Social and Economic Impacts of Gambling
- 1.5k Downloads
Purpose of Review
This paper is a review of the recent academic literature on the socioeconomic impacts of gambling. The purpose is to provide a review of the most recent contributions to the growing literature regarding the economic and social impacts of gambling, with a focus on casinos. We divide our review into two sections: economic impacts and social impacts.
Better data availability across a wider set of jurisdictions has resulted in improved research quality in recent contributions to this literature.
The most recent literature in this area suggests that casinos often have at least a modestly positive economic impact on their host economies. It is more difficult to measure the social impacts, and the net social impacts of casinos remain unclear. The variety of conclusions from recent research suggests that the industry’s impacts vary with characteristics of the hosting state, country, or regional economy.
KeywordsSocial costs Economic impacts Casino gambling Employment Taxes Consumer benefits Crime Drunk driving Bankruptcy
Thanks to Elizabeth Mandell for research assistance.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Walker reports personal fees from Gambling Research Exchange Ontario, personal fees from Kansas Lottery Gaming Facilities Review Board, personal fees from Maryland State Lottery & Gaming Control Agency, personal fees from State of Florida Legislature, outside the submitted work. Dr. Sobel has nothing to disclose.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by either of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Goodman R. Legalized gambling: public policy and economic development issues. Econ Dev Rev. 1995;13:55–7.Google Scholar
- 3.Gazel RC, Thompson WN. Casino gamblers in Illinois: Who are they? Unpublished UNLV paper. 1996.Google Scholar
- 4.Goodman R. The luck business: the devastating consequences and broken promises of America’s gambling explosion. New York: The Free Press; 1995.Google Scholar
- 6.Kindt JW. The economic impacts of legalized gambling activities. Drake Law Rev. 1994;43:51–95.Google Scholar
- 9.Garrett TA. Casino gaming and local employment trends. Fed Reserve Bank St Louis Rev. 2004;86(1):9–22.Google Scholar
- 10.Cotti CD. The effect of casinos on local labor markets: a county level analysis. J Gambl Bus Econ. 2008;2(2):17–41.Google Scholar
- 11.••Humphreys BR, Marchand J. New casinos and local labor markets: evidence from Canada. Labour Econ. 2013;24:151–60. This study finds positive labor-market benefits from casinos, limited to the hospitality and entertainment industries, but that they are present for only about 5 years.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Economopoulos AJ. Examining the impact of casinos on economic development: a spatial analysis of the counties in the Mid-Atlantic region. J Gambl Bus Econ. 2014;8(2):77–92.Google Scholar
- 13.•Hicks MJ. Do good fences make good neighbors? The cross border impact of casino entrance. Growth Chang. 2014;45(1):5–20. This study examines county-level data in Indiana, from 1990 through 2008, and finds modest income growth in casino counties with insignificant impacts on neighboring counties.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Walker DM, Jackson JD. Casinos and economic growth: an update. J Gambl Bus Econ. 2013;7(2):80–7.Google Scholar
- 16.Walker DM, Jackson JD. New goods and economic growth: evidence from legalized gambling. Rev Reg Stud. 1998;28(2):47–69.Google Scholar
- 22.••Nichols MW, Tosun MS, Yang J. The fiscal impact of legalized casino gambling. Public Finance Rev. 2015;43:739–61. This study uses county-level data from 1987 through 2007 and finds that casinos do not have a significant impact on per capita government spending or revenues.Google Scholar
- 25.•Philander KS, Philander KS. A normative analysis of gambling tax policy. UNLV Gaming Res Rev J. 2013;17(2):17–26. This study suggests that fixed license-based taxes may be preferable to taxes based on gross gaming revenue, but if revenue-based taxes are employed they should be set in combination with taxes on other complementary industries.Google Scholar
- 27.Australian Productivity Commission. Australia’s Gambling Industries Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Productivity Commission, 1999.Google Scholar
- 29.Collins PC. Gambling and the public interest. Westport: Praeger; 2003.Google Scholar
- 31.Crane Y. New casinos in the United Kingdom: costs, benefits and other considerations [Ph.D. Dissertation]. Salford, U.K.: Salford Business School; 2006.Google Scholar
- 32.Grinols EL. Distance effects in consumption: measuring distance value with application to casino siting. Rev Reg Stud. 1999;29(1):63–76.Google Scholar
- 34.•Forrest D. An economic and social review of gambling in Great Britain. J Gambling Bus Econ. 2013;7(3):1–33. This article surveys the impacts of gambling in Great Britain and estimates that consumer benefits are substantially greater than the social costs of gambling.Google Scholar
- 36.•Gallagher RM. An examination of cannibalization effects within the riverboat gaming industry: the case of Illinois-area casinos. Growth Chang. 2014;45(1):41–59. This study finds that new riverboat casinos do indeed cannibalize business from existing riverboat casinos, but these impacts decline rapidly with distance.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Economopoulos AJ, Luxem U. Examining the impact of competition on casino revenues and prices in the Mid-Atlantic states. UNLV Gaming Res Rev J. 2015;19(1):1–15.Google Scholar
- 40.••Philander KS, Fiedler I. Online poker in North America: empirical evidence on its complementary effect on the offline gambling market. Gaming Law Rev Econ. 2012;16(7/8):415–23. This study finds that online poker gambling and land-based gambling are complementary; as casino revenue increases so does online poker revenue, and vice versa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Grinols EL. Gambling as economic policy: enumerating why losses exceed gains. Ill Bus Rev. 1995;52:6–12.Google Scholar
- 43.Task Force on Gambling Addiction in Maryland. Final report. Baltimore, MD: Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 1990.Google Scholar
- 45.National Research Council. Pathological Gambling. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.Google Scholar
- 46.Clement D. Gambling: A sure thing? Fedgazette. Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis; 2003.Google Scholar
- 47.Walker DM. Casinos and crime in the U.S.A. In: Benson BL, Zimmerman PR, editors. Handbook on the economics of crime. Northampton: Edward Elgar; 2010. p. 488–517.Google Scholar
- 49.Walker DM. Evaluating crime attributable to casinos in the U.S.: a closer look at Grinols and Mustard’s "Casinos, crime, and community costs". J Gambling Bus Econ. 2008;2(3):23–52.Google Scholar
- 52.•Johnson LT, Ratcliffe JH. A partial test of the impact of a casino on neighborhood crime. Secur J. 2014;Online First:1–17. This study uses neighborhood data for Philadelphia, and finds no significant impact of a new casino on violent street felonies, vehicle crime, drug crime, or residential burglary.Google Scholar
- 54.••Humphreys BR, Soebbing BP. Access to legal gambling and the incidence of crime: evidence from Alberta. Growth Chang. 2014;45(1):98–120. This study examines the link between crime and both legal casinos and VLTs, finding little significant results other than a slight increase in credit card fraud from VLTs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.••Cotti CD, Walker DM. The impact of casinos on fatal alcohol-related traffic accidents in the United States. J Health Econ. 2010;29(6):788–96. This study finds that casinos result in significant increases in drunk driving and fatal alcohol-related traffic accidents for rural counties but opposite in more populated areas.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.•Boardman B, Perry JJ. Access to gambling and declaring personal bankruptcy. J Soc Econ. 2007;36:789–801. This study finds that states that adopted lotteries and casinos prior to 1995 did experience significantly higher personal bankruptcy rates, but that the effect has disappeared since that time.CrossRefGoogle Scholar