Advertisement

Brazilian Journal of Botany

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 771–782 | Cite as

S-methylmethionine contributes to enhanced defense against Maize dwarf mosaic virus infection in maize

  • Edit Ludmerszki
  • Asztéria Almási
  • Ilona Rácz
  • Zoltán Szigeti
  • Ádám Solti
  • Csilla Oláh
  • Szabolcs RudnóyEmail author
Article

Abstract

The beneficial and protective effects of S-methylmethionine (SMM) were investigated in Maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV) infected maize (Zea mays L.). Response reactions and alterations in the physiological state of the plants were monitored by following changes in the values of chlorophyll a fluorescence and chlorophyll content, and differences in the expression patterns of the stress-related genes S-adenosylmethionine synthase (SAMS) and the 14-3-3-like protein gene G-box factor 14-6 (GF14-6). Infection was validated using the ELISA technique. A pronounced decrease in the red to far-red chlorophyll a fluorescence ratio, indicative of chlorophyll content, was observed in infected plants, which was tempered by SMM pretreatment. A noticeable decrease in the photochemical quenching of photosystem II and the thermal dissipation of the antennae was observed, together with a notable increase in other non-photochemical energy dissipation parameters in response to MDMV infection. SMM treatment enhanced blue fluorescence in both uninfected and MDMV-infected plants (probably due to the production of protective phenolic compounds), while infection characteristically increased green fluorescence emission. SMM treatment was found to elevate the rate of gene expressions of SAMS and GF14-6. The results suggest that SMM pretreatment enhances the stress response reactions that protect maize plants against MDMV infection.

Keywords

Biotic stress Chlorophyll a fluorescence Gene expression Quantitative real-time PCR Sweet corn 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Demeter Lásztity for all his help and advice, Györgyi Balogh for her technical assistance and Barbara Harasztos for revising the manuscript linguistically. This research was supported by the European Social Fund in the framework of TÁMOP 4.2.4. A/1-11-1-2012-0001 ‘National Excellence Program’, and by a grant from the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA 108834).

References

  1. Baker NR (2008) Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Ann Rev Plant Biol 59:89–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belkhodja R, Morales F, Quílez R, López-Millán AF, Abadía A, Abadía J (1998) Iron deficiency causes changes in chlorophyll fluorescence due to the reduction in the dark of the photosystem II acceptor side. Photosynth Res 56:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourgis F, Roje S, Nuccio ML, Fisher DB, Tarczynski MC, Li C, Herschbach C, Rennenberg H, Pimenta MJ, Shen TL, Gage DA, Hanson AD (1999) S-methylmethionine plays a major role in phloem sulfur transport and is synthesized by a novel type of methyltransferase. Plant Cell 11:1485–1497PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bürling K, Hunsche M, Noga G (2011) Use of blue–green and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements for differentiation between nitrogen deficiency and pathogen infection in winter wheat. J Plant Phys 168:1641–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buschmann C (2007) Variability and application of the chlorophyll fluorescence emission ratio red/far-red of leaves. Photosynth Res 92:261–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buschmann C, Lichtenthaler HK (1998) Principles and characteristics of multi-colour fluorescence imaging of plants. J Plant Physiol 152:297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buschmann C, Langsdorf G, Lichtenthaler HK (2000) Imaging of the blue, green, and red fluorescence emission of plants: an overview. Photosynthetica 38:483–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campo S, Peris-Peris C, Montesinos L, Peñas G, Messeguer J, Segundo BS (2012) Expression of the maize ZmGF 14-6 gene in rice confers tolerance to drought stress while enhancing susceptibility to pathogen infection. J Exp Bot 63:983–999PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chappelle EW, Wood FM, McMurtrey JE, Newcourt WW (1985) Laser-induced fluorescence of green plants. 3: LIF spectral signatures of five major plant types. Appl Optics 24:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen F, Li Q, Sun L, He Z (2006) The rice 14-3-3 gene family and its involvement in responses to biotic and abiotic stress. DNA Res 13:53–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen AS, Popovic RB, Zalik S (1979) Effects of polyamines on chlorophyll and protein content, photochemical activity, and chloroplast ultrastructure of barley leaf discs during senescence. Plant Physiol 64:717–720PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Denison FC, Paul AL, Zupanska AK, Ferl RJ (2011) 14-3-3 proteins in plant physiology. Semin Cell Dev Biol 22:720–727CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixon RA, Paiva NL (1995) Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 7:1085–1097PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilmore AM, Yamamoto HY (1991) Zeaxanthin formation and energy-dependent fluorescence quenching in pea chloroplasts under artificially mediated linear and cyclic electron transport. Plant Physiol 96:635–643PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammond J (1998) Serological relationships between the cylindrical inclusion proteins of Potyviruses. Phytopathol 88:965–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hendrickson L, Förster B, Pogson BJ, Chow WS (2005) A simple chlorophyll fluorescence parameter that correlates with the rate coefficient of photoinactivation of Photosystem II. Photosynth Res 84:43–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hideg É, Juhász M, Bornman JF, Asada K (2002) The distribution and possible origin of blue-green fluorescence in control and stressed barley leaves. Photochem Photobiol Sci 1:934–941CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hura T, Grzesiek S, Hura K, Thiemt E, Tokarz K, Wedzony M (2007) Physiological and biochemical tools useful in drought-tolerance detection in genotypes of winter triticale: accumulation of ferulic acid correlates with drought tolerance. Ann Bot 100:767–775PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Karpinski S, Gabrys H, Mateo A, Karpinska B, Mullineaux PM (2003) Light perception in plant disease defence signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:390–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ko SH, Eliot AC, Kirsch JF (2004) S-methylmethionine is both a substrate and an inactivator of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase. Arch Biochem Biophys 421:85–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kofalvi SA, Nassuth A (1995) Influence of Wheat streak mosaic virus infection on phenylpropanoid metabolism and the accumulation of phenolics and lignin in wheat. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 47:365–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Konagaya KI, Matsushita Y, Kasahara M, Nyunoya H (2004) Members of 14-3-3 protein isoforms interacting with the resistance gene product N and the elicitor of Tobacco mosaic virus. J Gen Plant Pathol 70:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kósa E, Szegő D, Horváth E, Rácz I, Szigeti Z, Lásztity D, Páldi E (2011) Effect of S-methylmethionine on the photosynthesis in maize at different chilling temperatures. Cent Eur J Biol 6:75–83Google Scholar
  24. Lang M, Stober F, Lichtenthaler HK (1991) Fluorescence emission spectra of plant leaves and plant constituents. Radiat Environ Biophys 30:333–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lichtenthaler HK, Schweiger J (1998) Cell wall bound ferulic acid, the major substance of the blue-green fluorescence emission of plants. J Plant Physiol 152:272–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lichtenthaler HK, Hak R, Rinderle U (1990) The chlorophyll fluorescence ratio F690/F730 in leaves of different chlorophyll content. Photosynth Res 25:295–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ludmerszki E, Rácz I, Sz Rudnóy (2014) S-methylmethionine alters gene expression of candidate genes in Maize dwarf mosaic virus infected and drought stressed maize plants. Acta Biol Szeged 58:1–5Google Scholar
  28. Manoli A, Sturaro A, Trevisan S, Quaggiotti S, Nonis A (2012) Evaluation of candidate reference genes for qPCR in maize. J Plant Physiol 169:807–815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Marathe R, Anandalakshmi R, Smith TH, Pruss GJ, Vance VB (2000) RNA viruses as inducers, suppressors and targets of post-transcriptional gene silencing. Plant Mol Biol 43:295–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mayhew DE, Ford RE (1974) Detection of ribonuclease-resistant RNA in chloroplasts of corn leaf tissue infected with Maize dwarf mosaic virus. Virology 57:503–509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyer S, Cartelat A, Moya I, Cerovic ZG (2003) UV-induced blue-green and far-red fluorescence along wheat leaves: a potential signature of leaf ageing. J Exp Bot 54:757–769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Morales F, Cerovic ZG, Moya I (1996) Time-resolved blue-green fluorescence of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) leaves. Spectroscopic evidence for the presence of ferulic acid as the main fluorophore of the epidermis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1273:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mudd SH, Datko AH (1990) The S-methylmethionine cycle in Lemna paucicostata. Plant Physiol 93:623–630PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Niggeweg R, Michael AJ, Martin C (2004) Engineering plants with increased levels of the antioxidant chlorogenic acid. Nat Biotechnol 22:746–754CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Páldi K, Rácz I, Szigeti Z, Rudnóy S (2014) S-methylmethionine alleviates the cold stress by protection of the photosynthetic apparatus and stimulation of the phenylpropanoid pathway. Biol Plant 58:189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peleman J, Saito K, Cottyn B, Engler G, Seurinck J, Montagu MV, Inzé D (1989) Structure and expression analyses of the S-adenosylmethionine synthetase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 84:359–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pérez-Bueno ML, Ciscato M, vandeVen M, García-Luque I, Valcke R, Barón M (2006) Imaging viral infection: studies on Nicotiana benthamiana plants infected with the pepper mild mottle tobamovirus. Photosynth Res 90:111–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e45PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pfündel E (1998) Estimating the contribution of photosystem I to total leaf chlorophyll fluorescence. Photosynth Res 56:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Piñeda M, Gáspár L, Morales F, Szigeti Z, Barón M (2008) Multicolor fluorescence imaging of leaves—a useful tool for visualizing systemic viral infections in plants. Photochem Photobiol 84:1048–1060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pradeep K, Satya VK, Selvapriya M, Vijayasamundeeswari A, Ladhalakshmi D, Paranidharan V, Rabindran R, Samiyappan R, Balasubramanian P (2012) Engineering resistance against Tobacco streak virus (TSV) in sunflower and tobacco using RNA interference. Biol Plant 56:735–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rácz I, Páldi E, Szalai G, Janda T, Pál M, Lásztity D (2008) S-methylmethionine reduces cell membrane damage in higher plants exposed to low-temperature stress. J Plant Physiol 165:1483–1490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ranocha P, McNeil SD, Ziemak MJ, Li C, Tarczynski MC, Hanson AD (2001) The S-methylmethionine cycle in angiosperms: ubiquity, antiquity and activity. Plant J 25:575–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruban AV, Horton P (1995) Regulation of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 22:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Solti Á, Gáspár L, Vági P, Záray G, Fodor F, Sárvári É (2011) Cd, Fe and light sensitivity: interrelationships in Cd treated Populus. OMICS J Integr Biol 15:811–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Solti Á, Lenk S, Mihailova G, Mayer P, Barócsi A, Georgieva K (2014) Effects of habitat light conditions on the excitation quenching pathways in desiccating Haberlea rhodopensis leaves: an Intelligent FluoroSensor study. J Photochem Photobiol B 130:217–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Stewart LR, Bouchard R, Redinbaugh MG, Meulia T (2012) Complete sequence and development of a full-length infectious clone of an Ohio isolate of Maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV). Virus Res 165:219–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Stober F, Lang M, Lichtenthaler HK (1994) Blue, green, and red fluorescence emission signatures of green, etiolated, and white leaves. Remote Sens Environ 47:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Szalma SJ, Buckler ES IV, Snook ME, McMullen MD (2005) Association analysis of candidate genes for maysin and chlorogenic acid accumulation in maize silks. Theor Appl Genet 110:1324–1333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Szigeti Z (2008) Physiological status of cultivated plants characterised by multi-wavelength fluorescence imaging. Acta Agron Hung 56:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tóbiás I, Bakardjieva N, Palkovics L (2007) Comparison of Hungarian and Bulgarian isolates of maize dwarf mosaic virus. Cereal Res Commun 35:1643–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Urcuqui-Inchima S, Haenni A-L, Bernardi F (2001) Potyvirus proteins: a wealth of functions. Virus Res 74:157–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Uzarowska A, Dionisio G, Sarholz B, Piepho HP, Xu M, Ingvardsen CR, Wenzel G, Lübberstedt T (2009) Validation of candidate genes putatively associated with resistance to SCMV and MDMV in maize (Zea mays L.) by expression profiling. BMC Plant Biol 9:15PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3:research0034.1–research0034.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wei T, Huang TS, McNeil JF, Laliberté JF, Hong J, Nelson RS, Wang A (2010) Sequential recruitment of the endoplasmic reticulum and chloroplasts for plant potyvirus replication. J Virol 84:799–809PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams MM, Pataky JK (2012) Interactions between maize dwarf mosaic and weed interference on sweet corn. Field Crop Res 128:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang C, Song Y, Jiang F, Li G, Jiang Y, Zhu C, Wen F (2012) Virus resistance obtained in transgenic tobacco and rice by RNA interference using promoters with distinct activity. Biol Plant 56:742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Botanical Society of Sao Paulo 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edit Ludmerszki
    • 1
  • Asztéria Almási
    • 2
  • Ilona Rácz
    • 1
  • Zoltán Szigeti
    • 1
  • Ádám Solti
    • 1
  • Csilla Oláh
    • 1
  • Szabolcs Rudnóy
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant BiologyEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural ResearchHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations