Wind tunnel experiments on dust emissions from different landform types

  • Wei Wu
  • Ping Yan
  • Yong Wang
  • Miao Dong
  • Xiaonan Meng
  • Xinran Ji
Article

Abstract

The measurement and assessment of dust emissions from different landforms are important to understand the atmospheric loading of PM10 (particulate matter ≤10 μm aerodynamic diameter) and to assess natural sources of dust; however, the methodology and technique for determining the dust still present significant research challenges. In the past, specialized field observation and field wind tunnel studies have been used to understand the dust emission. A series of wind tunnel tests were carried out to identify natural sources of dust and measure the magnitudes of dust emissions from different landforms. The method used in this study allowed the measurement of the PM10 emission rate using a laboratory based environmental boundary layer wind tunnel. Results indicated that PM10 emissions demonstrated strong temporal variation and were primarily driven by aerodynamic entrainment. Sand dunes, playa, and alluvial fans had the largest dust emission rates (0.8–5.4 mg/(m2•s)) while sandy gravel, Gobi desert and abandoned lands had the lowest emission rates (0.003–0.126 mg/(m2•s)). Dust emissions were heavily dependent on the surface conditions, especially the availability of loose surface dust. High dust emissions were a result of the availability of dust-particle materials for entrainment while low dust emissions were a result of surface crusts and gravel cover. Soil surface property (surface crusts and gravel cover) plays an important role in controlling the availability of dust-sized particles for entrainment. The dust emission rate depended not only on the surface conditions but also on the friction velocity. The emission rate of PM10 varies as a power function of the friction velocity. Although dynamic abrasion processes have a strong influence on the amount of dust entrainment, aerodynamic entrainment may provide an important mechanism for dust emissions. Large volumes of dust entrained by aerodynamic entrainment can not only occur at low shear velocity without saltation, but may dominate the entrainment process in many arid and semi-arid environments. So it may also be responsible for large magnitude dust storms. Playa and alluvial fan landforms, prior to developing a surface crust, may be the main sources of dust storms in Qinghai Province.

Keywords

emission rates PM10 fugitive dust landforms wind tunnel dust dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2016YFA0601901, 2013CB956001).

References

  1. Alfaro S C, Rajot J L, Nickling W. 2004. Estimation of PM20 emissions by wind erosion: main sources of uncertainties. Geomorphology, 59(1–4): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avila A, Alarcon M, Queralt I. 1998. The chemical composition of dust transported in red rains—its contribution to the biogeochemical cycle of a holm oak forest in Catalonia (Spain). Atmospheric Environment, 32(2): 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biamah E K. 2005. Coping with Drought: Options for Soil and Water Management in Semi-Arid Kenya. Netherlands: Wageningen University and Research Centre, 159–164.Google Scholar
  4. Bryant R G. 2003. Monitoring hydrological controls on dust emissions: preliminary observations from Etosha Pan, Namibia. The Geographical Journal, 169(2): 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bullard J E, Harrison S P, Baddock M C, et al. 2011. Preferential dust sources: A geomorphological classification designed for use in global dust-cycle models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 116(F4): FO4034.Google Scholar
  6. Chen W N, Dong Z B, Li Z S, et al. 1996. Wind tunnel test of the influence of moisture on the erodibility of loessial sandy loam soils by wind. Journal of Arid Environments, 34(4): 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chin M, Diehl T, Ginoux P, et al. 2007. Intercontinental transport of pollution and dust aerosols: implications for regional air quality. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7(21): 5501–5517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong Z B, Sun H Y, Zhao A G. 2004. WITSEG sampler: a segmented sand sampler for wind tunnel test. Geomorphology, 59(1–4): 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eckardt F D, Kuring N. 2005. SeaWiFS identifies dust sources in the Namib Desert. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(19): 4159–4167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Etyemezian V, Nikolich G, Ahonen S, et al. 2007. The Portable in Situ Wind Erosion Laboratory (PI-SWERL): A new method to measure PM10 windblown dust properties and potential for emissions. Atmospheric Environment, 41(18): 3789–3796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Funk R, Reuter H I, Hoffmann C, et al. 2008. Effect of moisture on fine dust emission from tillage operations on agricultural soils. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 33(12): 1851–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goossens D, Offer Z Y. 2000. Wind tunnel and field calibration of six aeolian dust samplers. Atmospheric Environment, 34(7): 1043–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ginoux P, Prospero J M, Gill T E, et al. 2012. Global-scale attribution of anthropogenic and natural dust sources and their emission rates based on MODIS Deep Blue aerosol products. Reviews of Geophysics, 50(3): RG3005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill T E. 1996. Eolian sediments generated by anthropogenic disturbance of playas: human impacts on the geomorphic system and geomorphic impacts on the human system. Geomorphology, 17(1–3): 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gillette D A, Passi R. 1988. Modeling dust emission caused by wind erosion. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 93(D11): 14233–14242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goudie A, Middleton N J. 2001. Saharan dust storms: nature and consequences. Earth-Science Reviews, 56(1–4): 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goudie A, Middleton N J. 2006. Desert Dust in the Global System. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 156–164.Google Scholar
  18. Harrison S P, Kohfeld K E, Roelandt C, et al. 2001. The role of dust in climate changes today, at the last glacial maximum and in the future. Earth-Science Reviews, 54(1–3): 43–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Houser C A, Nickling W G. 2001. The emission and vertical flux of particulate matter < 10 μm from a disturbed clay-crusted surface. Sedimentology, 48(2): 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hahnenberger M, Nicoll K. 2014. Geomorphic and land cover identification of dust sources in the eastern Great Basin of Utah, U.S.A. Geomorphology, 204: 657–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jickells T D, An Z S, Andersen K K, et al. 2005. Global iron connections between desert dust, ocean biogeochemistry, and climate. Science, 308(5718): 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Katra I, Lancaster N. 2008. Surface-sediment dynamics in a dust source from spaceborne multispectral thermal infrared data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(7): 3212–3221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koven C D, Fung I. 2008. Identifying global dust source areas using high-resolution land surface form. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 113(D22): D22204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kohfeld K E, Reynolds R L, Pelletier J D, et al. 2005. Linking the scales of observation, process, and modeling of dust emissions. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 86(11): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loosmore G A, Hunt J R. 2000. Dust resuspension without saltation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 105(D16): 20663–20671.Google Scholar
  26. Leys J F, Raupach M R. 1991. Soil flux measurements using a portable wind erosion tunnel. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 29(4): 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leys J F, McTainsh G H. 1999. Dust and nutrient deposition to riverine environments of south-eastern Australia. Sairaanhoitaja, 46: 59–76.Google Scholar
  28. Lequy E, Legout A, Conil S, et al. 2013. Aeolian dust deposition rates in Northern French forests and inputs to their biogeochemical cycles. Atmospheric Environment, 80: 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lu H, Shao Y P. 1999. A new model for dust emission by saltation bombardment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104(D14): 16827–16842.Google Scholar
  30. Macpherson T, Nickling W G, Gillies J A, et al. 2008. Dust emissions from undisturbed and disturbed supply-limited desert surfaces. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 113(F2): F02S04.Google Scholar
  31. Marticorena B, Bergametti G. 1995. Modeling the atmospheric dust cycle: 1. Design of a soil-derived dust emission scheme. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 100(D8): 16415–16430.Google Scholar
  32. Mahowald N M, Kloster S, Engelstaedter S, et al. 2010. Observed 20th century desert dust variability: impact on climate and biogeochemistry. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(22): 10875–10893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller R L, Tegen I, Perlwitz J. 2004. Surface radiative forcing by soil dust aerosols and the hydrologic cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109(D4): D04203.Google Scholar
  34. Milton S F, Greed G, Brooks M E, et al. 2008. Modeled and observed atmospheric radiation balance during the West African dry season: Role of mineral dust, biomass burning aerosol, and surface albedo. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 113(D23): D00C02.Google Scholar
