Current Addiction Reports

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 307–313 | Cite as

Fantasy Sports: Skill, Gambling, or Are These Irrelevant Issues?

  • Dylan PickeringEmail author
  • Alex Blaszczynski
  • Melanie Hartmann
  • Brittany Keen
Gambling (J Derevensky, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Gambling


The emergence of daily fantasy sports has generated significant debate as to whether it constitutes gambling. Under current US law, States variably determine the legality of daily fantasy sports on the basis of it being a skill-based competition (legal) or a form of gambling where chance plays a major role (illegal). Accordingly, inconsistent State legislations are partly accounted for by differences in the degree to which legislators believe the activity is a game of skill or luck. In the absence of clear guidelines differentiating the importance of skill and luck, operators have been free in some States to operate without regulatory consumer protection guidelines. Regardless of where it fits on the skill/chance continuum, the activity contains structural elements promoting excessive use exposing players to harm. Consequently, it is argued that endeavors to define daily fantasy sports as skill-based or gambling are misguided. The degree of harm caused by excessive daily fantasy sports should be established and in response, harm minimization legislation strategies implemented.


Gambling Problem gambling Fantasy sports Daily fantasy sports Regulation Law 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Fantasy Sports Trade Association. Industry demographics: at a glance [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Jan 6]. Available from:
  2. 2.
    Fantasy Sports Trade Association. Industry demographics | FSTA [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Dec 10]. Available from:
  3. 3.
    Fisher E. Fantasy players seen as big spenders in key consumer categories [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2016 Jan 6]. Available from:
  4. 4.
    Cooper A. Fantasy sports enjoy very real growth [Internet]. The Sydney Morning Herald. 2012 [cited 2016 Jan 6]. Available from:
  5. 5.’s standard scoring system [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Jan 6]. Available from:
  6. 6.
    DraftKings. Contest lobby - DraftKings [Internet]. DraftKings - Daily Fantasy Sports for Cash. 2015 [cited 2016 Jan 6]. Available from:
  7. 7.
    Grove C. Report: daily fantasy leader FanDuel looking to raise at billion-dollar valuation [Internet]. Legal Sports Report. 2015 [cited 2015 Dec 16]. Available from:
  8. 8.
    Kim E. Billion-dollar sports gambling startups Draft Kings and FanDuel are legal because of a questionable loophole in the law [Internet]. Business Insider Australia. 2015 [cited 2016 Jan 5]. Available from:
  9. 9.
    Boyd T. Moneyball is no longer a start-up fantasy [Internet]. Financial Review. 2015 [cited 2016 Jan 6]. Available from:
  10. 10.••
    Drayer J, Dwyer B, Shapiro SL. Examining the impact of league entry fees on online fantasy sport participation and league consumption. Eur Sport Manag Q. 2013;13:339–57. This study surveys a sample of FS users and groups them based on whether they did or did play fantasy baseball for money. The results indicated that those who played FS for money were more motivated by the social benefits of participation rather than the opportunity to win money. This finding contradicts research on traditional gambling form, which often reports social harms and stronger motivations toward money with increased gambling.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karg AJ, McDonald H. Fantasy sport participation as a complement to traditional sport consumption. Sport Manag Rev. 2011;14(4):327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee S, Seo WJ, Green BC. Understanding why people play fantasy sport: development of the Fantasy Sport Motivation Inventory (FanSMI). Eur Sport Manag Q. 2013;13(2):166–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruihley BJ, Hardin RL. Message boards and the fantasy sport experience. Int J Sport Commun. 2011;4(2):233–52.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Warschauer M. Of digital divides and social multipliers: combining language and technology for human development. Information and communication technologies in the teaching and learning of foreign languages: state of the art, needs and perspectives [Internet]. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education; 2004 [cited 2016 Jan 5] p. 46–52. Available from:
  15. 15.
    Davis NW, Duncan MC. Sports knowledge is power: reinforcing masculine privilege through fantasy sport league participation. J Sport Soc Issues. 2006;30(3):244–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palmer C. Sports betting research: Literature review [Internet]. University of Tasmania; 2014 [cited 2016 Dec 2]. Available from:
  17. 17.
