Methodological Advances in Leveraging Neuroimaging Datasets in Adolescent Substance Use Research
- 35 Downloads
Purpose of Review
Recent innovations in the statistical analysis of neuroimaging data related to adolescent substance use are highlighted. Going beyond assumptions of homogeneity in small studies of regional localization, the focus is on novel approaches that integrate across regions of the brain and levels of analysis in order to detect individual differences in use along with antecedents and consequences.
Three analysis approaches are considered. Multimodal approaches like the construct-network framework combine neural, behavioral (including cognitive), and self-report indicators to create comprehensive representations of risk factors for adolescent substance use. Machine learning approaches link adolescent substance use to complex patterns of brain activity detected using prediction-focused algorithms. Person-specific approaches reflect heterogeneity in functional brain connectivity associated with adolescent substance use.
When applied to specialized datasets, multimodal, machine learning, and person-specific approaches have significant potential to provide unique insights into the neural processes underlying adolescent substance use.
KeywordsAlcohol use Brain structure and function Machine learning Magnetic resonance imaging Multimodal approaches Person-specific analyses
Alexander Weigard was supported by NIAAA T32 AA007477 (to Dr. Frederick Blow).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
Adriene Beltz and Alexander Weigard declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 3.Johnston LD, Miech RA, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, Patrick ME. Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use 1975-2018: overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2019.Google Scholar
- 15.• Silveri MM, Dager AD, Cohen-Gilbert JE, Sneider JT. Neurobiological signatures associated with alcohol and drug use in the human adolescent brain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;70:244–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.042. Comprehensive review of magnetic resonance imaging studies on adolescent substance use, focusing on alcohol and marijuana use and highlighting limitations and opportunities for future work.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Squeglia LM, Jacobus J, Tapert SF. The effect of alcohol use on human adolescent brain structures and systems. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;125:501–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-62619-6.00028-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Nees F, Tzschoppe J, Patrick CJ, Vollstadt-Klein S, Steiner S, Poustka L, et al. Determinants of early alcohol use in healthy adolescents: the differential contribution of neuroimaging and psychological factors. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(4):986–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2011.282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Paulus MP, Squeglia LM, Bagot K, Jacobus J, Kuplicki R, Breslin FJ, et al. Screen media activity and brain structure in youth: evidence for diverse structural correlation networks from the ABCD study. Neuroimage. 2019;185:140–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Thompson WK, Barch DM, Bjork JM, Gonzalez R, Nagel BJ, Nixon SJ et al. The structure of cognition in 9 and 10 year-old children and associations with problem behaviors: findings from the ABCD study’s baseline neurocognitive battery. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018:100606-. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.12.004.
- 22.Heinrich A, Muller KU, Banaschewski T, Barker GJ, Bokde ALW, Bromberg U, et al. Prediction of alcohol drinking in adolescents: personality-traits, behavior, brain responses, and genetic variations in the context of reward sensitivity. Biol Psychol. 2016;118:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.•• Paulus MP, Thompson WK. The challenges and opportunities of small effects the new normal in academic psychiatry. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(4):353–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4540. Thoughtful commentary on recent indications that clinical neuroscience may be limited by small effects, which may, in turn, make generalizable causal explanations elusive and translational work challenging.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Patrick CJ, Venables NC, Yancey JR, Hicks BM, Nelson LD, Kramer MD. A construct-network approach to bridging diagnostic and physiological domains: application to assessment of externalizing psychopathology. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013;122(3):902–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Venables NC, Hicks BM, Yancey JR, Kramer MD, Nelson LD, Strickland CM, et al. Evidence of a prominent genetic basis for associations between psychoneurometric traits and common mental disorders. Int J Psychophysiol. 2017;115:4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.• Venables NC, Foell J, Yancey JR, Kane MJ, Engle RW, Patrick CJ. Quantifying inhibitory control as externalizing proneness: a cross-domain model. Clin Psychol Sci. 2018;6(4):561–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618757690. Outlines how the construct-network approach can be used to integrate neural, behavioral (including cognitive), and self-report indicators to form a multimodal factor that predicts substance use.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.• Brislin SJ, Patrick CJ, Flor H, Nees F, Heinrich A, Drislane LE, et al. Extending the construct network of trait disinhibition to the neuroimaging domain: validation of a bridging scale for use in the European IMAGEN project. Assessment. 2019;26(4):567–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118759748. Outlines the development and validation of a dimensional measure of trait disinhibition in IMAGEN, facilitating the application of future multimodal factors that include neuroimaging indicators in the dataset. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.• Yarkoni T, Westfall J. Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: lessons from machine learning. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017;12(6):1100–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693393. Discusses the tradeoffs between predictive and explanatory approaches, while advocating for increased emphasis on a predictive approach rooted in the long-held principles of machine learning, and provides an excellent overview of the principles and implementation of machine learning methods. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.•• Whelan R, Watts R, Orr CA, Althoff RR, Artiges E, Banaschewski T, et al. Neuropsychosocial profiles of current and future adolescent alcohol misusers. Nature. 2014;512(7513):185–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13402. Empirical application of a machine learning algorithm for the prediction of adolescent binge drinking behavior to multimodal data in the IMAGEN dataset; models successfully predicted binge drinking at baseline and future time points and generalized to novel data.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Gates KM, Molenaar PCM, Hillary FG, Ram N, Rovine MJ. Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: an alternative to granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM. Neuroimage. 2010;50(3):1118–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.•• Beltz AM, Gates KM. Network mapping with GIMME. Multivar Behav Res. 2017;52(6):789–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1373014. Tutorial on one person-specific approach to the analysis of intensive longitudinal data, such as functional neuroimaging data: group iterative multiple model estimation (GIMME).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Zelle SL, Gates KM, Fiez JA, Sayette MA, Wilson SJ. The first day is always the hardest: functional connectivity during cue exposure and the ability to resist smoking in the initial hours of a quit attempt. Neuroimage. 2017;151:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.• Beltz AM, Gates KM, Engels AS, Molenaar PCM, Pulido C, Turrisi R, et al. Changes in alcohol-related brain networks across the first year of college: a prospective pilot study using fMRI effective connectivity mapping. Addict Behav. 2013;38(4):2052–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.12.023. Empirical application of a person-specific approach (i.e., GIMME) to the analysis of alcohol task-related neuroimaging data from adolescents across the transition to college.CrossRefGoogle Scholar