Current Addiction Reports

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 57–64 | Cite as

Gambling and Homelessness: Prevalence and Pathways

  • Steve SharmanEmail author
Gambling (L Clark, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Gambling


Purpose of Review

The review sought to present research pertaining to gambling and homelessness. Findings mapping the prevalence of disordered gambling within the homeless and those exploring the bi-directional nature of the relationship are discussed. The review explores theoretical explanations for the appeal of gambling to homeless individuals and discusses future directions.

Recent Findings

Research indicates the prevalence of disordered gambling is significantly higher in the homeless, comparable to the general population. Further research indicates that gambling is more commonly a factor contributing to homelessness, that gambling disorders are often overlooked by homeless services, and that support services are often inadequate.


Disordered gambling is common in homelessness; however, the relationship is bi-directional. Gambling can be a direct cause of homelessness, a secondary contributing factor, or only develop after the individual has become homeless. Potential for significant life change is a motivating factor for gambling; for a homeless individual, a small win could be the difference between eating and not eating, or between sleeping in a hostel or on the street. Homeless services can provide a platform for problem identification and direction to the provision of support.


Gambling Homelessness Prevalence Disordered gambling Pathological gambling 


Funding information

Dr. Sharman is currently funded by an Academic Fellowship from the Society for the Study of Addiction. Some of Dr. Sharman’s previous work referenced in this review [67•] was funded by GambleAware. GambleAware is an independent charity tasked to fund research, education and treatment services to help reduce gambling-related harms in Great Britain, funded via voluntary donations from the gambling industry.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Sharman declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies reporting new data with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors. All studies referenced authored by the author of this article were conducted after receiving appropriate ethical approval.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Rose IN. Gambling and the law®: an introduction to the law of internet gambling. UNLV Gaming Res Rev J. 2006;10(1):1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwartz DG. Roll the bones: the history of gambling.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Newall PW. Behavioral complexity of British gambling advertising. Addict Res Theory. 2017;25(6):505–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lopez-Gonzalez H, Griffiths MD. “Cashing out” in sports betting: implications for problem gambling and regulation. Gaming Law Review. 2017;21(4):323–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pitt H, Thomas SL, Bestman A, Stoneham M, Daube M. “It’s just everywhere!” children and parents discuss the marketing of sports wagering in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016;40(5):480–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomas S, Pitt H, Bestman A, Randle M, Daube M, Pettigrew S. Child and parent recall of gambling sponsorship in Australian sport. Victoria: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation; 2016. p. 1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    • Cowlishaw S, Kessler D. Problem gambling in the UK: implications for health, psychosocial adjustment and health care utilization. Eur Addict Res. 2016;22(2):90–8 This paper provides an excellent foundation for understanding the impacts of disordered gambling in the UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ronzitti S, Soldini E, Smith N, Potenza MN, Clerici M, Bowden-Jones H. Current suicidal ideation in treatment-seeking individuals in the United Kingdom with gambling problems. Addict Behav. 2017;74:33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Welte J, Barnes G, Wieczorek W, Tidwell MC, Parker J. Alcohol and gambling pathology among US adults: prevalence, demographic patterns and comorbidity. J Stud Alcohol. 2001;62(5):706–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petry NM. Gambling and substance use disorders: current status and future directions. Am J Addict. 2007;16(1):1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Battersby M, Tolchard B, Scurrah M, Thomas L. Suicide ideation and behaviour in people with pathological gambling attending a treatment service. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2006;4(3):233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roberts A, Landon J, Sharman S, Hakes J, Suomi A, Cowlishaw S. Gambling and physical intimate partner violence: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions (NESARC). Am J Addict. 2018;27(1):7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bramley G, Fitzpatrick S. Homelessness in the UK: who is most at risk? Hous Stud. 2018;33(1):96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Lepage C, Ladouceur R, Jacques C. Prevalence of problem gambling among community service users. Community Ment Health J. 2000 Dec 1;36(6):597–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ladouceur R, Jacques C, Ferland F, Giroux I. Prevalence of problem gambling: a replication study 7 years later. Can J Psychiatr. 1999;44(8):802–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    • Shaffer HJ, Freed CR, Healea D. Gambling disorders among homeless persons with substance use disorders seeking treatment at a community center. Psychiatr Serv. 2002;53(9):1112–7. This study provides an important international measure of gambling in the homeless population, from the USA–7.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shaffer HJ, Hall MN, Vander Bilt J. Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: a research synthesis. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1369–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nower L, Eyrich-Garg KM, Pollio DE, North CS. Problem gambling and homelessness: results from an epidemiologic study. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(2):533–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    • Matheson FI, Devotta K, Wendaferew A, Pedersen C. Prevalence of gambling problems among the clients of a Toronto homeless shelter. J Gambl Stud. 2014;30(2):537–46. This study provides an important international measure of gambling in the homeless population, from Canada–46.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cox BJ, Yu N, Afifi TO, Ladouceur R. A national survey of gambling problems in Canada. Can J Psychiatr. 2005;50(4):213–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    • Sharman S, Dreyer J, Aitken M, Clark L, Bowden-Jones H. Rates of problematic gambling in a British homeless sample: a preliminary study. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(2):525–32 This study provided the first estimate of disordered gambling prevalence in the UK, and is also the study with largest reported sample specifically to identify disordered gambling prevalence in the homeless.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., et al. British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. London (UK): National Centre for Social Research. 2011.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    • Sharman S, Dreyer J, Clark L, Bowden-Jones H. Down and out in London: addictive behaviors in homelessness. J Behav Addict. 2016;5(2):318–24 This study provides a recent estimate of gambling disorder prevalence in a homeless sample, seeks to understand the direction of the relationship, and provides data relating to the provision and utilisation of gambling support services.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lesieur HR, Blume SB. The south oaks gambling screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatr. 1987;144(9).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shaffer HJ, LaBrie R, Scanlan KM, Cummings TN. Pathological gambling among adolescents: Massachusetts gambling screen (MAGS). J Gambl Stud. 1994;10(4):339–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wickwire EM Jr, Burke RS, Brown SA, Parker JD, May RK. Psychometric evaluation of the national opinion research center DSM-IV screen for gambling problems (NODS). Am J Addict. 2008;17(5):392–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Toce-Gerstein M, Gerstein DR, Volberg RA. The NODS–CLiP: a rapid screen for adult pathological and problem gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2009;25(4):541–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ferris J, Wynne H. The Canadian problem gambling index. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Centre on Subst Abus 2001.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pluck G, Nakakarumai M, Sato Y. Homelessness and cognitive impairment: an exploratory study in Tokyo, Japan. East Asian Arch Psychiatr. 2015;25(3):122–7.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    • Thorley C, Stirling A, Huynh E. Cards on the table: the cost to government associated with people who are problem gamblers in Britain. IPPR Report. 2016. This paper provides an excellent estimation of the financial cost of gambling to the UK government across a range of different areas. Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rose A, Maciver C and Davies B. Nowhere fast: the journey in and out of unsupported temporary accommodation, IPPR. (2016) nowhere-fast-the-journey-in-and-out-of-unsupported-temporary-accommodation. Accessed 10th Dec 2018
  33. 33.
    Gattis MN, Cunningham-Williams RM. Housing stability and problem gambling: is there a relationship? J Soc Serv Res. 2011;37(5):490–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Edens EL, Rosenheck RA. Rates and correlates of pathological gambling among VA mental health service users. J Gambl Stud. 2012;28(1):1–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moghaddam JF, Yoon G, Campos MD, Fong TW. Social and behavioral problems among five gambling severity groups. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230(2):143–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Crane M, Byrne K, Fu R, Lipmann B, Mirabelli F, Rota-Bartelink A, et al. The causes of homelessness in later life: findings from a 3-nation study. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005;60(3):S152–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lipmann B, Mirabelli F, Rota-Bartelink A. Homelessness among older people: a comparative study in three countries of prevention and alleviation. Melbourne: Wintringham; 2004.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    van Laere IR, de Wit MA, Klazinga NS. Pathways into homelessness: recently homeless adults problems and service use before and after becoming homeless in Amsterdam. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roberts A, Sharman S, Coid J, Murphy R, Bowden-Jones H, Cowlishaw S, et al. Gambling and negative life events in a nationally representative sample of UK men. Addict Behav. 2017;75:95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nielssen OB, Stone W, Jones NM, Challis S, Nielssen A, Elliott G, et al. Characteristics of people attending psychiatric clinics in inner Sydney homeless hostels. Med J Aust. 2018;208(4):169–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cowlishaw S, Merkouris S, Chapman A, Radermacher H. Pathological and problem gambling in substance use treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abus Treat. 2014;46(2):98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Petry NM, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on alcohol and related conditions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66:564–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Neale J. Homelessness amongst drug users: a double jeopardy explored. Int J Drug Policy. 2001;12(4):353–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shelton K, Taylor P, Bonner A, van den Bree M. Risk factors for homelessness: evidence from a population-based study. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60(4):465–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Michalczuk R, Bowden-Jones H, Verdejo-Garcia A, Clark L. Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in pathological gamblers attending the UK National Problem Gambling Clinic: a preliminary report. Psychol Med. 2011;41(12):2625–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    De Wit H. Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol. 2009;14(1):22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Marczinski CA, Abroms BD, Van Selst M, Fillmore MT. Alcohol-induced impairment of behavioral control: differential effects on engaging vs. disengaging responses. Psychopharmacology. 2005;182(3):452–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sher KJ, Trull TJ. Personality and disinhibitory psychopathology: alcoholism and antisocial personality disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994;103(1):92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    O'Callaghan B, Dominian L, Evans A, Dix J, Smith R, Williams P, Zimmeck M. Study of homeless applicants. HM Stationery Office; 1996.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    • Haushofer J, Fehr E. On the psychology of poverty. Science. 2014;344(6186):862–7 Paper provides a important foundation and fascinating perspective on the how living in and experiencing poverty can influence human cognition and behaviour.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kemp PA, Lynch E, Mackay D. Structural trends and homelessness: a quantitative analysis. Edinburgh: Stationery Office; 2001.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Breen HM. Risk and protective factors associated with gambling consequences for indigenous Australians in North Queensland. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2012;10(2):258–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Orford J. Low income and vulnerability for gambling problems. Addiction. 2004;99(10):1356.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rintoul AC, Livingstone C, Mellor AP, Jolley D. Modelling vulnerability to gambling related harm: how disadvantage predicts gambling losses. Addict Res Theory. 2013;21(4):329–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Grun L, McKeigue P. Prevalence of excessive gambling before and after introduction of a national lottery in the United Kingdom: another example of the single distribution theory. Addiction. 2000;95(6):959–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Livingstone C. The social economy of poker machine gambling in Victoria. Int Gambl Stud. 2001;1;1(1):46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wardle H, Keily R, Astbury G, Reith G. ‘Risky places?’: Mapping gambling machine density and socio-economic deprivation. J Gambl Stud. 2014;30(1):201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Clotfelter CT, Cook PJ. Selling hope: state lotteries in America. Harvard University Press. 1991.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Slutske WS, Deutsch AR, Statham DJ, Martin NG. Local area disadvantage and gambling involvement and disorder: evidence for gene-environment correlation and interaction. J Abnorm Psychol. 2015;124(3):606–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Dyall L. Gambling, social disorganisation and deprivation. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2007;5(4):320–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Schissel B. Betting against youth: the effects of socioeconomic marginality on gambling among young people. Youth Soc. 2001;32(4):473–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    van der Maas M. Problem gambling, anxiety and poverty: an examination of the relationship between poor mental health and gambling problems across socio-economic status. Int Gambl Stud. 2016;16(2):281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Delton AW, Robertson TE. The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: a life history theory approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;100(6):1015–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Nyman JA, Dowd BE, Hakes JK, Winters KC, King S. Work and non-pathological gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2013;29(1):61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    • Lopes LL. Between hope and fear: the psychology of risk. In: Advances in experimental social psychology 1987 Jan 1 (Vol. 20, pp. 255–295). Academic Press. The article is important as it introduces the concept of the psychoeconomics of gambling in relation to homelessness. Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Cooter R, Ulen T. Law and economics. (6th ed.). Berkeley Law Books. Berkeley: Addison-Wesley; 2016.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    • Sharman S, D’Ardenne, J. Gambling and homelessness: developing an information sheet, screening tool and resource sheet. London: GambleAware, 2018. This study utilises a qualitative approach to understand the appeal of gambling within a homeless sample, and has developed a range of tools to assist homelessness practitioners in the identification and provision of support for homeless gamblers. Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    • Williams RJ, Volberg RA, Stevens RM. The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; 2012 May 8. This paper is important when considering prevalence of gambling problems in specific countries, and populations as it highlights some of the methodological flaws and difficulties faced by researchers. Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Holdsworth L, Tiyce M. Exploring the hidden nature of gambling problems among people who are homeless. Aust Soc Work. 2012;65(4):474–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of East LondonStratfordUK

Personalised recommendations