Abstract
Aim
To assess whether several try-in attempts change the circumference of preformed metal crowns (PMCs).
Methods
This in vitro, experimental study was performed on 68 PMCs of maxillary and mandibular molars that required crimping. First, a photograph was obtained of the gingival margin of each crown using a digital camera (fixed at a specific distance). Crown margins were then crimped using 114 pliers. The second photograph was obtained under the same conditions as the first one. After crimping, the crowns were removed using an excavator to assess the amount of crimping. This was repeated for the second time and a photograph was obtained after each time of PMC removal. The crown was crimped again and tried on the tooth and a photograph was obtained after completion of each phase. Photographs were saved in a computer and the circumference of the crowns was calculated using AutoCAD software.
Results
The reduction in circumference of the crowns following the first crimping was greater for the primary second molars than for the primary first molars and was on average 0.87%. After trying the crowns on teeth, the circumference of the crowns increased on average by 0.33%. This increase was 0.53% after trying the crowns for the second time. The reduction in circumference after the second crimping was 0.51%. There was an increase in circumference after re-trying of 0.35%. Changes in circumference of the crowns after the first (p = 0.037) and second (p = 0.00) try-in attempts were statistically significant.
Conclusions
Re-crimping is necessary after trying the crown on tooth and prior to cementation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afshar H, Mozafari Kojidi M. Evaluation of marginal circumference and marginal thickness changes in precrimped stainless steel crowns, after recrimping. Journal of Dental Medicine. 2006;19(2):57–62.
Afshar H, Ghandehari M, Soleimani B. Comparison of Marginal Circumference of Two Different Pre-Crimped Stainless Steel Crowns for Primary Molars After Re-Crimping. J Dent (Tehran). 2015;12(12):926–31.
AlShaibah WMB, El-Shehaby FA, El-Dokky NA, Ala’a RR. Comparative study on the microbial adhesion to preveneered and stainless steel crowns. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012;30(3):206–11.
Croll TP, Killian CM. Zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy and stainless steel crown restoration of a primary molar. Quintessence Int. 1992;23(6):383–8.
Croll TP, Epstein DW, Castaldi CR. Marginal adaptation of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(3):249–52.
Dawson LR, Simon JF Jr, Taylor PP. Use of amalgam and stainless steel restorations for primary molars. ASDC J Dent Child. 1981;48(6):420–2.
Full CA, Walker JD, Pinkham JR. Stainless steel crowns for deciduous molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;89(2):360–4.
Henderson HZ. Evaluation of the preformed stainless steel crown. ASDC J Dent Child. 1973;40(5):353–8.
Kowolik J, Kozlowski D, Jones JE. Utilization of stainless steel crowns by general dentists and pediatric dental specialists in Indiana. J Indiana Dent Assoc. 2007;86(2):16–21.
Kramer N, Frankenberger R. Compomers in restorative therapy of children: a literature review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17(1):2–9.
Martens LC, Dermaut LR. The marginal polishing of Ion Ni-Chro crowns: a preliminary report. ASDC J Dent Child. 1983;50(6):417–21.
Mathewson RJ, Primosch RE, Robertson D. Fundamentals of pediatric dentistry. Quintessence; 1995.
McDonald RE, Avery DR. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 7th ed. Mosby; 1999.
Pinkham J. Pediatric Dentistry-Infancy through Adolescence, Elseveir, a division of Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd; 2005.
Pour FF, Ghafournia M. A review of the efficacy of stainless steel crowns in the restoration of primary molars. Journal of Isfahan Dental School. 2012;8(2).
Rapp R. A simplified yet precise technic for the placement of stainless steel crowns on primary teeth. J Dent Child. 1966;33(2):101–9.
Soxman JA. Stainless steel crown and pulpotomy: procedure and technique for primary molars. Gen Dent. 2000;48(3):294–7.
Stewart RE. Pediatric dentistry: Scientific foundations and clinical practice. CV Mosby Company; 1982.
Acknowledgements
No funding has been received for the conduct of this study and /or preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest to declare.
Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals
This Study was approved in the ethic committee of our university (Code: 6166).
Informed consent
Parent signed informed consent forms.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heidari, A., Shahrabi, M., Shahrabi, M.S. et al. Effect of several try-in attempts of crimped preformed metal crowns on their circumference. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 20, 369–375 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0401-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-018-0401-5