    Ruihley BJ, Billings AC. Infiltrating the boys’ club: motivations for women’s fantasy sport participation. Int Rev Sociol Sport. 2013;48(4):435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Delfabbro PH, Winefield AH. Predictors of irrational thinking in regular slot machine gamblers. J Psychol. 2000;134(2):117–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee W-Y, Kwak DH, Lim C, Pedersen PM, Miloch KS. Effects of personality and gender on fantasy sports game participation: the moderating role of perceived knowledge. J Gambl Stud. 2011;27(3):427–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dwyer B, Kim Y. For love or money: developing and validating a motivational scale for fantasy football participation. J Sport Manag. 2011;25:70–83.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mills BM, Kwak DH, Lee JS, Lee W-Y. Competitive environments in fantasy sports gaming: effects of entry fees and rewards on opposition quality and league sorting. Int Gambl Stud. 2014;14(1):161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thompson WN. Why do people gamble? In: Legalized Gambling: A Reference Handbook. 2nd ed. 1997.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wildman RW. Gambling: an attempt at an integration. Wynne Resources; 1997.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Kwak DH, Lim CH, Lee WY, Mahan III J. How confident are you to win your fantasy league: exploring the antecedents and consequences of winning expectancy. J Sport Manag. 2010;24(4):416–33.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goodman JK, Irwin JR. Special random numbers: beyond the illusion of control [Internet]. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2006. [cited 2016 Jan 5], Available from:
  27. 27.
    Ladouceur R, Giroux I, Jacques C. Winning on the horses: how much strategy and knowledge are needed? J Psychol. 1998;132(2):133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rose IN. Owens MD. Mary Ann Liebert: Internet gaming law; 2005.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miller E, Singer D. For daily fantasy sports operators, the curse of too much skill [Internet]. Sports Business Daily Global Journal. 2015 [cited 2016 Jan 5]. Available from:
  30. 30.
    Rose IN. Are daily fantasy sports legal? Gaming Law Rev Econ. 2015;19(5):346–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    National Council on Problem Gambling. Resolution of the NCPG board of directors regarding fantasy sports [Internet]. 2015. Available from:
  32. 32.
    Productivity Commission. Gambling [Internet]. Canberra; 2010 [cited 2015 Dec 16]. Report No.: 50. Available from:
  33. 33.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Neal P, Delfabbro PH, O’Neill M. Problem gambling and harm: working towards a national definition [Internet]. Melbourne, Australia: National Ministerial Council on Gambling, South Australian Centre for Economic Studies, & the Department of Psychology, University of Adelaide; 2005. Available from:
  35. 35.••
    Marchica L, Derevensky J. Fantasy sports: a growing concern among college student-athletes. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2015;1–11. The study looks at data from 2004, 2008, 2012, national surveys of collegiate athletes assessing gambling behaviour. A steady rise in FS participation among college students was found between 2004–2012. Approximately 50% of male and 25% of female college athletes who qualified as at-risk or problem gamblers also reported FS wagering. Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Martin RJ, Nelson S. Fantasy sports, real money: exploration of the relationship between fantasy sports participation and gambling-related problems. Addict Behav. 2014;39(10):1377–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Martin RJ, Nelson SE, Gallucci AR. Game on: past year gambling, gambling-related problems, and fantasy sports gambling among college athletes and non-athletes. J Gambl Stud. 2015;1–13.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    FanDuel. The birth of daily fantasy, as we know it - about FanDuel [Internet]. FanDuel. 2015 [cited 2016 Jan 6]. Available from:
  39. 39.
    Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) [Internet]. 31 U.S.C 5361–5366 2006. Available from:
  40. 40.
    Edelman M. Navigating the legal risks of daily fantasy sports: a detailed primer in federal and state gambling law. Univ Ill Law Rev. 2015;Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cabot AN, Light GJ, Rutledge KF. Alex Rodriguez, a monkey, and the game of scrabble: the hazard of using illogic to define the legality of games of mixed skill and chance. Drake Law Rev. 2009;57:383–412.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    FanDuel. FanDuel: daily fantasy football, MLB, NBA, NHL leagues for cash [Internet]. FanDuel Terms of Use. 2015 [cited 2015 Dec 17]. Available from:
  43. 43.
    Grove C. Daily fantasy sports - bill tracker [Internet]. Legal Sports Report. 2016 [cited 2016 Jan 5]. Available from:
  44. 44.
    Moneyball FAQ. Daily fantasy sports for real money at Moneyball [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Dec 17]. Available from:
  45. 45.
    Rose IN. End game for daily fantasy sports? Gaming Law Rev Econ. 2015;19(9):634–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.••
    National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG). NCPG releases first fantasy sports consumer protection guidelines [Internet]. PRWeb. 2015 [cited 2015 Dec 17]. Available from: This document prepared by the National Council on Problem Gambling represents the first attempt to develop guidelines specifying the regulatory requirements to be implemented in Fantasy Sports contests involving entry fees and the award of cash prizes. The framework covers areas of staff training, informed decision-making, customer assistance, timeouts, self-exclusion, advertising and promotions, and website and game features.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dylan Pickering
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alex Blaszczynski
    • 1
  • Melanie Hartmann
    • 1
  • Brittany Keen
    • 1
  1. 1.Responsible Gambling Research Group, School of Psychology (MO2)The University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations