Skip to main content

Can climate change influence agricultural GTFP in arid and semi-arid regions of Northwest China?

Journal of Arid Land volume 12, pages 837–853 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

There are eight provinces and autonomous regions (Gansu Province, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Tibet Autonomous Region, Qinghai Province, Shanxi Province, and Shaanxi Province) in Northwest China, most areas of which are located in arid and semi-arid regions (northwest of the 400 mm precipitation line), accounting for 58.74% of the country’s land area and sustaining approximately 7.84×106 people. Because of drought conditions and fragile ecology, these regions cannot develop agriculture at the expense of the environment. Given the challenges of global warming, the green total factor productivity (GTFP), taking CO2 emissions as an undesirable output, is an effective index for measuring the sustainability of agricultural development. Agricultural GTFP can be influenced by both internal production factors (labor force, machinery, land, agricultural plastic film, diesel, pesticide, and fertilizer) and external climate factors (temperature, precipitation, and sunshine duration). In this study, we used the Super-slacks-based measure (Super-SBM) model to measure agricultural GTFP during the period 2000–2016 at the regional level. Our results show that the average agricultural GTFP of most provinces and autonomous regions in arid and semi-arid regions underwent a fluctuating increase during the study period (2000–2016), and the fluctuation was caused by the production factors (input and output factors). To improve agricultural GTFP, Shaanxi, Shanxi, and Gansu should reduce agricultural labor force input; Shaanxi, Inner Mongolia, Gansu, and Shanxi should decrease machinery input; Shaanxi, Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, and Shanxi should reduce fertilizer input; Shaanxi, Xinjiang, Gansu, and Ningxia should reduce diesel input; Xinjiang and Gansu should decrease plastic film input; and Gansu, Shanxi, and Inner Mongolia should cut pesticide input. Desirable output agricultural earnings should be increased in Qinghai and Tibet, and undesirable output (CO2 emissions) should be reduced in Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, Gansu, and Shaanxi. Agricultural GTFP is influenced not only by internal production factors but also by external climate factors. To determine the influence of climate factors on GTFP in these provinces and autonomous regions, we used a Geographical Detector (Geodetector) model to analyze the influence of climate factors (temperature, precipitation, and sunshine duration) and identify the relationships between different climate factors and GTFP. We found that temperature played a significant role in the spatial heterogeneity of GTFP among provinces and autonomous regions in arid and semi-arid regions. For Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Tibet, a suitable average annual temperature would be in the range of 7°C–9°C; for Gansu, Shanxi, and Ningxia, it would be 11°C–13°C; and for Shaanxi, it would be 15°C–17°C. Stable climatic conditions and more efficient production are prerequisites for the development of sustainable agriculture. Hence, in the agricultural production process, reducing the redundancy of input factors is the best way to reduce CO2 emissions and to maintain temperatures, thereby improving the agricultural GTFP. The significance of this study is that it explores the impact of both internal production factors and external climatic factors on the development of sustainable agriculture in arid and semi-arid regions, identifying an effective way forward for the arid and semi-arid regions of Northwest China.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Andersen P, Petersen N C. 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10): 1261–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blancard S, Martin E. 2014. Energy efficiency measurement in agriculture with imprecise energy content information. Energy Policy, 66: 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen P C, Yu M M, Chang C C, et al. 2008. Total factor productivity growth in China’s agricultural sector. China Economic Review, 19(4): 580–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Huffman W E, Rozelle S. 2009. Farm technology and technical efficiency: Evidence from four regions in China. China Economic Review, 20(2): 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng G. 2014. Data Envelopment Analysis: Methods and MaxDEA Software. Beijing: Intellectual Property Right Press, 180–189. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai A G. 2011. Drought under global warming: a review. Climate Change, 2(1): 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng X Z, Gibson J, Wang P. 2017. Management of trade-offs between cultivated land conversions and land productivity in Shandong Province. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142: 767–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan H P, Zhang Y, Zhao J B, et al. 2011. Carbon footprint analysis of farm land ecosystem in China. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 25(5): 203–208. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng C P, Chu F, Ding J J, et al. 2015. Carbon Emissions Abatement (CEA) allocation and compensation schemes based on DEA. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 53: 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Z M, Yang Y Z, Zhang Y Q, et al. 2005. Grain-for-green policy and its impacts on grain supply in West China. Land Use Policy, 22(4): 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G, Winiwarter W, Ermolieva T, et al. 2010. Integrated modeling framework for assessment and mitigation of nitrogen pollution from agriculture: concept and case study for China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 136(1–2): 116–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuinhas J A, Marques A C, Almeida P, et al. 2016. Two centuries of economic growth: international evidence on deepness and steepness. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15(3): 192–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan Y T, Kadambot H M S, Turner N C, et al. 2013. Ridge-furrow mulching systems—an innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid rain-fed environments. Advances in Agronomy, 118: 429–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollin D, Parente S L, Rogerson R. 2007. The food problem and the evolution of international income levels. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(4): 1230–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He F, Wang K, Li X L, et al. 2012. Effects of ridge and furrow rainfall harvesting system of on soil hydrothermal condition and yields of Elymus Sibiricus L. in arid and semiarid regions. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 28(12): 122–126. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidari M D, Omid M, Mohammadi A. 2012. Measuring productive efficiency of horticultural greenhouses in Iran: a data envelopment analysis approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1): 1040–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Q, Pan F F, Pan X B, et al. 2014. Effects of a ridge-furrow micro-field rainwater-harvesting system on potato yield in a semiarid region. Field Crops Research, 166(9): 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Santibanez-Gonzalez E D, Song M. 2018. Interstate pollution spillover and setting environmental standards. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170: 1544–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito J. 2010. Inter-regional difference of agricultural productivity in China: distinction between biochemical and machinery technology. China Economic Review, 21(3): 394–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin G, Li Z H, Deng X Z, et al. 2018. An analysis of spatiotemporal patterns in Chinese agricultural productivity between 2004 and 2014. Ecological Indicators, 2019: 591–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerstens K, Shen Z, Ignace V D W. 2018. Comparing Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators: how well is total factor productivity approximated? International Journal of Production Economics, 195: 311–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko A N, Bullock D G. 2000. Correlation of corn and soybean grain yield with topography and soil properties. Agronomy Journal, 92(1): 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee E A, Tollenaar M. 2007. Physiological basis of successful breeding strategies for maize grain yields. Crop Science, 47(Suppl.): S202–S215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei Y D, Zhang H L, Chen F, et al. 2016. How rural land use management facilitates drought risk adaptation in a changing climate—a case study in arid Northern China. Science of the Total Environment, 550: 192–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leng G Y, Tang Q H, Rayburg S. 2015. Climate change impacts on meteorological, agricultural and hydrological droughts in China. Global and Planetary Change, 126: 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X Y, Gong J D. 2002. Effect of different ridge: furrow ratios and supplement irrigation on crop production in ridge and furrow rainfall harvesting system with mulches. Agricultural Water Management, 54(3): 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liobikiene G, Mandravickaite J, Krepstuliene D, et al. 2017. Lithuanian achievements in terms of CO2 emissions based on production side in the context of the EU-27. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23(3): 483–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J Y, Xu X L, Zhuang D F, et al. 2005. Impacts of LUCC processes on potential land productivity in China in the 1990s. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 48(8): 1259–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Liu H, Qi Y J. 2015. Construction land expansion and cultivated land protection in urbanizing China: insights from national land surveys, 1996–2006. Habitat International, 46:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Zhang J B, Zhang L. 2018. Analysis of carbon emission efficiency of rice in China under different rice planting patterns based on the DEA-SBM model. Journal of China Agricultural University, 23(6): 177–186. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Guan D B, Crawford-Brown D, et al. 2013. Energy policy: a low-carbon road map for China. Nature, 500(7461): 143–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Davis S J, Feng K S, et al. 2016. Targeted opportunities to address the climate-trade dilemma in China. Nature Climate Change, 6(2): 201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell D B, Burke M B, Tebaldi C, et al. 2008. Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science, 319(5863): 607–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma S Z, Feng H. 2013. Will the decline of efficiency in China’s agriculture come to an end? An analysis based on opening and convergence. China Economic Review, 27:179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald D, Crabtree J R, Wiesinger G, et al. 2000. Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. Journal of Environmental Management, 59(1): 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makijenko J, Burlakovs J, Brizga J, et al. 2016. Energy efficiency and behavioral patterns in Latvia. Management of Environmental Quality, 27(6): 695–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L, Kay B D, Hu C S, et al. 2009. Visual assessment of soil structure: evaluation of methodologies on sites in Canada, China and Germany: part I: comparing visual methods and linking them with soil physical data and grain yield of cereals. Soil & Tillage Research, 103(1): 178–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistical of China). 2001–2017a. China Rural Statistical Yearbook 2000–2016. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistical of China). 2001–2017b. China Statistical Yearbook 2000–2016. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigussie Z, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, et al. 2017. Factors influencing small-scale farmers’ adoption of sustainable land management technologies in north-western Ethiopia. Land Use Policy, 67: 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen J E, Bindi M. 2002. Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. European Journal of Agronomy, 16(4): 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang J X, Chen X P, Zhang Z L, et al. 2016. Measuring eco-efficiency of agriculture in China. Sustainability, 8(4): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters C J, Wilkins J L, Fick G W. 2007. Testing a complete-diet model for estimating the land resource requirements of food consumption and agricultural carrying capacity: the New York State example. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 22(2): 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piao S L, Ciais P, Huang Y, et al. 2010. The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature, 467(7311): 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce C, Guillermo E, Moran M S, et al. 2013. Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic condition. Nature, 470(1): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren W, Tian H Q, Tao B, et al. 2012. China’s crop productivity and soil carbon storage as influenced by multifactor global change. Global Change Biology, 18(9): 2945–2957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigoberto A L, Xi H, Eleonora D F. 2017. What drives China’s new agricultural subsidies? World Development, 93: 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleska S R, Didan K, Huete A R, et al. 2007. Amazon forests green-up during 2005 drought. Science, 318(5850): 612–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford L M, Zhu J. 2002. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142: 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield J, Wood E F. 2008. Projected changes in drought occurrence under future global warming from multi-model, multi-scenario, IPCC AR4 simulations. Climate Dynamics, 31(1): 79–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Z Y, Baležentis T, Chen X L, et al. 2018. Green growth and structural change in Chinese agricultural sector during 1997–2014. China Economic Review, 51: 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song M L, Wang S H, Cen L. 2015. Comprehensive efficiency evaluation of coal enterprises from production and pollution treatment process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 104: 374–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song M L, Zheng W P, Wang Z Y. 2016. Environmental efficiency and energy consumption of highway transportation systems in China. International Journal of Production Economics, 181: 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao F L, Yokozawa M, Xu Y L, et al. 2006. Climate changes and trends in phenology and yields of field crops in China, 1981–2000. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 138(1–4): 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian X, Yu X H. 2012. The enigmas of TFP in China: a meta-analysis. China Economic Review, 23(2): 396–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K. 2002. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1): 32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth K E, Dai A G, Schrier G V D, et al. 2014. Global warming and changes in drought. Nature Climate Change, 4(1): 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner N C. 2004. Sustainable production of crops and pastures under drought in a Mediterranean environment. Annals of Applied Biology, 144(2): 139–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ittersum M K, Leffelaar P A, Van Keulen H. 2003. On approaches and applications of Wageningen crop models. European Journal of Agronomy, 18(3–4): 201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang A H, Lettenmaier D P, Sheffield J. 2011. Soil moisture drought in China, 1950–2006. Journal of Climate, 24(13): 3257–3271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang F T, Yu C, Xiong L C, et al. 2019. How can agricultural water use efficiency be promoted in China? A spatial-temporal analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 145: 411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J F, Li X H, Christakos G, et al. 2010. Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun region, China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(1): 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J F, Zhang T L, Fu B J. 2016. A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity. Ecological Indicators, 67: 250–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J F, Xu C D. 2017. Geographical detector: principles and prospects. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1): 116–134. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Wei Y M, Huang Z M. 2016. Potential gains from carbon emissions trading in China: A DEA based estimation on abatement cost savings. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 63: 48–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y J, Xie Z K, Malhi S S, et al. 2011. Effects of gravel-sand mulch, plastic mulch and ridge and furrow rainfall harvesting system combinations on water use efficiency, soil temperature and watermelon yield in a semi-arid Loess Plateau of northwestern China. Agricultural Water Management, 10(1): 88–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y R. 1995. Productivity growth, technological progress, and technical efficiency change in China: A three-sector analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics, 21(2): 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao G J, Zhang Q B, Zhang F J, et al. 2016. Warming influences the yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in the semiarid regions of Northwest China. Field Crops Research, 199: 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S W, Li G Q, Li Z M. 2015. China agricultural outlook for 2015–2024 based on China Agricultural Monitoring and Early-warning System (CAMES). Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14(9): 1889–1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y B, Li J Y, Wan J M. 2017. Agriculture and crop science in China: innovation and sustainability. Crop Journal, 5(2): 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y B, Wang R Y, Yang J H, et al. 2011. Impact of climate warming on flax growth and water use efficiency in semiarid regions of the loess plateau. Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(10): 2635–2642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B C. 2008. Discussion on basic characteristics and developmental status of rainfall-harvesting technique in arid areas. Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 27(2): 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C J, Liao Y M, Duan J Q, et al. 2016. The progresses of dry-wet climate divisional research in China. Research in Climate Change Progress, 12(4): 261–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Pang J X, Chen X P, et al. 2019. Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from the agricultural sector of China’s main grain-producing areas. Science of the Total Environment, 665: 1017–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Wang R Y, Ma B L. 2014. Ridge-furrow with full plastic film mulching improves water use efficiency and tuber yields of potato in a semiarid rainfed ecosystem. Field Crops Research, 161: 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L M, Jin S L, Liu C A, et al. 2012. Ridge-furrow and plastic-mulching tillage enhances maize-soil interactions: opportunities and challenges in a semiarid agroecosystem. Field Crops Research, 126: 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71974176, 71473233), the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) “Light of West China” Program (2018-XBQNXZ-B-017), the High Level Talent Introduction Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Y942171), and the “High Talents Program of Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, CAS” (Y871171).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China

    Jian Feng & Lingdi Zhao

  2. Institute of Marine Development, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China

    Lingdi Zhao

  3. School of Foreign Languages, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China

    Yibo Zhang

  4. Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, 830011, China

    Lingxiao Sun, Xiang Yu & Yang Yu

  5. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Yang Yu

Authors
  1. Jian Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lingdi Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yibo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lingxiao Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yang Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lingdi Zhao or Yang Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, J., Zhao, L., Zhang, Y. et al. Can climate change influence agricultural GTFP in arid and semi-arid regions of Northwest China?. J. Arid Land 12, 837–853 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-020-0073-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-020-0073-y

Keywords

  • climate change
  • agricultural GTFP
  • Super-slacks-based measure (Super-SBM) model
  • Geodetector
  • CO2 emissions
  • arid regions
  • semi-arid regions