenho AC, Allwood JM (2016) Potential for energy savings by heat recovery in an integrated steel supply chain. Appl Therm Eng 103:592–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jouhara H, Almahmoud S, Chauhan A, Delpech B, Nannou T, Tassou SA, Llera R, Lago F, Arribas JJ (2017) Experimental investigation on a flat heat pipe heat exchanger for waste heat recovery in steel industry. Energy Procedia 123:329–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson S, Si M (2014) Strategic analysis of energy efficiency projects: case study of a steel mill in Manitoba. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:814–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tarrés J, Maas S, Scholzen F, Zürbes A (2014) Simulated and experimental results on heat recovery from hot steel beams in a cooling bed applying modified solar absorbers. J Cleaner Product 68:261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen L, Yang B, Shen X, Xie Z, Sun F (2015) Thermodynamic optimization opportunities for the recovery and utilization of residual energy and heat in China’s iron and steel industry: a case study. Appl Therm Eng 86:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pili R, Romagnoli A, Spliethoff H, Wieland C (2017) Techno-economic analysis of waste heat recovery with ORC from fluctuating industrial sources. Energy Procedia 129:503–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramirez M, Epelde M, de Arteche MG, Panizza A, Hammerschmid A, Baresi M, Monti N (2017) Performance evaluation of an ORC unit integrated to a waste heat recovery system in a steel mill. Energy Procedia 129:535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nardin G, Meneghetti A, Dal Magro F, Benedetti N (2014) PCM-based energy recovery from electric arc furnaces. Appl Energy 136:947–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brandt C, Schuller N, Gaderer M, Kuckelkorn JM (2014) Development of a thermal oil operated waste heat exchanger within the off-gas an electric arc furnace at steel mills. Appl Therm Eng 66:335–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gaggioli W, Fabrizi F, Fontana F, Rinaldi L, Tarquini P (2014) An innovative concept of a thermal energy storage system based on a single tank configuration using stratifying molten salts as both heat storage medium and heat transfer fluid, and with an integrated steam generator. Energy Procedia 49:780–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lora EES, Nascimento MAR (2004) Thermoelectric generation: planning, design and operation (in Portuguese), vol 1. Interciência, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  14. Borgnakke C, Sonntag RE (2008) Fundamentals of thermodynamics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Santos CFP (2016) Thermoeconomic analysis and ecological efficiency of a thermoelectric power plant with chemical absorption of CO2 (in Portuguese). Dissertation (Master in Mechanical Engineering). São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Engineering, Guaratinguetá

  16. Vilela IAC (2007) Development of a thermoeconomic model which takes into account the environmental impacts (in Portuguese). Thesis (Doctor in Mechanical Engineering). São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Engineering, Guaratinguetá

  17. Jacobs JA, Schneider M (2009) Cogeneration application considerations. GE Energy, GER3430G (05/09). https://www.gepower.com/content/dam/gepower-pgdp/global/en_US/documents/technical/ger/ger-3430g-cogeneration-application-considerations.pdf. Accessed 24 Aug 2017

  18. OEDC Steel Committee (2015) Energy efficiency in the steel sector: why it works well, but not always. https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/Energy-efficiency-steel-sector-1.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2017

  19. Economist Intelligence Unit (2012) Energy efficiency and energy savings: a view from the building sector. The economist. http://www.bpie.eu/uploads/lib/document/attachment/16/EIU_CaseStudy_Report_2012.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Alexandre Matelli.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Jose A. dos Reis Parise.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

e Silva, C.A.A., Matelli, J.A. Heat recovery of dedusting systems in electric arc furnaces: concept of a bottoming cogeneration plant and techno-economic analysis. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0919-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0919-1

Keywords

Navigation