Robustified GPC controller based on H robust control for an hydraulic actuator

  • Mohammed Aidoud
  • Moussa Sedraoui
  • Abderrazek Lachouri
  • Abdelhalim Boualleg
Technical Paper

Abstract

This paper proposes the robustification method of primary generalized predictive control GPC for a hydraulic actuator, which is previously modeled by an uncertain plant. Three-step procedures should be followed for robustification: First, the primary GPC controller based on nominal plant is designed to ensure a better tracking dynamic of the closed-loop system. Second, the Q-parameter transfer function is determined from solving the weighted-mixed sensitivity problem using the two Riccati equations where the uncertainty plant and neglected dynamics are taken into account. Finally, the Youla parameterization combines the primary GPC controller and Q-parameter to design the robustified GPC controller which enhances the trade-off robustness of primary GPC controller without changing its better tracking dynamic. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed robustification, the hydraulic actuator, which presents a realistic process, is controlled by both primary and robustified GPC controllers where their simulation results are compared in time and frequency domains by those given by the H controller.

Keywords

H control Hydraulic actuators Predictive control Robust control Two-term control 

References

  1. 1.
    Camacho EF, Bordons C (2007) Model predictive control. Springer, London, pp 81–126MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camacho EF, Berenguel M, Rubio FR (1997) Advanced control of solar plants. Springer, London, pp 81–151Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morari M, Lee JH (1999) Model predictive control: past, present and future. Comput Chem Eng 23:667–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Durmu B, Temurta H, Yumuak N, Temurta F (2009) A study on industrial robotic manipulator model using model based predictive controls. J Intell Manuf 20:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhenkai Guo, Xinping Guan (2015) Nonlinear generalized predictive control based on online least squares support vector machines. Nonlinear Dyn 79:1163–1168MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clarke DW, Mohtadi C, Tuffs PS (1987) Generalized predictive control-part I: the basic algorithm. Automatica 23:137–160CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tan KK, Lee TH, Huang SN, Leu FM (2001) Adaptive-predictive control of a class of SISO nonlinear systems. Dyn Control 11:151–174MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scattolini R, Schiavoni N (1992) A note on multivariable generalized predictive control. Int J Control 56:253–257MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Susanu M, Dumur D (2006) Validation of predictive axis control structure within a virtual open architecture machine tool. Int J Mach Sci Tech 10:389–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ansay P, Gevers M, Wertz V (1998) Enhancing the robustness of GPC via a simple choice of the youla parameter. Eur J Control 4:64–70CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kouvaritakis E, Rossiter JA, Chang AOT (1992) Stable generalized predictive control: an algorithm with guaranteed stability. IEE Proc D 139:349–362CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoon TW, Clarke DW (1995) Observer design in receding horizon predictive control. Int J Control 61:171–191MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gossner R, Kouvaritakis B, Rossiter JA (1997) Stable generalized predictive control with constraints and bounded disturbances. Automatica 33:551–568MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Olaru S, Rodriguez PA (2006) Robustification of explicit predictive control laws. In: Proceedings of the 45th IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 13–15Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stoica C, Rodriguez PA, Dumur D (2008) MIMOptMPC: a matlabTM toolbox for off-robustification of multivariable MPC. In: IEEE international symposium on computer-aided control system design, Texas, USA, 3–5 Sept 2008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Massimetti M, Zaccarian L, Hu T, Teel AR (2009) Linear discrete time global and regional anti-windup. Int J Control 82:2179–2192MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khelifa KO, Bali N, Nezli L (2014) Off-line robustification of generalized predictive control for uncertain systems. Arch Control Sci 24:499–513MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Youla D, Jabr H, Bongiorno J (1976) Modern wiener-hopf design of optimal controllers. IEEE Trans Autom Control 21:319–338MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sarath SN (2011) Automatic weight selection algorithm for designing H infinity controller for active magnetic bearing. Int J Eng Sci Tech 3(1):122–138Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sedraoui M, Gherbi S, Abdelmalek S (2012) A robust controller based on fractional structure for MIMO plant with multiple delays. Control Intell Syst 40:83–94MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chiang RY, Safonov MG (1988) Robust-control toolbox user’s guide. The Math Works Inc, NatickGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammed Aidoud
    • 1
    • 3
  • Moussa Sedraoui
    • 2
  • Abderrazek Lachouri
    • 3
  • Abdelhalim Boualleg
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratory of Automatic and Informatics of Guelma (LAIG)GuelmaAlgeria
  2. 2.Department of Electronic and TelecommunicationUniversity 08 May 1945GuelmaAlgeria
  3. 3.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity 20 Août 1955SkikdaAlgeria

Personalised recommendations