Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of abstract of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric dentistry journals

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To systematically evaluate the reporting quality of the abstract of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric dentistry journals.

Materials and methods

Systematic reviews with meta-analyses in paediatric dentistry were searched in PubMed and Scopus databases from inception to December 2017. Selection of studies by title and abstract screening followed by full-text assessment was independently done by two reviewers. The quality of abstracts was assessed by PRISMA-Abstract checklist comprising of 12 items; one each for title and objective, three items for methods, three items for results, two items for discussion and two items for others. PRISMA-A median scores were calculated and compared with the article characteristics. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and multi-variate analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis test.

Results

A total of 24 studies were included in the analysis. The mean PRISMA-Abstract score was 7.46 ± 1.19. None of the studies were of high quality (score 10–12), 20 were of moderate (score 7–9), and 4 were of low quality (score 1–6). Journals that adhered to PRISMA guidelines showed significantly higher quality (p < 0.05). No association was found between the quality and the number of authors, country, journals, year of publication, word count and focus of study.

Conclusion

Majority of abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric dentistry journals were of moderate quality. Adoption and adherence to PRISMA-Abstract checklist by the journal editors and authors will enhance the reporting quality of abstracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asgary S, Shirvani A, Fazlyab M. MTA and ferric sulfate in pulpotomy outcomes of primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;39:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Altman DG, Hopewell S, Bastian H, Chalmers I, Gøtzsche PC, Lasserson T, Tovey D. PRISMA for Abstracts Group. PRISMA for abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001419.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bigna JJ, Um LN, Nansseu JR. A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2016;5:174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Borrelli B, Tooley EM, Scott-Sheldon LA. Motivational interviewing for parent-child health interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37:254–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botton G, Morgental CS, Scherer MM, Lenzi TL, Montagner AF, Rocha RD. Are self-etch adhesive systems effective in the retention of occlusal sealants? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26:402–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cianetti S, Lombardo G, Lupatelli E, Pagano S, Abraha I, Montedori A, Caruso S, Gatto R, De Giorgio S, Salvato R, Cianetti S. Dental fear/anxiety among children and adolescents. A systematic review. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017;18:121–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coll JA, Seale NS, Vargas K, Marghalani AA, Al Shamali S, Graham L. Primary tooth vital pulp therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39:16–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corica A, Caprioglio A. Meta-analysis of the prevalence of tooth wear in primary dentition. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014;15:385–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva SN, Gimenez T, Souza RC, Mello-Moura AC, Raggio DP, Morimoto S, Lara JS, Soares GC, Tedesco TK. Oral health status of children and young adults with autism spectrum disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27:388–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Bitetti MS, Ferreras JA. Publish (in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications. Ambio. 2017;46:121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eichenberger M, Erb J, Zwahlen M, Schätzle M. The timing of extraction of non-restorable first permanent molars: a systematic review Introduction. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015;16:272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faggion CM, Huda F, Wasiak J. Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontal. 2014a;41:625–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faggion CM, Liu J, Huda F, Atieh M. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry. J Periodontal Res. 2014b;49:137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming PS, Seehra J, Polychronopoulou A, Fedorowicz Z, Pandis N. Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm? Eur J Orthod. 2012;35:244–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fumes AC, Longo DL, De Rossi A, Fidalgo TK, de Paula e Silva FW, Borsatto MC, Küchler EC. Microleakage of sealants after phosphoric acid, Er: YAG laser and air abrasion enamel conditioning: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41:167–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Google Scholar Metrics (2018) https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&view_op=search_venues&vq=pediatric+dentistry&btnG. Accessed 21 Jun 2018.

  • Hartley J. Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2000;88:332.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:69–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman J, Nagendrababu V, Pullikotil SJ, Innes NPT. Critical appraisal of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals. Int J Paed Dent. 2018;28:548–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazerani M, Davoudian A, Zayeri F, Soori H. Assessing abstracts of Iranian systematic reviews and metaanalysis indexed in WOS and Scopus using PRISMA. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriyama A, Takahashi N, Nakayama T. Reporting of critical care trial abstracts: a comparison before and after the announcement of CONSORT guideline for abstracts. Trials. 2017;18:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzi TL, Gimenez T, Tedesco TK, Mendes FM, Rocha RD, Raggio DP. Adhesive systems for restoring primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26:364–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Tanner A. Effect of antimicrobial interventions on the oral microbiota associated with early childhood caries. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37:226–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li JL, Ge L, Ma JC, Zeng QL, Yao L, An N, Ding JX, Gan YH, Tian JH. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals. Sys Rev. 2014;3:58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin HK, Fang CE, Huang MS, Cheng HC, Huang TW, Chang HT, Tam KW. Effect of maternal use of chewing gums containing xylitol on transmission of mutans streptococci in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26:35–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marghalani AA, Guinto E, Phan M, Dhar V, Tinanoff N. Effectiveness of xylitol in reducing dental caries in children. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39:103–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martens L, De Smet S, Yusof MY, Rajasekharan S. Association between overweight/obesity and periodontal disease in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2017;18:69–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;21:6:e1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendrababu V, Pulikkotil SJ, Sultan OS, Jayaraman J, Peters OA. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in endodontics. J Endod. 2018;44:903–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoloso GF, Potter IG, Rocha RD, Montagner F, Casagrande L. A comparative evaluation of endodontic treatments for immature necrotic permanent teeth based on clinical and radiographic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27:217–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oomens MA, Lazzari S, Heymans MW, Forouzanfar T. Association between funding, risk of bias, and outcome of randomised controlled trials in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54:46–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pozos-Guillen A, Garcia-Flores A, Esparza-Villalpando V, Garrocho-Rangel A. Intracanal irrigants for pulpectomy in primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26:412–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raggio DP, Hesse D, Lenzi TL, Guglielmi ABC, Braga MM. Is Atraumatic restorative treatment an option for restoring occlusoproximal caries lesions in primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013;23:435–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos AP, Moreira IK, Scarpelli AC, Pordeus IA, Paiva SM, Martins CC. Survival of adhesive restorations for primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:370–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tedesco TK, Bonifácio CC, Calvo AF, Gimenez T, Braga MM, Raggio DP. Caries lesion prevention and arrestment in approximal surfaces in contact with glass ionomer cement restorations—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26:161–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tedesco TK, Calvo AF, Lenzi TL, et al. Art is an alternative for restoring occlusoproximal cavities in primary teeth—evidence from an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27:201–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Themessl-Huber MA, Freeman R, Humphris G, Macgillivray S, Terzi N. Empirical evidence of the relationship between parental and child dental fear: a structured review and meta-analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010;20:83–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tian J, Zhang J, Ge L, Yang K, Song F. The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;85:50–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsou AY, Treadwell JR. Quality and clarity in systematic review abstracts: an empirical study. Res Synth Methods. 2016;7:447–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JT, Tampi MP, Graham L, Estrich C, Crall JJ, Fontana M, Gillette EJ, Novy BB, Dhar V, Donly K, Hewlett ER. Sealants for preventing and arresting pit-and-fissure occlusal caries in primary and permanent molars. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:282–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements versus resin-based materials as fissure sealants: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010;11:18–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S. Caries-preventive effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) versus composite resin: a quantitative systematic review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011;12:5–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Clinical Dentistry, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    S. J. Pulikkotil & V. Nagendrababu

  2. Children’s Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    J. Jayaraman

Authors
  1. S. J. Pulikkotil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Jayaraman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Nagendrababu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Jayaraman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants and hence informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 22 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pulikkotil, S.J., Jayaraman, J. & Nagendrababu, V. Quality of abstract of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric dentistry journals. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 20, 383–391 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00432-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00432-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation