Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Assessment of ecological quality in Northwest China (2000–2020) using the Google Earth Engine platform: Climate factors and land use/land cover contribute to ecological quality
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Research Article
  • Open Access
  • Published: 02 November 2022

Assessment of ecological quality in Northwest China (2000–2020) using the Google Earth Engine platform: Climate factors and land use/land cover contribute to ecological quality

  • Jinjie Wang1,2,3,
  • Jianli Ding1,2,3,
  • Xiangyu Ge1,2,3,
  • Shaofeng Qin1,2,3 &
  • …
  • Zhe Zhang1,2,3 

Journal of Arid Land volume 14, pages 1196–1211 (2022)Cite this article

  • 245 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The ecological quality of inland areas is an important aspect of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). The ecological environment of Northwest China is vulnerable to changes in climate and land use/land cover, and the changes in ecological quality in this arid region over the last two decades are not well understood. This makes it more difficult to advance the UN SDGs and develop appropriate measures at the regional level. In this study, we used the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) products to generate remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform to examine the relationship between ecological quality and environment in Xinjiang during the last two decades (from 2000 to 2020). We analyzed a 21-year time series of the trends and spatial characteristics of ecological quality. We further assessed the importance of different environmental factors affecting ecological quality through the random forest algorithm using data from statistical yearbooks and land use products. Our results show that the RSEI constructed using the GEE platform can accurately reflect the ecological quality information in Xinjiang because the contribution of the first principal component was higher than 90.00%. The ecological quality in Xinjiang has increased significantly over the last two decades, with the northern part of this region having a better ecological quality than the southern part. The areas with slightly improved ecological quality accounted for 31.26% of the total land area of Xinjiang, whereas only 3.55% of the land area was classified as having a slightly worsen (3.16%) or worsen (0.39%) ecological quality. The vast majority of the deterioration in ecological quality mainly occurred in the barren areas Temperature, precipitation, closed shrublands, grasslands and savannas were the top five environmental factors affecting the changes in RSEI. Environmental factors were allocated different weights for different RSEI categories. In general, the recovery of ecological quality in Xinjiang has been controlled by climate and land use/land cover during the last two decades and policy-driven ecological restoration is therefore crucial. Rapid monitoring of inland ecological quality using the GEE platform is projected to aid in the advancement of the comprehensive assessment of the UN SDGs.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Bian J, Li A, Lei G, et al. 2020. Global high-resolution mountain green cover index mapping based on Landsat images and Google Earth Engine. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 162: 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boori M S, Choudhary K, Paringer R, et al. 2021. Spatiotemporal ecological vulnerability analysis with statistical correlation based on satellite remote sensing in Samara, Russia. Journal of Environmental Management, 285: 112138, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford J B, Schlaepfer D R, Lauenroth W K, et al. 2020. Robust ecological drought projections for drylands in the 21st century. Global Change Biology, 26(7): 3906–3919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan B A, Gao L, Ye Y, et al. 2018. China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature, 559(7713): 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Park T, Wang X, et al. 2019. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nature Sustainability, 2: 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W J, Lu Y Q, Liu G L. 2021. Balancing cropland gain and desert vegetation loss: The key to rural revitalization in Xinjiang, China. Growth and Change, 53(3): 1122–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng L, Yan W, Zhang Y, et al. 2016. Severe depletion of soil moisture following land-use changes for ecological restoration: Evidence from northern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 366: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng Y, Jiang W, Wu Z, et al. 2022. Assessing surface water losses and gains under rapid urbanization for SDG 6.6.1 using long-term Landsat imagery in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China. Remote Sensing, 14(4): 881, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng L, Chi B J, Dong H Z. 2022. Cotton cultivation technology with Chinese characteristics has driven the 70-year development of cotton production in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 21(3): 597–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng X, Fu B, Piao S, et al. 2016. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nature Climate Change, 6: 1019–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gang C, Gao X, Peng S, et al. 2019. Satellite observations of the recovery of forests and grasslands in Western China. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 124(7): 1905–1922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao W, Zhang S, Rao X, et al. 2021. Landsat TM/OLI-based ecological and environmental quality survey of Yellow River Basin, Inner Mongolia Section. Remote Sensing, 13(21): 4477, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge X, Ding J, Jin X, et al. 2021. Estimating agricultural soil moisture content through UAV-based hyperspectral images in the arid region. Remote Sensing, 13(8): 1562, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13081562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge X, Ding J, Teng D, et al. 2022a. Exploring the capability of Gaofen-5 hyperspectral data for assessing soil salinity risks. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 112: 102969, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge X, Ding J, Teng D, et al. 2022b. Updated soil salinity with fine spatial resolution and high accuracy: The synergy of Sentinel-2 MSI, environmental covariates and hybrid machine learning approaches. CATENA, 212: 106054, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Y, Abuduwaili J, Ma L, et al. 2016. Potential transport pathways of dust emanating from the playa of Ebinur Lake, Xinjiang, in arid northwest China. Atmospheric Research, 178–179: 196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, et al. 2017. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202: 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan J, Yao J, Li M, et al. 2021. Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of anthropogenic impacts on remotely sensed vegetation dynamics in Xinjiang, China. Remote Sensing, 13(22): 4651, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo B, Zang W, Yang F, et al. 2020. Spatial and temporal change patterns of net primary productivity and its response to climate change in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China from 2000 to 2015. Journal of Arid Land, 12(1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo B, Wei C, Yu Y, et al. 2022a. The dominant influencing factors of desertification changes in the source region of Yellow River: Climate change or human activity? Science of the Total Environment, 813: 152512, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo B, Yang F, Fan J, et al. 2022b. The changes of spatiotemporal pattern of rocky desertification and its dominant driving factors in typical karst mountainous areas under the background of global change. Remote Sensing, 14(10): 2351, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey S P, Cohen W B, Yang Z Q, et al. 2005. Comparison of tasseled cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection. Remote Sensing of Environment, 97(3): 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill M J, Senarath U, Lee A, et al. 2006. Assessment of the MODIS LAI product for Australian ecosystems. Remote Sensing of Environment, 101(4): 495–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Jiapaer G, Bao A, et al. 2019. Monitoring the long-term desertification process and assessing the relative roles of its drivers in Central Asia. Ecological Indicators, 104: 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Liu Y, Wu S, et al. 2021. Analyzing ecological environment change and associated driving factors in China based on NDVI time series data. Ecological Indicators, 129: 107933, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Pei Y, Zhao S, et al. 2020a. A review of remote sensing for environmental monitoring in China. Remote Sensing, 12(7): 1130, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Shi X, Wu H, et al. 2020b. Trade-off between economic development and environmental governance in China: An analysis based on the effect of river chief system. China Economic Review, 60: 101403, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M M, Liu A, Zou C, et al. 2012. An overview of the “Three-North” Shelterbelt project in China. Forestry Studies in China, 14: 70–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhang C, Wang N, et al. 2017. Substantial inorganic carbon sink in closed drainage basins globally. Nature Geoscience, 10: 501–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Ding J, Rexiding M, et al. 2021. Characteristics of dust aerosols and identification of dust sources in Xinjiang, China. Atmospheric Environment, 262: 118651, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Li Y. 2017. Revitalize the world’s countryside. Nature, 548: 275–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Zang Y, Yang Y. 2020. China’s rural revitalization and development: Theory, technology and management. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30: 1923–1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Zhao T, Shi X, et al. 2018. Ecological restoration by afforestation may increase groundwater depth and create potentially large ecological and water opportunity costs in arid and semiarid China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176: 1213–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo M, Liu T, Meng F, et al. 2019. Identifying climate change impacts on water resources in Xinjiang, China. Science of the Total Environment, 676: 613–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Zhu J, Yan W, et al. 2021. Projections of desertification trends in Central Asia under global warming scenarios. Science of the Total Environment, 781: 146777, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhi Y, Franklin J, Seddon N, et al. 2020. Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1794): 20190104, doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mildrexler D J, Zhao M, Running S W. 2009. Testing a MODIS global disturbance index across North America. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(10): 2103–2117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Jia J, Liu Y, et al. 2018. Seasonal contrast of the dominant factors for spatial distribution of land surface temperature in urban areas. Remote Sensing of Environment, 215: 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Vik J O, Mysterud A, et al. 2005. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9): 503–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodell M, Famiglietti J S, Wiese D N, et al. 2018. Emerging trends in global freshwater availability. Nature, 557: 651–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistic Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. 2001–2020. Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamiminia H, Salehi B, Mahdianpari M, et al. 2020. Google Earth Engine for geo-big data applications: A meta-analysis and systematic review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 164: 152–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Ke X, Chen Y, et al. 2021. Which impacts more seriously on natural habitat loss and degradation? Cropland expansion or urban expansion?. Land Degradation & Development, 32(2): 946–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Jim C Y, Tao Y, et al. 2011. Landscape ecological assessment of green space fragmentation in Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(2): 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlassova L, Perez-Cabello F, Nieto H, et al. 2014. Assessment of methods for land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat-5 TM images applicable to multiscale tree-grass Ecosystem modeling. Remote Sensing, 6(5): 4345–4368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu B, Tian F, Zhang M, et al. 2020. Cloud services with big data provide a solution for monitoring and tracking sustainable development goals. Geography and Sustainability, 1(1): 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C C, Chen X W, Tao Y C, et al. 2005. Research on the application mode of spatial information technology for precision agriculture in Xinjiang. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS’ 05. Seoul: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Guo B, Fan J, et al. 2021. A novel remote sensing ecological vulnerability index on large scale: A case study of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor region. Ecological Indicators, 129: 107955, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R, Zhang S, Yu D W, et al. 2011. Effectiveness of China’s nature reserves in representing ecological diversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(7): 383–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie X, Li A, Jin H, et al. 2019. Assessment of five satellite-derived LAI datasets for GPP estimations through ecosystem models. Science of the Total Environment, 690: 1120–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Y, Xu W, Lu N, et al. 2021. Assessment of spatial-temporal changes of ecological environment quality based on RSEI and GEE: A case study in Erhai Lake Basin, Yunnan province, China. Ecological Indicators, 125: 107518, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu D, Yang F, Yu L, et al. 2021. Quantization of the coupling mechanism between eco-environmental quality and urbanization from multisource remote sensing data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321: 128948, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Wang M, Shi T, et al. 2018. Prediction of ecological effects of potential population and impervious surface increases using a remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI). Ecological Indicators, 93: 730–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Wang Y, Guan H, et al. 2019. Detecting ecological changes with a remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI) produced time series and change vector analysis. Remote Sensing, 11(20): 2345, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11202345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Yang W, Chen S, et al. 2020. Establishing a model to predict the single boll weight of cotton in northern Xinjiang by using high resolution UAV remote sensing data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 179: 105762, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Chau S N, Chen X, et al. 2020. Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time. Nature, 577: 74–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue L, Wang J, Zhang L, et al. 2019. Spatiotemporal analysis of ecological vulnerability and management in the Tarim River Basin, China. Science of the Total Environment, 649: 876–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue Y, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. 2021. Assessing the vulnerability and adaptation strategies of wild camel to climate change in the Kumtag Desert of China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 29: e01725, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Meng F, Fu P, et al. 2021. Spatiotemporal change and driving factors of the eco-environment quality in the Yangtze River Basin from 2001 to 2019. Ecological Indicators, 131: 108214, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Chen Y, Wu Z, et al. 2019. Spatial heterogeneity of the thermal environment based on the urban expansion of natural cities using open data in Guangzhou, China. Ecological Indicators, 104: 524–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao J, Hu W, Chen Y, et al. 2019. Hydro-climatic changes and their impacts on vegetation in Xinjiang, Central Asia. Science of the Total Environment, 660: 724–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao J, Mao W, Chen J, et al. 2021. Recent signal and impact of wet-to-dry climatic shift in Xinjiang, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31: 1283–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Fu L, Zou Y, et al. 2021. Spatiotemporal change detection of ecological quality and the associated affecting factors in Dongting Lake Basin, based on RSEI. Journal of Cleaner Production, 302: 126995, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue H, Liu Y, Li Y, et al. 2019. Eco-environmental quality assessment in China’s 35 major cities based on remote sensing ecological index. IEEE Access, 7: 51295–51311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Peng C, Li W, et al. 2016. Multiple afforestation programs accelerate the greenness in the ‘Three North’ region of China from 1982 to 2013. Ecological Indicators, 61: 404–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Xia F, Yang D, et al. 2020. Spatiotemporal characteristics in ecosystem service value and its interaction with human activities in Xinjiang, China. Ecological Indicators, 110: 105826, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Z, Wu Z, Chen Y, et al. 2020. Exploration of eco-environment and urbanization changes in coastal zones: A case study in China over the past 20 years. Ecological Indicators, 119: 106847, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Z, Wu Z, Chen Y, et al. 2022. Instability of remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI) and its improvement for time series analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 814: 152595, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang Q, Shao Z, Huang X, et al. 2021. Evolution of soil salinization under the background of landscape patterns in the irrigated northern slopes of Tianshan Mountains, Xinjiang, China. CATENA, 206: 105561, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo L, Zhang Z, Carlson K M, et al. 2018. Progress towards sustainable intensification in China challenged by land-use change. Nature Sustainability, 1: 304–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Key Laboratory Open Subjects of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Science and Technology Department (2020D04038), the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2021D01D06) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41961059). We are especially grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editors for appraising our manuscript and for offering instructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Geography and Remote Sensing Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 800046, China

    Jinjie Wang, Jianli Ding, Xiangyu Ge, Shaofeng Qin & Zhe Zhang

  2. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, China

    Jinjie Wang, Jianli Ding, Xiangyu Ge, Shaofeng Qin & Zhe Zhang

  3. Key Laboratory of Smart City and Environment Modelling of Higher Education Institute, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, 830046, China

    Jinjie Wang, Jianli Ding, Xiangyu Ge, Shaofeng Qin & Zhe Zhang

Authors
  1. Jinjie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianli Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiangyu Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shaofeng Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhe Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianli Ding.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Ding, J., Ge, X. et al. Assessment of ecological quality in Northwest China (2000–2020) using the Google Earth Engine platform: Climate factors and land use/land cover contribute to ecological quality. J. Arid Land 14, 1196–1211 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-022-0085-x

Download citation

  • Received: 10 July 2022

  • Revised: 13 October 2022

  • Accepted: 16 October 2022

  • Published: 02 November 2022

  • Issue Date: November 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-022-0085-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • ecological quality
  • land use/land cover
  • spatiotemporal change
  • remote sensing ecological index (RSEI)
  • Google Earth Engine
  • Xinjiang
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.