Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Skill-Based Electronic Gaming Machines: a Review of Product Structures, Risks of Harm, and Policy Issues

  • Gambling (L Clark, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Addiction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Skill-based gaming machines (SGMs) add interactive and/or skill features to electronic gaming machines (EGMs), often modelled on elements from arcade, video, online, or mobile games. Availability of SGMs is expanding in the USA and internationally, but evidence of the impacts of these machines is lacking. To provide direction to policymakers and the scientific community, this review critically evaluates the relevant literature and suggests future avenues for research and consumer protection measures.

Recent Findings

Early data suggests that SGMs are most appealing to younger demographics and are likely to attract participation from regular gambling or gaming populations, potentially those with pre-existing problems. Studies of skill elements within other gambling activities indicate that players tend to overestimate their level of control in gambling situations that are determined by chance. Skill involved in SGMs could elicit illusions of control in players, which may contribute to the development of gambling problems.

Summary

The impact of introducing SGMs is still relatively unknown. There is limited robust ecologically valid research on the use of these machines within gambling venues. It is possible that, like other new gambling activities, the introduction of SGMs may lead to harm. Vulnerable populations may include young adults, those with pre-existing problems, and those already involved in gambling and video/mobile gaming. Preliminary consumer protection strategies include player education techniques and account management tools, paired with an empirical evaluation framework. Future studies, including laboratory and field trials, are needed to examine if SGMs more strongly appeal to at-risk gamblers, to determine whether players recognise skill versus chance components, and understand the relationship between involvement, increased cognitive distortions, and problem gambling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. •• Delfabbro P, King D, Gainsbury SM. Understanding gambling and gaming skill and its implications for the convergence of gaming with electronic gaming machines. International Gambling Studies [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 22]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2019.1662824This conceptual review paper investigates the meaning of skill in gambling and how it has been incorporated into novel skill-based gaming machines. Using examples drawn from newly released machines, the authors identify two key typologies: (1) skill-based gaming machines where skill influences the return to player percentage but not above 100%, (2) skill-based gaming machines that allow a small proportion of highly skilled players to reach a return to player percentage above 100%.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parker L. Casinos look to video games as a draw for millennials. The New York Times [Internet]. 2016 Jul 6 [cited 2019 Oct 24]; Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/technology/personaltech/casinos-look-to-video-games-as-a-draw-for-millennials.html

  3. Queensland Treasury and Trade. Australian Gambling Statistics 1989–90 to 2016–17. Queensland: Government Statistician, Queensland Treasury and Trade; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong AR, Thomas A, Abbott M. Gambling participation, expenditure and risk of harm in Australia, 1997–1998 and 2010–2011. J Gambl Stud. 2018;34:255–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Joyner C. Video gambling: Georgia jackpot or bust? The Atlanta Journal-Constitution [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Nov 6]; Available from: https://www.ajc.com/news/state%2D%2Dregional-govt%2D%2Dpolitics/video-gambling-georgia-jackpot-bust/5cYK4yeKNMOB5Jn2o1biXO/

  6. Larche C, Stange M, Harrigan K, Brown DG, Dixon MJ. Evidence exchange: the current state of skill-based gambling in North America: Final report [Internet]. Ontario: Gambling Research Exchange Ontario (GREO); 2016. Available from: https://www.greo.ca/Modules/EvidenceCentre/files/Larche%20et%20al%20(2016)%20Evidence%20Exchange%20-%20The%20current%20state%20of%20skill-based%20gambling%20in%20North%20America.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  7. Toscano N. Pokie makers working on new machines to target gamer generation [Internet]. The Sydney Morning Herald. 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available from: https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/pokie-makers-working-on-new-machines-to-target-gamer-generation-20180831-p500ys.html

  8. Oliver N. As Virginia gears up for gambling debate, thousands of slot-like games have already slipped in the back door. Virginia Mercury [Internet]. 2018 Dec 20 [cited 2019 Oct 22]; Available from: https://www.virginiamercury.com/2018/12/20/as-virginia-gears-up-for-gambling-debate-thousands-of-slot-like-games-have-already-slipped-in-the-back-door/

  9. Anderson A. Game over for GotSkill in Ontario [Internet]. NetNewsLedger. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 28]. Available from: http://www.netnewsledger.com/2019/08/16/game-over-for-gotskill-in-ontario/

  10. Tadman J On the hunt for Canadian gaming bigfoot: quasi-gambling games of skill in Canada. Canadian Gaming Lawyer Magazine [Internet]. 2019; Available from: https://www.imgl.org/sites/default/files/media/onthehunt_tadman.pdf

  11. Toscano N. “Skill-based” slot machine maker GameCo has eyes on Australian gamblers [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 22]. Available from: https://www.smh.com.au/business/skillbased-slot-machine-maker-gameco-has-eyes-on-australian-gamblers-20170724-gxh8tp.html

  12. Hodgins DC, Stea JN, Grant JE. Gambling disorders. Lancet. 2011;378:1874–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Turner N, Horbay R. How do slot machines and other electronic gambling machines actually work? Journal of Gambling Issues [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2019 Nov 26]. Available from: http://jgi.camh.net/index.php/jgi/article/view/3654

  14. Horridge K. Industry still has high hopes for skill-based machines despite slow start [Internet]. Casino.org. 2017 [cited 2019 Oct 29]. Available from: https://www.casino.org/news/industry-still-has-high-hopes-for-skill-based-machines-despite-slow-start

  15. GameCo. GameCo “GEN 3” whitepaper video game gambling machine (VGM). Las Vegas, NV; 2019.

  16. Suh E, Alhaery M, Abarbanel B, McKenna A. Examining millennials’ online gambling behavior: a comparison of generational differences. J Hosp Tour Technol. 2017;8:314–36.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abbott M, Romild U, Volberg R. The prevalence, incidence, and gender and age-specific incidence of problem gambling: results of the Swedish longitudinal gambling study (Swelogs). Addiction. 2018;113:699–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gainsbury S, Russell A, Hing N, Wood R, Lubman DI, Blaszczynski A. The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in Australia: assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28:769–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Welte JW, Barnes GM, Tidwell M-CO, Hoffman JH, Wieczorek WF. Gambling and problem gambling in the United States: changes between 1999 and 2013. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31:695–715.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Binde P, Romild U, Volberg RA. Forms of gambling, gambling involvement and problem gambling: evidence from a Swedish population survey. Int Gambl Stud. 2017;17:490–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gainsbury SM, Abarbanel B, Blaszczynski A. Intensity and gambling harms: exploring breadth of gambling involvement among esports bettors. Gaming Law Rev. 2017;21:610–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. LaPlante DA, Nelson SE, LaBrie RA, Shaffer HJ. Disordered gambling, type of gambling and gambling involvement in the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007. Eur J Pub Health. 2011;21:532–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Philander KS, MacKay T-L. Online gambling participation and problem gambling severity: is there a causal relationship? Int Gambl Stud. 2014;14:214–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Phillips JG, Ogeil R, Chow Y-W, Blaszczynski A. Gambling involvement and increased risk of gambling problems. J Gambl Stud. 2013;29:601–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gainsbury S. Online gambling addiction: the relationship between internet gambling and disordered gambling. Curr Addict Rep. 2015;2:185–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Macey J, Hamari J. eSports, skins and loot boxes: participants, practices and problematic behaviour associated with emergent forms of gambling. New Media Soc. 2019;21:20–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Martin RJ, Nelson S. Fantasy sports, real money: exploration of the relationship between fantasy sports participation and gambling-related problems. Addict Behav. 2014;39:1377–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. •• Gainsbury SM, Philander KS, Grattan G. Skill gambling machines and electronic gaming machines: Irrational cognitions and understanding of the role of skill. 2020. Available from: https://osf.io/2g57uThis empirical paper is based on surveys of a casino patron and Mechanical Turk sample in US jurisdictions with access to skill-based gaming machines. Participants with previous experience playing skill-based gaming machines were more likely to be younger, mobile game players, or gamblers with existing problems. Findings suggest that skill-based gaming machine products may appeal to these at-risk groups.

  29. Gainsbury SM, Russell A, Wood R, Hing N, Blaszczynski A. How risky is Internet gambling? A comparison of subgroups of Internet gamblers based on problem gambling status. New Media Soc. 2015;17:861–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gainsbury SM. Gaming-gambling convergence: research, regulation, and reactions. Gaming Law Rev. 2019;23:80–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gainsbury SM, Russell AMT, King DL, Delfabbro P, Hing N. Migration from social casino games to gambling: motivations and characteristics of gamers who gamble. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;63:59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim HS, Wohl MJA, Salmon MM, Gupta R, Derevensky J. Do social casino gamers migrate to online gambling? An assessment of migration rate and potential predictors. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31:1819–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Veselka L, Wijesingha R, Leatherdale ST, Turner NE, Elton-Marshall T. Factors associated with social casino gaming among adolescents across game types. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zendle D, Cairns P. Loot boxes are again linked to problem gambling: results of a replication study. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0213194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Productivity Commission. Gambling: productivity commission inquiry report [Internet]. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2010. Available from: http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/gambling-2009/report

    Google Scholar 

  36. Landon J, du Palmer Preez K, Page A, Bellringer M, Roberts A, Abbott M. Electronic gaming machine characteristics: it’s the little things that count. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2018;16:251–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Harris A, Griffiths MD. The impact of speed of play in gambling on psychological and behavioural factors: a critical review. J Gambl Stud. 2018;34:393–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramnerö J, Molander O, Lindner P, Carlbring P. What can be learned about gambling from a learning perspective? A narrative review. Nordic Psychol. 2019;71:303–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dixon MJ, Graydon C, Harrigan KA, Wojtowicz L, Siu V, Fugelsang JA. The allure of multi-line games in modern slot machines. Addiction. 2014;109:1920–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Murch WS, Clark L. Effects of bet size and multi-line play on immersion and respiratory sinus arrhythmia during electronic gaming machine use. Addict Behav. 2019;88:67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schluter MG, Hodgins DC. Dissociative experiences in gambling disorder. Curr Addict Rep. 2019;6:34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. • Gainsbury SM, Philander KS, Grattan G. Predicting intention to play random and skill-based electronic gambling machines using the Theory of Reasoned Action. J Gambl Stud [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 27]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09915-3This empirical paper is based on two studies of casino patrons and adult residents of US jurisdictions where skill-based gaming machine are legally available. The theory of reasoned action was applied to explain participants’ motivation to play skill-based gaming machines. Consistent with the theory, results showed that positive attitudes towards play and positive subjective norms predicted behavioural intention to play.

  43. Langer EJ. The illusion of control. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975;32:311–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. • Ejova A, Ohtsuka K. Erroneous gambling-related beliefs emerge from broader beliefs during problem-solving: a critical review and classification scheme. Thinking & Reasoning [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Jun 18]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1590233This paper critically reviews the literature on erroneous gambling-related belief and proposes a classification scheme based on cognitive science theory. Illusions of control are conceptualised as a product of problem-solving processes directed at beating the house that are maintained by general beliefs about supernatural forces and the nature of randomness. This has implications for skill-based gaming machines players that may develop erroneous beliefs about their ability to master or beat the incorporated skill features (and make money) which could lead to onset of gambling problems.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fortune EE, Goodie AS. Cognitive distortions as a component and treatment focus of pathological gambling: a review. Psychol Addict Behav. 2012;26:298–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Davis D, Sundahl I, Lesbo M. Illusory personal control as a determinant of bet size and type in casino craps games. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2000;30:1224–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Fleming JH, Darley JM. The purposeful-action sequence and the “illusion of control”: the effects of foreknowledge and target involvement on observers’ judgments of others’ control over random events. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1990;16:346–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Toneatto T. Cognitive psychopathology of problem gambling. Subst Use Misuse. 1999;34:1593–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Orgaz C, Estévez A, Matute H. Pathological gamblers are more vulnerable to the illusion of control in a standard associative learning task. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2015 Dec 17];4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3683617/

  50. Blaszczynski A, Nower L. A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction. 2002;97:487–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Clark L, Averbeck B, Payer D, Sescousse G, Winstanley CA, Xue G. Pathological choice: the neuroscience of gambling and gambling addiction. J Neurosci. 2013;33:17617–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Sharpe L. A reformulated cognitive–behavioral model of problem gambling: a biopsychosocial perspective. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002;22:1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Chrétien M, Giroux I, Goulet A, Jacques C, Bouchard S. Cognitive restructuring of gambling-related thoughts: a systematic review. Addict Behav. 2017;75:108–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. • King DL, Ejova A, Delfabbro PH. Illusory control, gambling, and video gaming: an investigation of regular gamblers and video game players. J Gambl Stud. 2012;28:421–35 This paper includes two studies examine video game play, cognitive distortions, and gambling problems. Among gamblers, the authors find an association between increased video game play and gambling-related illusions of control.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ladouceur R, Sevigny S. Interactive messages on video lottery terminals and persistence in gambling. Gambl Res. 2003;15:45–9.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bristow LA, Bilevicius E, Stewart SH, Goldstein AL, Keough MT. Solitary gambling mediates the risk pathway from anxiety sensitivity to excessive gambling: evidence from a longitudinal ecological momentary assessment study. Psychol Addict Behav. 2018;32:689–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hing N, Holdsworth L, Tiyce M, Breen H. Stigma and problem gambling: current knowledge and future research directions. Int Gambl Stud. 2014;14:64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Dowling NA, Merkouris SS, Greenwood CJ, Oldenhof E, Toumbourou JW, Youssef GJ. Early risk and protective factors for problem gambling: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017;51:109–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Stewart MJ, Wohl MJ. Pop-up messages, dissociation, and craving: how monetary limit reminders facilitate adherence in a session of slot machine gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27:268–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Murch WS, Chu SWM, Clark L. Measuring the slot machine zone with attentional dual tasks and respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31:375–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Murch WS, Limbrick-Oldfield EH, Ferrari MA, MacDonald KI, Fooken J, Cherkasova MV, et al. Zoned in or zoned out? Investigating immersion in slot machine gambling using mobile eye-tracking. Addiction. 2019. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/add.14899

  62. Wood RTA, Wohl MJA, Tabri N, Philander K. Measuring responsible gambling amongst players: development of the positive play scale. Front Psychol. 2017;8:A227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hing N, Russell AMT, Hronis A. A definition and set of principles for responsible consumption of gambling. Int Gambl Stud. 2018;18:359–82.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wohl MJA, Parush A, Kim HS, Warren K. Building it better: applying human–computer interaction and persuasive system design principles to a monetary limit tool improves responsible gambling. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;37:124–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Monaghan S, Blaszczynski A. Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2010;26:67–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Gainsbury S, Aro D, Ball D, Tobar C, Russell A. Determining optimal placement for pop-up messages: evaluation of a live trial of dynamic warning messages for electronic gaming machines. Int Gambl Stud. 2015;15:141–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Keen B, Anjoul F, Blaszczynski A. How learning misconceptions can improve outcomes and youth engagement with gambling education programs. J Behav Addict. 2019;8:372–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Petry NM, Ginley MK, Rash CJ. A systematic review of treatments for problem gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31:951–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science Faculty, Brain and Mind Centre, School of Psychology, Gambling Treatment and Research Clinic, University of Sydney, 94 Mallet St, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia

    Dylan Pickering, Kahlil S. Philander & Sally M. Gainsbury

  2. Carson College of Business, School of Hospitality Business Management, Washington State University, 915 North Broadway, Everett, WA, 98201, USA

    Kahlil S. Philander

Authors
  1. Dylan Pickering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kahlil S. Philander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sally M. Gainsbury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kahlil S. Philander.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Gambling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pickering, D., Philander, K.S. & Gainsbury, S.M. Skill-Based Electronic Gaming Machines: a Review of Product Structures, Risks of Harm, and Policy Issues. Curr Addict Rep 7, 229–236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-020-00309-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-020-00309-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation