The Assessment of Cyberchondria: Instruments for Assessing Problematic Online Health-Related Research


Purpose of Review

Cyberchondria is a problematic, i.e. distressing or anxiety-increasing pattern of online health information seeking. The development of psychometrically sound instruments for the assessment of cyberchondria is imperative for better understanding of this construct. The aim of the present article is to provide a systematic literature review of cyberchondria instruments.

Recent Findings

Although several measures of cyberchondria have been developed, the Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS) has been used most often. The CSS is based on a solid theoretical framework, with very good to excellent reliability and validity. It has been translated into several languages. Modifications of the original version of the CSS have been introduced to refine its conceptual foundation and improve its utility by making it shorter.


Further improvement of the CSS may boost the quality of cyberchondria research. There remains a need to test the theoretical underpinnings of the CSS and consider alternative models of cyberchondria.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.

    Starcevic V, Berle D. Cyberchondria: towards a better understanding of excessive health-related Internet use. Exp Rev Neurotherap. 2013;13:205–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Starcevic V. Cyberchondria: challenges of problematic online searches for health-related information. Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86:129–33.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    McElroy E, Shevlin M. The development and initial validation of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS). J Anxiety Disord. 2014;28:259–65.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fergus TA. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): an examination of structure and relations with health anxiety in a community sample. J Anxiety Disord. 2014;28:504–10.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Norr AM, Allan NP, Boffa JW, Raines AM, Schmidt NB. Validation of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): replication and extension with bifactor modeling. J Anxiety Disord. 2015;31:58–64.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Norr AM, Albanese BJ, Oglesby ME, Allan NP, Schmidt NB. Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty as potential risk factors for cyberchondria. J Affect Disord. 2015;174:64–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    •• McElroy E, Kearney M, Touhey J, Evans J, Cooke Y, Shevlin M. The CSS-12: development and validation of a short-form version of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019;22:330–5. study demonstrates how the identified shortcomings of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale were addressed to create a shorter and more conceptually coherent version of the instrument, without sacrificing its solid psychometric properties.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Starcevic V, Baggio S, Berle D, Khazaal Y, Viswasam K. Cyberchondria and its relationships with related constructs: a network analysis. Psychiatr Q. 2019;90:491–505.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    •• Newby JM, McElroy E. The impact of internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for health anxiety on cyberchondria. J Anxiety Disord. 2020;69:102150. is the first study in which the Cyberchondria Severity Scale was used to monitor changes in cyberchondria during cognitive-behavioural therapy for health anxiety. The levels of cyberchondria decreased significantly in patients whose levels of health anxiety were reduced in the course of therapy, reaffirming the relationship between cyberchondria and health anxiety in treatment-seeking individuals.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Barke A, Bleichhardt G, Rief W, Doering BK. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): German validation and development of a short form. Int J Behav Med. 2016;23:595–605.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    • Bajcar B, Babiak J, Olchowska-Kotala A. Cyberchondria and its measurement. The Polish adaptation and psychometric properties of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale CSS-PL. Psychiatr Pol. 2019;53:49–60. is an example of a well-conducted validation study of the translated version of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Uzun SU, Zencir M. Reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of Cyberchondria Severity Scale. Curr Psychol. 2018:1–7.

  14. 14.

    Selvi Y, Turan SG, Sayin AA, Boysan M, Kandeger A. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): validity and reliability study of the Turkish version. Sleep Hypn. 2018;20:241–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zangoulechi Z, Yousefi Z, Keshavarz N. The role of anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in the prediction of cyberchondria. Adv Biosci Clin Med (ABCmed). 2018;6(4):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fergus TA. Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty as potential risk factors for cyberchondria: a replication and extension examining dimensions of each construct. J Affect Disord. 2015;184:305–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Norr AM, Oglesby ME, Raines AM, Macatee RJ, Allan NP, Schmidt NB. Relationships between cyberchondria and obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230:441–6

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Fergus TA, Spada MM. Cyberchondria: examining relations with problematic internet use and metacognitive beliefs. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017;24:1322–30.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Fergus TA, Spada MM. Moving toward a metacognitive conceptualization of cyberchondria: examining the contribution of metacognitive beliefs, beliefs about rituals, and stop signals. J Anxiety Disord. 2018;60:11–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Fergus TA, Russell LH. Does cyberchondria overlap with health anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms? An examination of latent structure and scale interrelations. J Anxiety Disord. 2016;38:88–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mathes BM, Norr AM, Allan NP, Albanese BJ, Schmidt NB. Cyberchondria: overlap with health anxiety and unique relations with impairment, quality of life, and service utilization. Psychiatry Res. 2018;261:204–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gibler RC, Jastrowski Mano KE, O’Bryan EM, Beadel JR, McLeish AC. The role of pain catastrophizing in cyberchondria among emerging adults. Psychol Health Med. 2019;24:1267–76.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bajcar B, Babiak J. Self-esteem and cyberchondria: the mediation effects of health anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in a community sample. Curr Psychol. 2019.

  24. 24.

    Durak-Batigun A, Gor N, Komurcu B, Senkal-Erturk I. Cyberchondria Scale (CS): development, validity and reliability study Dusunen Adam. J Psychiatry Neurol Sci. 2018;31:148–62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jokić-Begić N, Mikac U, Čuržik D, Jokić CS. The development and validation of the Short Cyberchondria Scale (SCS). J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2019;41:662–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    González-Rivera JA, Santiago-Olmo KL, Cruz-Rodríguez AS, Pérez-Ojeda RJ, Torres-Cuevas H. Development and validation of the Brief Cyberchondria Scale in Puerto Rico. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2020;11:36734–7.

  27. 27.

    Tatli Z, Tatli O, Kokoc M. Development and validity of Cyberchondria Tendency Scale. World J Educ Technol: Current Issues. 2019;11:001–9.

  28. 28.

    Singh K, Brown RJ. Health-related internet habits and health anxiety in university students. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2014;27:542–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Vismara M, Caricasole V, Starcevic V, Cinosi E, Dell’Osso B, Martinotti G, et al. Is cyberchondria a new transdiagnostic digital compulsive syndrome? A systematic review of the evidence. Compr Psychiatry. 2020;99:152167.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    da Silva FG, Andrade R, Silva I, Cardoso A. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale for Brazilian Portuguese. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2016;38:90–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Aulia A, Marchira CR, Supriyanto I, Pratiti B. Cyberchondria in first year medical students of Yogyakarta. J Consum Health Internet. 2020;24:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Malik MN, Mustafa MAT, Yaseen M, Ghauri SK, Javaeed A. Assessment of cyberchondria among patients presenting to the emergency department of three hospitals in Islamabad, Pakistan. South Asian J Emerg Med (SAJEM). 2019;2:19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Akhtar M, Fatima T. Exploring cyberchondria and worry about health among individuals with no diagnosed medical condition. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70:90–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Makarla S, Gopichandran V, Tondare D. Prevalence and correlates of cyberchondria among professionals working in the information technology sector in Chennai, India: a cross-sectional study. J Postgrad Med. 2019;65:87–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Dagar D, Kakodkar P, Shetiya SH. Evaluating the cyberchondria construct among computer engineering students in Pune (India) using Cyberchondria severity scale (CSS-15). Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2019;23:117–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wijesinghe CA, Liyanage ULNS, Kapugama KGCL, Warsapperuma WANP, Williams SS, Kuruppuarachchi KALA, et al. “Muddling by googling” – cyberchondria among outpatient attendees of two hospitals in Sri Lanka. SL J Psychiatry. 2019;10:11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Smith GT, McCarthy DM, Anderson KG. On the sins of short-form development. Psychol Assess. 2000;12:102–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladan Starcevic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Technology Addiction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Starcevic, V., Berle, D., Arnáez, S. et al. The Assessment of Cyberchondria: Instruments for Assessing Problematic Online Health-Related Research. Curr Addict Rep 7, 149–165 (2020).

Download citation


  • Cyberchondria
  • Online health information seeking
  • Online health research
  • Assessment
  • Measurement
  • Cyberchondria Severity Scale