Skip to main content
Log in

Tool condition monitoring of aluminum oxide grinding wheel in dressing operation using acoustic emission and neural networks

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The grinding operation gives workpieces their final finish, minimizing surface roughness through the interaction between the abrasive grains of a tool (grinding wheel) and the workpiece. However, excessive grinding wheel wear due to friction renders the tool unsuitable for further use, thus requiring the dressing operation to remove and/or sharpen the cutting edges of the worn grains to render them reusable. The purpose of this study was to monitor the dressing operation using the acoustic emission (AE) signal and statistics derived from this signal, classifying the grinding wheel as sharp or dull by means of artificial neural networks. An aluminum oxide wheel installed on a surface grinding machine, a signal acquisition system, and a single-point dresser were used in the experiments. Tests were performed varying overlap ratios and dressing depths. The root mean square values and two additional statistics were calculated based on the raw AE data. A multilayer perceptron neural network was used with the Levenberg–Marquardt learning algorithm, whose inputs were the aforementioned statistics. The results indicate that this method was successful in classifying the conditions of the grinding wheel in the dressing process, identifying the tool as “sharp” (with cutting capacity) or “dull” (with loss of cutting capacity), thus reducing the time and cost of the operation and minimizing excessive removal of abrasive material from the grinding wheel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xue L, Naghdy F, Cook C (2002) Monitoring of wheel dressing operations for precision grinding. IEEE Int Conf Ind Technol 2:1296–1299

  2. Marinescu ID, Hitchiner M, Uhlmann E, Rowe WB, Inasaki I (2007) Handbook of machining with grinding wheels, 1st edn. London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wegener K, Hooffmeister HW, Hooffmeister B, Karpuschewski F, Kuster W, Hahmann C, Rabiey M (2011) Conditioning and monitoring of grinding wheels. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(2):757–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malkin S, Guo C (2008) Grinding technology: theory and applications of machining with abrasives, chap 4, 2nd edn. Industrial Press, New York, p 372

  5. Linke B (2008) Dressing process model for vitrified bonded grinding wheels. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):345–348. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hassui A, Diniz AE (2003) Correlating surface roughness and vibration on plunge cylindrical grinding of steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:855–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rowe WB (2009) Grinding wheel dressing. In: Rowe WB (ed) Principles of modern grinding technology. William Andrew Publishing, Boston, pp 59–78

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson MJ, Khangar A, Chenc X, Robinson GM, Venkatesh VC, Dahotre NB (2007) Laser cleaning and dressing of vitrified grinding wheels. J Mater Process Technol 185:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakayama K, Takagi J, Irie Etsuo, Okuno K (1980) Sharpness evaluation of grinding wheel face by the grinding of steel ball. Ann CIRP 29:227–231

  10. Coelho RT (1991) Experimental study on the dressing depth of grinding wheels in precision grinding using the ground disc method. University of Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bianchi EC, Aguiar PR, Poggi MR, Salgado MH, Freitas CA, Bianchi ARR (2003) Estudo do Desgaste Abrasivo das Resinas Compostas Disponíveis no Mercado Brasileiro (Study on abrasive wear of composite resins in the Brazilian market). Mater Res 6(2):255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Z, Yu Z (2012) Grinding wheel wear monitoring based on wavelet analysis and support vector machine. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:107–121. doi:10.1007/s00170-011-3797-1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee DE, Hwang I, Valente CMO, Oliveira JFG, Dornfeld DA (2006) Precision manufacturing process monitoring with acoustic emission. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:176–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mokbel A, Maksoud TMA (2000) Monitoring of the condition of diamond grinding wheels using acoustic emission technique. J Mater Process Technol 101:292–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Z, Willett P, Aguiar PR, Webster J (2001) Neural network detection grinding burn from acoustic emission. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:283–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts TM, Talebzadeh M (2003) Acoustic emission monitoring of fatigue crack propagation. J Constr Steel Res 59(6):695–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Center NR (2012) Introduction to acoustic emission testing. http://www.ndt-ed.org/index_flash.htm

  18. Kwak JS, Ha M (2004) Neural network approach for diagnosis of grinding operation by acoustic emission and power signals. J Mater Process Technol 147:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lezanski P (2001) An intelligent system for grinding wheel condition monitoring. J Mater Process Technol 109:258–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Balazinski M, Czogala E, Jemielniak K, Leski J (2002) Tool condition monitoring using artificial intelligence methods. Eng Appl Artif Intell 15:73–80

  21. Abu-Mahfouz I (2003) Drilling wear detection and classification using vibration signals and artificial neural network. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:707–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nandi AK, Banerjee MK (2005) FBF-NN-based modelling of cylindrical plunge grinding process using a GA. J Mater Process Technol 162–163:655–664. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pontes FJ, Paiva AP, Balestrassi PP, Ferreira JR, Silva MB (2012) Optimization of radial basis function neural network employed for prediction of surface roughness in hard turning process using Taguchi’s orthogonal arrays. Expert Syst Appl 39:7776–7787

  24. Cruz CED, Aguiar PR, Machado AR, Bianchi EC, Contrucci JG, Castro Neto F (2012) Monitoring in precision metal drilling process using multi-sensors and neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:1–8

  25. Unser M (2000) Sampling—50 years after Shannon. Proc IEEE 88(4):569–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen X, Rowe B (1996) Analysis and simulation of the grinding process. Generation of the grinding wheel surface. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36(8):872–882

    Google Scholar 

  27. Aguiar PR, Souza AGO, Bianchi EC, Leite RR, Dotto FRL (2009) Monitoring the dressing operation in the grinding process. Int J Mach Mach Mater 5(1):3–22

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dornfeld D, Cai HG (1984) An investigation of grinding and wheel loading using acoustic emission. J Eng Ind 106:28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar R, Bhondekar AP, Kaur R, Vig S, Sharma A, Kapur P (2012) A simple electronic tongue. Sens Actuators 171–172:1046–1053

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. R. Aguiar.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Alexandre Mendes Abrao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moia, D.F.G., Thomazella, I.H., Aguiar, P.R. et al. Tool condition monitoring of aluminum oxide grinding wheel in dressing operation using acoustic emission and neural networks. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 37, 627–640 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-014-0191-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-014-0191-6

Keywords

Navigation