Abstract
Purpose
Radiation safety is one of the main concerns for thyroid cancer patients and their caregivers in radioiodine therapy. Even though there is a plethora of research describing radiation exposure to family members of patients, no meta-analysis study has been carried out on this subject. In this study, the doses received by the family members of the patients treated with 131I were investigated.
Methods
A systematic literature search was carried out using databases of Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar without the beginning date restriction until December 2022. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model, and the doses received by caregivers were calculated as the effect sizes.
Results
This meta-analysis retrieved a total number of 2080 family members of thyroid cancer patients. The pooled estimates for radiation exposure to family members of inpatients and outpatients treated with 131I were calculated as 0.4 mSv (95% CI 0.26–0.55 mSv) and 0.54 mSv (95% CI 0.48–0.60 mSv), respectively. The shapes of Begg’s funnel plots seemed asymmetrical for both groups of studies evaluating the doses received by the family members of inpatients and outpatients (Begg’s test p = 0.011 and < 0.001, respectively) which demonstrate the existence of publication bias in the results of included studies. The level of significance calculated in meta-regression analysis to evaluate the effects of administered activity, male sex ratio, and study quality score on the doses received by the family members of the inpatients treated with 131I were p = 0.526, 0.759, and 0.129 respectively. The p-values obtained to evaluate the effects of administered activity, age average of the caregivers, male sex ratio, and study quality score on the doses received by the family members of the outpatients treated with 131I were p = 0.496, 0.974, 0.010, and 0.636 respectively. The study location significantly modifies doses received by family members of patients (both p < 0.001).
Conclusion
There are considerable radiation protection considerations for the family members of patients after radioiodine administration. The results of this study showed that caregivers received doses of less than 1 mSv. There are no radiation hazards for family members of patients treated with 131I and the conventional advice provided by the radiation protection advisor is enough. The socioeconomic factors, lifestyle, and literacy levels of the patients’ family members determined the compliance of the caregivers with safety recommendations and therefore modifies the doses received by family members.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the article.
Change history
13 June 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-023-00571-7
Abbreviations
- 131I:
-
Radioactive iodine
- mSv:
-
Millisievert
- GBq:
-
Gigabecquerel
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
References
Kheruka SC, Shankar N, Ora M et al (2021) Do current radiation safety guidelines allow the safe release of a thyroid cancer patient after high-dose radioiodine therapy? An Indian perspective. Indian J Nucl Med 36(2):148–152
Kadhim AA, Sheikhzadeh P, Farzanefar S et al (2020) Radiation dose assessment to family members taking care of non-cancerous thyroid patients treated with i-131 therapy in nuclear medicine department. Radiat Prot Dosim 190(2):208–216
Al-Maskery I, Bererhi H (2009) Radiation exposure levels in family members of Omani patients with thyrotoxicosis treated with radioiodine (131I) as outpatients. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 9(2):148–152
Cappelen T, Unhjem JF, Amundsen AL et al (2006) Radiation exposure to family members of patients with thyrotoxicosis treated with iodine-131. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:81–86
Ebrahimi M, Changizi V, Kardan MR et al (2016) Experimental and analytical dose assessment of patient’s family members treated with I-131. Int J Med Health Sci 10(9):448–452
Ebrahimi M, Kardan MR, Changizi V et al (2018) Prediction of dose to the relatives of patients treated with radioiodine-131 using neural networks. J Radiol Prot 38(1):422–433
Barrington SF, O’Doherty MJ, Kettle AG et al (1999) Radiation exposure of the families of outpatients treated with radioiodine (iodine-131) for hyperthyroidism. Eur J Nucl Med 26:686–692
Salman K, Wagih S (2018) Measurement of external radiation exposure to household contacts of outpatients treated with radioactive iodine (131I). Egyptian J Nucl Med 16(16):70–84
Nantajit D, Saengsuda S, NaNakorn P et al (2015) High-dose radioiodine outpatient treatment: an initial experience in Thailand. Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol 3(1):66–71
Jeong KH, Jung JW, Kim CB et al (2014) Estimation of external radiation dose to caregivers of patients treated with radioiodine after thyroidectomy. Health Phys 106(4):466–474
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1997) Release of patients administered radioactive materials. US Government Printing Office, Washington
Tonnonchiang SSN, Chaudakshetrin P, Tuntawiroon M (2016) Radiation exposure to relatives of patients treated with iodine-131 for thyroid cancer at Siriraj hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 99(2):220–224
Vetter RJ (2008) ICRP Publication 103, The recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. LWW.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) (2006) Management of radionuclide therapy patients. NCRP Report No.155. Bethesda
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2002) Radiological protection for medical exposure to ionizing radiation, International Atomic Energy Agency Safety Guide No. RS-G-1.5. Vienna
European Commission (1998) Radiation Protection 97: Radiation Protection Following Iodine-131 Therapy (exposures Due to Outpatients Or Discharged Inpatients): European Communities. European Commission, Luxembourg
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):1–34
Lee HK, Hong SJ, Jeong KH et al (2015) An engagement factor for caregiver radiation dose assessment with radioiodine treatment. Radiat Prot Dosim 163(4):499–508
Mathieu I, Caussin J (1997) Doses in family members after 131I treatment. Lancet 350(9084):1074–1075
de Carvalho JWdA, Sapienza M, Ono C et al (2009) Could the treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma with 3.7 and 5.55 GBq of (131I) NaI, on an outpatient basis, be safe? Nucl Med Commun. 30(7):533–541
Harbert JC, Wells SN (1974) Radiation exposure to the family of radioactive patients. J Nucl Med 15(10):887–888
Jacobson A, Plato P, Toeroek D (1978) Contamination of the home environment by patients treated with Iodine-131: initial results. Am J Public Health 68(3):225–230
Pant GS, Sharma S, Bal C et al (2006) Radiation dose to family members of hyperthyroidism and thyroid cancer patients treated with 131I. Radiat Prot Dosim 118(1):22–27
Salman K, Wagih S, Munshi T et al (2018) Measurement of radiation exposure to household contacts of patients with graves’ disease treated with low dose radioactive iodine (131I) on outpatient basis. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 49(4):1125–1130
Salman K, Wagih S, Munshi T et al (2017) A study of the factors predicting radiation exposure to contacts of Saudi patients treated with low dose radioactive iodine (I-131). Eur J Cancer 1(72):S135
Willegaignon J, Sapienza M, Ono C et al (2011) Outpatient radioiodine therapy for thyroid cancer: a safe nuclear medicine procedure. Clin Nucl Med 36(6):440–445
North DL, Shearer DR, Hennessey JV et al (2001) Effective half-life of 131I in thyroid cancer patients. Health Phys 81(3):325–329
Willegaignon J, Malvestiti LF, Guimaraes MI et al (2006) 131I effective half-life (Teff) for patients with thyroid cancer. Health Phys 91(2):119–122
Meftah S, Kraiem T (2021) A thermoluminescent method for the evaluation of the 131I effective half-life in the thyroid when treating Graves’ disease. Radiat Environ Biophys 60(2):289–298
Berg GE, Michanek AM, Holmberg EC et al (1996) Iodine-131 treatment of hyperthyroidism: significance of effective half-life measurements. J Nucl Med 37(2):228–232
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the research affair of the Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center and Ilam University of Medical Sciences.
Funding
This study was funded by Ilam University of Medical Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AIA: content planning, literature search and review, data collection, and manuscript editing. KNK: literature search and review, data collection, and manuscript editing. RTA: literature search and review, data collection, and manuscript editing. SSZ: project development, content planning, literature search and review, data collection, manuscript writing and editing, and meta-analysis. NN: literature search and review, data collection, and manuscript editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the local Medical Ethical Committee.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: Correction to affiliations 4 and 5.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Abdi, A.I., Khorshed, K.N., Ali, R.T. et al. Radiation exposure to family members of patients treated with radioactive iodine (131I): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transl Imaging 11, 465–477 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-023-00561-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-023-00561-9