Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prioritizing woody species for the rehabilitation of arid lands in western Iran based on soil properties and carbon sequestration

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plants are an important component in many natural ecosystems. They influence soil properties, especially in arid ecosystems. The selection of plant species based on their adaptations to site conditions is essential for rehabilitation of degraded sites and other construction sites such as check-dams. Other factors to be considered in species selection include their effects on soil properties and their abilities to meet other management objectives. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of native (Populus euphratica Oliv. and Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb.) and introduced (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. and Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC.) woody species on soil properties and carbon sequestration (CS) in an arid region of Iran. Soil sampling was collected at three soil depths (0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm) at the sites located under each woody species canopy and in an open area in 2017. Soil physical-chemical property was analyzed in the laboratory. The presence of a woody species changed soil characteristics and soil CS, compared with the open area. For example, the presence of a woody species caused a decrease in soil bulk density, of which the lowest value was observed under E. camaldulensis (1.38 g/cm3) compared with the open area (1.59 g/cm3). Also, all woody species significantly increased the contents of soil organic matter and total nitrogen, and introduced species had more significant effect than native species. The results showed that CS significantly increased under the canopy of all woody species in a decreasing order of P. euphratica (9.08 t/hm2)>E. camaldulensis (8.37 t/hm2)>P. juliflora (5.20 t/hm2)>T. ramosissima (2.93 t/hm2)>open area (1.33 t/hm2), thus demonstrating the positive effect of a woody species on CS. Although the plantation of non-native species had some positive effects on soil properties, we recommend increasing species diversity in plantations of native and introduced woody species to provide more diversity for the increased ecosystem services, resilience, health and long-term productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arndt S K, Arampatsis C, Foetzki A, et al. 2004. Contrasting patterns of leaf solute accumulation and salt adaptation in four phreatophytic desert plants in a hyperarid desert with saline groundwater. Journal of Arid Environments, 59(2): 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arriaga L, Maya Y. 2007. Spatial variability in decomposition rates in a desert scrub of northwestern Mexico. Plant Ecology, 189(2): 213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett R. 2005. The Biology of Soil: A Community and Ecosystem Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, et al. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67: 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley D, Fisher R F. 2012. Ecology and Management of Forest Soils. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 75–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black G R, Hartge K H. 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute A. Method of Soil Analysis. Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Method of Soil Analysis. Part I. (2nd ed.) Agronomy Monograph No. 9 (Part 1). Madison: American Society of Agronomy Inc., 363–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner J M, Mulvaney C S. 1982. Nitrogen—total. In: Page A L. Methods of Soil Analysis, Madison: American Society of Agronomy Inc., 595–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan K E, Christie F J, York A. 2009. Global climate change and litter decomposition: more frequent fire slows decomposition and increases the functional importance of invertebrates. Global Change Biology, 15(12): 2958–2971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner M Z. 2012. Water and Soil Characterization, pH and Electrical Conductivity. Montana: Montana State University Bozeman, 15–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnol M, Bazgir M. 2013. Nutrient return to the forest floor through litter and throughfall under 7 forest species after conversion from Norway spruce. Forest Ecology and Management, 309: 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang C, Sommerfeldt T G, Carefoot J M, et al. 1983. Relationships of electrical conductivity with total dissolved salts and cation concentration of sulfate-dominant soil extracts. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 63(1): 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L F, He Z B, Zhu X, et al. 2016. Impacts of afforestation on plant diversity, soil properties, and soil organic carbon storage in a semi-arid grassland of northwestern China. Catena, 147: 300–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen J H, Grootemaat S, Verheijen LM, et al. 2017. Are litter decomposition and fire linked through plant species traits? New Phytologist, 216(3): 653–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Deyn G B, Cornelissen J H, Bardgett R D. 2008. Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. Ecology Letters, 11(5): 516–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley K A, Kelly E F, Hofstede R G. 2004. Soil organic carbon and water retention after conversion of grasslands to pine plantations in the Ecuadorian Andes. Ecosystems, 7(7): 729–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Livečková M, Albrechtová J, et al. 2013. Is the effect of trees on soil properties mediated by soil fauna? A case study from post-mining sites. Forest Ecology and Management, 309: 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaur M K, Squires V R. 2018. Geographic extent and characteristics of the world’s arid zones and their peoples. In: Mahesh K G Victor R S. Climate Variability Impacts on Land Use and Livelihoods in Drylands. Switzerland: Springer, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünzweig J M, Lin T, Rotenberg E, et al. 2003. Carbon sequestration in arid-land forest. Global Change Biology, 9(5): 791–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habashi H, Moslehi M, Shabani E, et al. 2019. Chemical content and seasonal variation of throughfall and litterflow under individual trees in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 38(2): 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen-Thorn A, Callesen I, Armolaitis K, et al. 2004. The impact of six European tree species on the chemistry of mineral topsoil in forest plantations on former agricultural land. Forest Ecology and Management, 195: 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havlin J L, Tisdale S L, Nelson W L, et al. 2016. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. Delhi: Pearson India Education, 215–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershot, W H, Duquette M. 1986. Exchangeable cation and effective CEC by the BaCl2 method. In: Carter M R. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC, 168–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydari M, Prévosto B, Abdi T, et al. 2017. Establishment of oak seedlings in historically disturbed sites: Regeneration success as a function of stand structure and soil characteristics. Ecological Engineering, 107: 172–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isichei A O, Muoghalu J I. 1992. The effects of tree canopy cover on soil fertility in a Nigerian savanna. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 8(3): 329–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalinda C, Mburu D, Ngamau K, et al. 2015. Short term leguminous trees-tillage interactions and their effect on soil-water content in a semi-arid agroforestry parkland. Open Journal of Forestry, 5(7): 668–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klute A. 1986. Water retension laboratory methods. In: Page A L, Miller R H, Keeney D R. Method of Soil Analysis Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Madison: American Society of Agronomy Inc., 635–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooch Y, Rostayee F, Hosseini S M. 2016. Effects of tree species on topsoil properties and nitrogen cycling in natural forest and tree plantations of northern Iran. Catena, 144: 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R. 2001. Potential of desertification control to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Climatic Change, 51(1): 35–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304(5677): 1623–1627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K H, Jose S. 2005. Nitrate leaching in cottonwood and loblolly pine biomass plantations along a nitrogen fertilization gradient. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 105(4): 615–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li P X, Wang N, He W M, et al. 2008. Fertile islands under Artemisia ordosica in inland dunes of northern China: effects of habitats and plant developmental stages. Journal of Arid Environments, 72(6): 953–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Q, Fehmi J S, Zhang D, et al. 2017. Changes in wind erosion over a 25-year restoration chronosequence on the south edge of the Tengger Desert, China: implications for preventing desertification. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(9): 463.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch C E, Neuhaus J M. 2005. Generalized linear mixed models. In: Peter A, Theodore C. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiresonne L, Schrijver A D, Vos B D. 2006. Nutrient cycling in a poplar plantation (Populus trichocarpa×Populus deltoids ‘Beaupré’) on former agricultural land in northern Belgium. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37(1): 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modarres R, da Silva V D P R. 2007. Rainfall trends in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran. Journal of Arid Environments, 70(2): 344–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero L L, Delitti W. 2017. Effects of Eucalyptus and Pinus forest management on soil organic carbon in Brazilian wooded savanna. In: Gopal S, Sumit C. Forest Biomass and Carbon. London: IntechOpen Limited, doi: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson D W, Sommers L E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page A L. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3—Chemical Methods. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, 961–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyssen J, Haile M, Naudts J, et al. 2009. Desertification? Northern Ethiopia re-photographed after 140 years. Science of the Total Environment, 407(8): 2749–2755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obalum S E, Chibuike G U, Peth S, et al. 2017. Soil organic matter as sole indicator of soil degradation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(4): 176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet F G, Kindt R, et al. 2018. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. [2019-01-17] https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.

  • Olsen S R, Sommers L E. 1982. Phosphorus. In: Page A L. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2 (2nd ed.). Madison: American Society of Agronomy Inc., 403–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pei Z, Eichenberg D, Bruelheide H, et al. 2016. Soil and tree species traits both shape soil microbial communities during early growth of Chinese subtropical forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 96: 180–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Bejarano A, Mataix-Solera J, Zornoza R, et al. 2010. Influence of plant species on physical, chemical and biological soil properties in a Mediterranean forest soil. European Journal of Forest Research, 129(1): 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott C E. 2002. The influence of the forest canopy on nutrient cycling. Tree Physiology, 22(15–16): 1193–1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin Z, Dunn J B, Kwon H, et al. 2016. Soil carbon sequestration and land use change associated with biofuel production: empirical evidence. GCB Bioenergy, 8(1): 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quideau S A, Chadwick O A, Benesi A, et al. 2001. A direct link between forest vegetation type and soil organic matter composition. Geoderma, 104(1–2): 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team, 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [2019-05-21]. http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Reubens B, Moeremans C, Poesen J, et al. 2011. Tree species selection for land rehabilitation in Ethiopia: from fragmented knowledge to an integrated multi-criteria decision approach. Agroforestry Systems, 82(3): 303–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm J. 2011. Desertification: The next dust bowl. Nature, 478(7370): 450–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk H J, Jackson R B. 2002. Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 90(3): 480–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh K, Chauhan H S, Rajput D K. 1989. Report of a 60 month study on litter production, changes in soil chemical properties and productivity under poplar (P. deltoides) and eucalyptus (E. hybrid) interplanted with aromatic grasses. Agroforestry Systems, 9(1): 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song X P, Hansen M C, Stehman S V, et al. 2018. Global land change from 1982 to 2016. Nature, 560(7720): 639–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg J C, Chew M K, Nagler P L, et al. 2009. Changing perceptions of change: the role of scientists in Tamarix and river management. Restoration Ecology, 17(2): 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summer M E, Miller W P. 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficient. In: Sparks D L. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Madison: American Society of Agronomy Ltc., 1201–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verón S R, Blanco L J, Texeira M A. 2018. Desertification and ecosystem services supply: The case of the arid Chaco of South America. Journal of Arid Environments, 159: 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg A C, Blaser W J, Gattinger A, et al. 2017. Does shade tree diversity increase soil fertility in cocoa plantations?. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 248: 190–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil R R, Brady N C. 2015. The Nature and Properties of Soils (15th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M C, Wardle G M. 2007. Pine and eucalypt litterfall in a pine-invaded eucalypt woodland: the role of fire and canopy cover. Forest Ecology and Management, 253(1–3): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xuluc-Tolosa F J, Vester H F, Ramírez-Marcial N, et al. 2003. Leaf litter decomposition of tree species in three successional phases of tropical dry secondary Forest in Campeche, Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management, 174(1–3): 401–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Liu N, Zhang Y J. 2019. Soil aggregates regulate the impact of soil bacterial and fungal communities on soil respiration. Geoderma, 337: 444–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagatto M R, de Araujo Pereira A P, de Souza A J, et al. 2019. Interactions between mesofauna, microbiological and chemical soil attributes in pure and intercropped Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mangium plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 433: 240–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamani T, Karimi H, Tavakoli M, et al. 2018. Factors affecting the groundwater drawdown in Mehran Plain, Ilam Province. Hydrogeology, 2(2): 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H L, Guo Y R, Zhou R L, et al. 2011. The effects of plantation development on biological soil crust and topsoil properties in a desert in northern China. Geoderma, 160(3–4): 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H L, Zhou R L, Zhang T H, et al. 2006. Effects of desertification on soil and crop growth properties in Horqin sandy cropland of Inner Mongolia, north China. Soil and Tillage Research, 87(2): 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Ilam University, Iran for the financial support of the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water and Soil Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, 6939177111, Iran

    Masoud Bazgir & Masoud Hamidi

  2. Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resource and Earth Science, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran

    Reza Omidipour

  3. Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, 6939177111, Iran

    Mehdi Heydari & Nasim Zainali

  4. US Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Columbia, OM, 65211, USA

    Daniel C. Dey

Authors
  1. Masoud Bazgir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reza Omidipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehdi Heydari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nasim Zainali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Masoud Hamidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daniel C. Dey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Bazgir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bazgir, M., Omidipour, R., Heydari, M. et al. Prioritizing woody species for the rehabilitation of arid lands in western Iran based on soil properties and carbon sequestration. J. Arid Land 12, 640–652 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-020-0013-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-020-0013-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation