Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the hard turning of AISI H13 steel with ceramic tools based on tool geometry: surface roughness, tool wear and their relation

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, hard turning is one of the most important processes for both industry and researchers to substitute traditional grinding operations. The present study shows an experimental investigation on the turning of AISI H13 steel with ceramic tools: conventional and wiper. Wiper geometry has as main objective obtained a smoother surface after the cutting process. Turning tests were performed to evaluate the evolution of the surface roughness and tool wear; and the influence of the flank wear on the surface roughness. A slightly better performance of wiper tools was observed for the flank wear, while no clear trend was observed when analysing the surface roughness. In most of the cases, wiper tools provided better surface roughness than conventional tools but not for all the cases. In addition, the difference in the obtained results varied widely depending on the machining length. Finally, no clear relation was found between the flank wear and the surface roughness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galoppi GS, Filho MS, Batalha GF (2006) Hard turning of tempered DIN 100Cr6 steel with coated and no coated CBN inserts. J Mater Process Technol 179:146–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Petropoulos G, Pandazaras C (2003) Evaluating the real profile length in turning of carbon steels. Ind Lubr Tribol 55(3):128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Astakhov VP (2011) Machining of hard materials—definitions and industrial applications. In: Davim JP (ed) Machining of hard materials. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer R, Köhler J, Denkena B (2012) Influence of the tool corner radius on the tool wear and process forces during hard turning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:933–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sahoo AK, Sahoo B (2012) Experimental investigations on machinability aspects in finish hard turning of AISI 4340 steel using uncoated and multilayer coated carbide inserts. Measurement 45:2153–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tönshoff HK, Arendt C, Amor RB (2000) Cutting of hardened steel. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 49(2):547–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karpuschewski B, Schmidt K, Prilukova J, Beňo J, Maňková I, Hieu NT (2013) Influence of tool edge preparation on performance of ceramic tool inserts when hard turning. J Mater Process Technol 213:1978–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davim JP, Figueira L (2007) Machinability evaluation in hard turning of cold work tool steel (D2) with ceramic tools using statistical techniques. Mater Des 28:1186–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2002) Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 43(8):833–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horváth R, Czifra A, Drégelyi-Kiss Á (2015) Effect of conventional and non-conventional tool geometries to skewness and kurtosis of surface roughness in case of fine turning of aluminium alloys with diamond tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Radhika N, Subramaniam R, Babudevasenapathi S (2013) Machining parameter optimisation of an aluminium hybrid metal matrix composite by statistical modelling. Ind Lubr Tribol 65(6):425–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Özel T, Hsu TK, Zeren E (2005) Effects of cutting edge geometry, workpiece hard-ness, feed rate and cutting speed on surface roughness and forces in finish turning of hardened AISI H13 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25(3–4):262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thiele JD, Melkote SN, Peascoe RA, Watkins TR (2000) Effect of cutting-edge geometry and workpiece hardness on surface residual stresses in finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. J Manuf Sci Eng 122(4):642–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh D, Rao PV (2007) optimization of tool geometry and cutting parameters for hard turning. Mater Manuf Process 22(1):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Correia AE, Davim JP (2011) Surface roughness measurement in turning carbon steel AISI 1045 using wiper inserts. Measurement 44:1000–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Coromant S (2010) Metal cutting technology. Technical guide. Elanders, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grzesik W, Wanat T (2006) Surface finish generated in hard turning of quenched alloy steel parts using conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 46:1988–1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Figueira L, Davim JP (2009) Machinability investigations in hard turning of AISI D2 cold work tool steel with conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 27:754–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elbah M, Yallese MA, Aouici H, Mabrouki T, Rigal JF (2013) Comparative assessment of wiper and conventional ceramic tools on surface roughness in hard turning AISI 4140 steel. Measurement 46:3041–3056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Madić M, Radovanović M (2013) Modeling and analysis of correlations between cutting parameters and cutting force components in turning AISI 1043 steel using ANN. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 35:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bouacha K, Yallese MA, Khamel S, Belhadi S (2014) Analysis and optimization of hard turning operation using cubic boron nitride tool. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 45:160–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Figueira L, Davim JP (2011) Performance comparison of conventional and wiper ceramic inserts in hard turning through artificial neural network modelling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grzesik W, Zalisz Z (2008) Wear phenomenon in the hard steel machining using ceramic tools. Tribol Int 41:802–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grzesik W (2008) Influence of tool wear on surface roughness in hard turning using differently shaped ceramic tools. Wear 265:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guddat J, M’Saoubi R, Alm P, Meyer D (2011) Hard turning of AISI 52100 using PCBN wiper geometry inserts and the resulting surface integrity. Procedia Eng 19:118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Grzesik W, Wanat T (2006) Surface finish generated in hard turning of quenched alloy steel parts using conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 46(15):1988–1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferreira R, Carou D, Lauro CH, Davim JP (2016) Surface roughness investigation in the hard turning of steel using ceramic tools. Mater Manuf Process 31(5):648–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boothroyd G, Knight W (1989) Fundamentals of machining and machine tools. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shaw M (2004) Metal cutting principles. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jianxin D, Lili L, Jianhua L, Jinlong Z, Xuefeng Y (2005) Failure mechanisms of TiB2 particle and SiC whisker reinforced Al2O3 ceramic cutting tools when machining nickel-based alloys. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 45:1393–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Özel T, Karpat Y, Figueira L, Davim JP (2007) Modelling of surface finish and tool flank wear in turning of AISI D2 steel with ceramic wiper inserts. J Mater Process Technol 189:192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Marksberry PW, Jawahir IS (2008) A comprehensive tool-wear/tool-life performance model in the evaluation of NDM (near dry machining) for sustainable manufacturing. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 48(7):878–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Suresh R, Basavarajappa S, Samuel GL (2012) Some studies on hard turning of AISI 4340 steel using multilayer coated carbide tool. Measurement 45:1872–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chinchanikar S, Choudhury SK (2015) Machining of hardened steel—experimental investigations, performance modelling and cooling techniques: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 89:95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Figueira L, Davim JP (2009) Analysis of machinability during hard turning of cold work tool steel (type: AISI D2). Mater Manuf Process 24(12):1373–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Noordin MY, Zainal AM, Kurniawan D (2008) Hard turning of cold work tool steel using wiper ceramic tool. JMek 25:92–105

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rech J, Moisan A (2003) Surface integrity in finish hard turning of case-hardened steels. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 43:543–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Aouici H, Yallese MA, Chaoui K, Mabrouki T, Rigal JF (2012) Analysis of surface roughness and cutting force components in hard turning with CBN tool: prediction model and cutting conditions optimization. Measurement 45:344–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Klocke F, Brinksmeier E, Weinert K (2005) Capability profile of hard cutting and grinding processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54(2):22–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Carou D, Rubio EM, Lauro CH, Davim JP (2014) Experimental investigation on surface finish during intermittent turning of UNS M11917 magnesium alloy under dry and near dry machining conditions. Measurement 56:136–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mason RL, Gunst RF, Hess JL (2003) Statistical design and analysis of experiments: with applications to engineering and science. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang J, Liang SY (2007) Process optimization of finish turning of hardened steels. Mater Manuf Process 22(1):107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lima JG, Ávila RF, Abrão AM, Faustino M, Davim JP (2005) Hard turning: AISI 4340 high strength low alloy steel and AISI D2 cold work tool steel. J Mater Process Technol 169:388–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is based upon work sponsored by Project “Regionální technologický institut” No. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0093. The authors would like to thank the University of the Aveiro for providing the facilities and equipment to perform the tests. They would also like to thank the support given by the Machining & Tribology (MACTRIB) Research Group of the University of Aveiro.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Carou.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Márcio Bacci da Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, R., Řehoř, J., Lauro, C.H. et al. Analysis of the hard turning of AISI H13 steel with ceramic tools based on tool geometry: surface roughness, tool wear and their relation. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38, 2413–2420 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0504-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0504-z

Keywords

Navigation