Advertisement

Improvement of effectiveness of EMHD flow separation control

  • Hari Sankar
  • A. M. PradeepEmail author
Technical Paper

Abstract

The present numerical study shows that the effectiveness of flow separation control using Electro-Magneto-Hydro-Dynamic (EMHD) method can be improved by choosing the dimensions of the actuator based on the Reynolds number and the shape of the model studied. The width of the electrode/magnet for most effective flow separation control should be approximately 2.5 times the boundary layer thickness, which in turn is dependent on the Reynolds number. The length of the EMHD actuator for most effective flow separation control can be the shortest based on manufacturing constraints as well as on the possibility of shifting of separation point. The application of Lorentz force inside the boundary layer near the separation point provides the most effective flow separation control. The studies are done for flow over a cylinder in low Reynolds number regime (Reynolds number = 200) and for flow over an elliptical airfoil in high Reynolds number regime (Reynolds number = 1.6 × 105).

Keywords

EMHD actuator Flow separation control Numerical Effectiveness Improvement Boundary layer 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Indian Institute of Bombay, Powai, India for providing the opportunity to do the associated work.

References

  1. 1.
    Resler EL, Sears WR (1958) The prospects for magneto-aerodynamics. J Aero Sci 25(4):235–245MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gailitis A, Lielausis O (1961) On a possibility to reduce the hydrodynamic resistance of a plate in an electrolyte. Appl Magn Hydrodyn 12:143–146Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dukure R, Lielausis O (1962) Experimental investigation of the effect of electromagnetical forces upon flow around bodies in electrolyte. Probl Magneto hydrodyn Plasmadyn (Riga) 647–650Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weier T, Fey U, Gerbeth G, Mutschke G, Avilov V (2000) Boundary layer control by means of electromagnetic forces. ERCOFTAC Bull 44:36–40Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim SJ, Lee CM (2000) Investigation of the flow around a circular cylinder under the influence of an electromagnetic force. Exp Fluids 28:252–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weier T, Gerbeth G (2004) Control of separated flows by time periodic Lorentz forces. Eur J Mech B-Fluid 23:835–849CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Posdziech G, Grundmann R (2001) Electromagnetic control of seawater flow around circular cylinders. Eur J Mech B-Fluid 20:255–274CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weier T, Shatrov V, Gerbeth G (2007) Flow control and propulsion in poor conductors. In: Molokov S, Moreau R, Moffatt HK (eds) Magnetohydrodynamics: historical evolution and trends. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 295–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Albrecht T, Stiller J, Metzkes H, Weier T, Gerbeth G (2010) Electromagnetic flow control in poor conductors. Eur Phys J Spec Top 220:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bakhtiari M, Ghassemi H (2015) Controlling of the boundary layer flow on a ship hull using MHD. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 37:479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsinober A (1989) MHD flow drag reduction (Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers). In: Bushnell DM, Hefner JN (eds) Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, pp 327–349Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grienberg E (1961) On determination of properties of some potential fields. Appl Magnetohydrodyn 12:147–154Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davidson PA (2001) An introduction to magnetohydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barkley D, Henderson RD (1996) Three-dimensional floquet stability analysis of the wake of a circular cylinder. J Fluid Mech 322:215–241CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sohankar A, Norberg C, Davidson L (1998) Low-Reynolds-number flow around a square cylinder at incidence: study of blockage, onset of vortex shedding and outlet boundary condition. Int J Numer Methods Fluids l26:39–56Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim WW, Menon S (1997) Application of the localized dynamic subgrid-scale model to turbulent wall bounded flows. In: Technical Report AIAA-97-0210, 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno: NV American Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vengadesan S, Nakayama A (2005) Evaluation of LES models for flow over bluff body from engineering application perspective. Sadhana 30(1):11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schlichting G (1979) Boundary layer theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu MH, Wen CY, Yen RH, Weng MC, Wang AB (2004) Experimental and numerical study of the separation angle for flow around a circular cylinder at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech 515:233–260CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen C (2009) Separation and circulation control on a thick blunt elliptical airfoil. PhD Thesis, The University of ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spalart PR, Jou WH, Strelets M, Allmara SR (1997) Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings and on a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach (Advances in DNS/LES). In: Liu C, Liu Z (ed) 1st AFOSR Int. Conf. on DNS/LES. Greyden Press, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    You D, Moin P (2008) Large-eddy simulation of flow separation over an airfoil using synthetic jets. J Fluid Struct 24:1349–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Choi H, Moin B (2012) Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimates revisited. Phys Fluids 24(1):011702–011702-5Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mutschke G, Gerbeth G, Albrecht T, Grundmann R (2006) Separation control at hydrofoils using Lorentz forces. Eur J Mech B-Fluid 25:137–152MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hinze JO (1975) Turbulence. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Viswanath PR (2007) Some thoughts on separation control strategies. Sadhana 32:83–92CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations