Abstract
Aim
The aim of this national survey was to record the use of nitrous oxide and the perceptions of French dental practitioners to this form of sedation. The use of nitrous oxide sedation (NOS) has been authorised in private dental practice in France since December 2009 but, to date, no study implementing both quantitative and qualitative methods has explored such use.
Methods
The data were collected using a Google Forms questionnaire. A mixed methodology was used for data analysis: a quantitative approach to explore the use of conscious sedation and a qualitative thematic approach (using Nvivo software) to determine the practitioner’s perception of it.
Results
Responses were collected from 225 practitioners (19% of the target population of 1185). Most of the responders were trained in NOS use in private dental clinics. Seventy-three percent of those who trained privately actually used NOS, compared to 53% of those trained at university (p-value = 0.0052). Above all, NOS was used for children requiring restorative dentistry. The average price of the sedation was 50 Euros and it lasted, on average, for 37 min. The qualitative and thematic analysis revealed the financial and technical difficulties of implementing NOS in private practice. However, it also showed the benefits and pleasure associated with NOS use.
Conclusion
This statistical survey of French dental practitioners offers an insight of the current state of the use of conscious sedation with nitrous oxide in private general dental practice in France. It also includes the first report of dental practitioners’ perceptions of NOS use and may lead to a better understanding of the reasons why sedation is sometimes not used in private practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annequin D, Carbajal R, Chauvin P, et al. Fixed 50% nitrous oxide oxygen mixture for painful procedures: a French survey. Pediatrics. 2000;105:e47.
Bham F, Perrie H, Scribante J, Lee C-A. Paediatric dental chair sedation: an audit of current practice in Gauteng, South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2015;105:461–4.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
Daher A, Hanna RPL, Costa LR, Leles CR. Practices and opinions on nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation from dentists licensed to perform relative analgesia in Brazil. BMC Oral Health. 2012;12:21. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-12-21.
Dock M, Creedon RL. Pharmacologic management of patient behavior. In: Dean JA, Avery DR, McDonald RE, editors. McDonald and Avery’s dentistry for the child and adolescent. 9th ed. Maryland Heights, Mo: Mosby-Elservier; 2011. p. 261–4.
Griffiths M. Hypnosis for dental anxiety. Dent Update. 2014;41(78–80):83.
Huynh J, Donnelly LR, Brondani MA. Exploring dental student participation in interdisciplinary care team conferences in long-term care. Gerodontology. 2017;34(2):249–56. doi:10.1111/ger.12259 [Epub 2017 Feb 7].
Walley S, Albadri S. Undergraduates’ perceptions of the value of practical inhalation sedation experience in a UK dental school. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16:371–6.
Wilson S. A survey of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry membership: nitrous oxide and sedation. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18:287–93.
Wilson S, Houpt M. Project USAP 2010: use of sedative agents in pediatric dentistry—a 25-year follow-up survey. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38:127–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding
This study receive no funding.
Ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
All participants gave their consent for this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vilanova-Saingery, C., Bailleul-Forestier, I., Vaysse, F. et al. Use and perception of nitrous oxide sedation by French dentists in private practice: a national survey. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 18, 385–391 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-017-0307-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-017-0307-7