Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A neuro-genetic approach to the optimal design of gear-blank lightening holes

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite its significant effect on the weight and dynamic performance of a gear system, the topology of the gear blanks, including the geometry and dimensions of the hub, the web and the spokes, has not been systematically studied. The occasional investigations of the subject have been mainly experimental and/or based on simplifying assumptions. This paper presents a simulation-based approach to the optimal shape design of gear-blank lightening holes. A set of parametric curves is used to describe the hole geometry. The optimum coordinates of the curves’ vertices are then determined through a multi-objective optimization procedure that would minimize the weight of the gear and the maximum-to-minimum stress ratio while satisfying strength and performance requirements. As its function evaluation engine, the optimization algorithm employs a neural network which is trained using results from a uniformly distributed set of FE simulations. Multiple case studies show an average of 23 % weight reduction compared to traditionally designed gear holes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Tan-sigmoid function with the relationship of \(y = \frac{2}{{1 + e^{ - 2x} }} - 1\).

References

  1. Ahn YJ, Kim HO, Lee KY (1998) G1 Arc sp-line approximation of quadratic Bezier curves. Comput Aided Des 30(8):615–620

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanasovska I, Nikolić V (2007) 3D spur gear FEM model for the numerical calculation of face load factor. J Facta Univ Ser 6(1):131–143

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Buiga O, Popa CO (2012) Optimal mass design of a single-stage helical gear unit with genetic algorithms. Proc Rom Acad Ser A Math Phys Tech Sci Inf Sci 13(3):243

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaari F, Fakhfakh T, Haddar M (2009) Analytical modeling of spur gear tooth crack and influence on gear-mesh stiffness. Eur J Mech A Solids 28(3):461–468

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Faggioni M, Samani F, Bertacchi G, Pellicano F (2011) Dynamic optimization of spur gears. J Mech Mach Theory 46(4):544–557

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Farin G (1997) Curves and surfaces for computer aided geometric design: a practical guide. Academic Press, Dublin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg D (1989) Genetic algorithms in search and machine learning, reading. Addison Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guo Yi, Parker RG (2010) Dynamic modeling and analysis of a spur planetary gear involving tooth wedging and bearing clearance nonlinearity. Eur J Mech A Solids. doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.05.001

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta RB (1982) Machine design (mechanical engineering design). Satya Prakashan Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jadhav SV, Wadka SB (2007) Analytical and experimental evaluation of gear tooth stresses with holes in gear body, national conference on advances in materials and manufacturing technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Punjab Engineering College, Deemed University, Chandigarh (UT), India, 375-379

  11. Jain LC, Vemuri VR (eds) (1999) Industrial applications of neural networks. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kapelevich A, Shekhtman Y (2009) Tooth fillet profile optimization for gears with symmetric and asymmetric teeth. Gear Technology, pp 73–79

  13. Kish JG, Isabelle C (1994) Gear tooth topological modification, US patent, Publication number: 5315790

  14. Li S (2002) Deformation and bending stress analysis of a three-dimensional, thin-rimmed gear. J Mech Design 124:129–135 ISSN 1050-0472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maitra GM, Prasad LV (2004) Handbook of mechanical design, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Radzevich SP (2012) Dudley’s handbook of practical gear design and manufacture, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Savsani V, Rao RV, Vakharia DP (2010) Optimal weight design of a gear train using particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing algorithms. J Mech Mach Theory 45(3):531–541

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Spitas V, Spitas C (2006) Optimising involute gear design for maximum bending strength and equivalent pitting resistance. J Mech Eng Sci 221:479–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang P, Lan Z, Shen XY (2011) Weight reduction design of gear drive based on parameter and structural optimization. J Adv Mater Res ZUG 139(141):1406–1410

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wei Z (2004) Stresses and deformations in involute spur gears by finite element method. M.S.c. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Vahabi.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Lavinia Maria Sanabio Alves Borges.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vahabi, H., Shariat Panahi, M., Shirazinezhad, R.P. et al. A neuro-genetic approach to the optimal design of gear-blank lightening holes. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38, 277–286 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0362-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0362-0

Keywords

Navigation