  35. Neff J C, Reynolds R L, Farmer G L, et al. 2007. The changing role of dust in biogeochemical cycling. In: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, V13F-01. Washington, DC: AGU.Google Scholar
  36. Nickling W G, Gillies J A. 1993. Dust emission and transport in Mali, West Africa. Sedimentology, 40(5): 859–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nickling W G, Neuman C M. 1997. Wind tunnel evaluation of a wedge-shaped aeolian sediment trap. Geomorphology, 18(3–4): 333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Okin G S, Mahowald N, Chadwick O A, et al. 2004. Impact of desert dust on the biogeochemistry of phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 18(2): GB2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Okin G S. 2005. Dependence of wind erosion and dust emission on surface heterogeneity: Stochastic modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 110(D11): D11208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prospero J M. 1999. Long-term measurements of the transport of African mineral dust to the southeastern United States: Implications for regional air quality. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104(D13): 15917–15927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prospero J M, Ginoux P, Torres O, et al. 2002. Environmental characterization of global, sources of atmospheric soil dust, identified with the nimbus 7 total ozone, mapping spectrometer, (toms) absorbing aerosol product. Reviews of Geophysics, 40(1), 2-1–2-31.Google Scholar
  42. Roney J A, White B R. 2004. Definition and measurement of dust Aeolian thresholds. Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface, 109(F1): F01013.Google Scholar
  43. Roney J A, White B R. 2006. Estimating fugitive dust emission rates using an environmental boundary layer wind tunnel. Atmospheric Environment, 40(40): 7668–7685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reheis M C. 2006. A 16-year record of eolian dust in Southern Nevada and California, USA: Controls on dust generation and accumulation. Journal of Arid Environments, 67(3): 487–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reheis M C, Budahn J R, Lamothe P J. 2002. Geochemical evidence for diversity of dust sources in the southwestern United States. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 66(9): 1569–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sassen K, DeMott P J, Prospero J M, et al. 2003. Saharan dust storms and indirect aerosol effects on clouds: CRYSTAL-FACE results. Geophysical Research Letters, 30(12): 1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shao Y, Raupach M R, Findlater P A. 1993. Effect of saltation bombardment on the entrainment of dust by wind. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 98(D7): 12719–12726.Google Scholar
  48. Shao Y P. 2001. A model for mineral dust emission. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106(D17): 20239–20254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Slingo A, Ackerman T P, Allan R P, et al. 2006. Observations of the impact of a major Saharan dust storm on the atmospheric radiation balance. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(24): l24817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith J L, Lee K. 2003. Soil as a source of dust and implications for human health. Advances in Agronomy, 80: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Solomon S, Plattner G K, Knutti R, et al. 2009. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(6): 1704–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sun J M, Zhang M Y, Liu T S. 2001. Spatial and temporal characteristics of dust storms in China and its surrounding regions, 1960–1999: Relations to source area and climate. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 106(D10): 10325–10333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swap R, Garstang M, Greco S, et al. 1992. Saharan dust in the Amazon Basin. Tellus B, 44(2): 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sweeney M R, McDonald E V, Etyemezian V. 2011. Quantifying dust emissions from desert landforms, eastern Mojave Desert, USA. Geomorphology, 135(1–2): 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xuan J, Sokolik I N, Hao J F, et al. 2004. Identification and characterization of sources of atmospheric mineral dust in East Asia. Atmospheric Environment, 38(36): 6239–6252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tegen I, Lacis A A. 1996. Modeling of particle size distribution and its influence on the radiative properties of mineral dust aerosol. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 101(D14): 19237–19244.Google Scholar
  57. Tegen I, Werner M, Harrison S P, et al. 2004. Relative importance of climate and land use in determining present and future global soil dust emission. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(5): l05105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang X M, Dong Z B, Zhang J W, et al. 2004. Modern dust storms in China: an overview. Journal of Arid Environments, 58(4): 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang X M, Xia D S, Wang T, et al. 2008. Dust sources in arid and semiarid China and southern Mongolia: impacts of geomorphological setting and surface materials. Geomorphology, 97(3–4): 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Washington R, Todd M, Middleton N J, et al. 2003. Dust-storm source areas determined by the total ozone monitoring spectrometer and surface observations. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(2): 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Webb N P, Strong C L. 2011. Soil erodibility dynamics and its representation for wind erosion and dust emission models. Aeolian Research, 3(2): 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wiggs G F S, Livingstone I, Warren A. 1996. The role of streamline curvature in sand dune dynamics: evidence from field and wind tunnel measurements. Geomorphology, 17(1–3): 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang B L, Tsunekawa A, Tsubo M. 2008. Contributions of sandy lands and stony deserts to long-distance dust emission in China and Mongolia during 2000–2006. Global and Planetary Change, 60(3–4): 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zender C S, Newman D, Torres O. 2003a. Spatial heterogeneity in Aeolian erodibility: Uniform, topographic, geomorphic, and hydrologic hypotheses. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 108(D17): 4543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zender C S, Bian H, Newman D. 2003b. Mineral Dust Entrainment and Deposition (DEAD) model: Description and 1990s dust climatology. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108(D14): 4416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang C L, Zou X Y, Yang P, et al. 2007. Wind tunnel test and 137Cs tracing study on wind erosion of several soils in Tibet. Soil and Tillage Research, 94(2): 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Wu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ping Yan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yong Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Miao Dong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiaonan Meng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xinran Ji
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Geographical ScienceBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource EcologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations