Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Variation and heritability of morphological and physiological traits among Leymus chinensis genotypes under different environmental conditions

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intraspecific trait variation and heritability in different environmental conditions not only suggest a potential for an evolutionary response but also have important ecological consequences at the population, community, and ecosystem levels. However, the contribution of quantitative trait variation within a grassland species to evolutionary responses or ecological consequences is seldom documented. Leymus chinensis is an important dominant species in semi-arid grasslands of China, which has seriously suffered from drought and high temperature stresses in recent decades. In the present study, we measured variation and heritability of 10 quantitative traits, namely the number of tillers, maximum shoot height, number of rhizomes, maximum rhizome length, rhizome mass, aboveground mass, root mass, maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pmax), specific leaf area (SLA), and leaf length to leaf width ratio (LL/LW), for 10 genotypes of L. chinensis under one non-stress (Ck) condition and three environmental stress conditions (i.e., drought (Dr), high temperature (Ht), and both drought and high temperature (DrHt)). Result indicated that (1) the interaction of genotype and environmental condition (G×E) was significant for 6 traits but not significant for the other 4 traits as shown by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), suggesting that different selection forces were placed for different traits on the factors dominating phenotypic responses to different environmental conditions. Moreover, these significant G×E effects on traits indicated significantly different phenotypic adaptive responses among L. chinensis genotypes to different environmental conditions. Additionally, individuals could be grouped according to environmental condition rather than genotype as shown by canonical discriminant analysis, indicating that environmental condition played a more important role in affecting phenotypic variation than genotype; (2) by one-way ANOVA, significant differences among L. chinensis genotypes were found in all 10 traits under Ck and Dr conditions, in 8 traits under DrHt condition and only in 4 traits under Ht condition; and (3) all 10 traits showed relatively low or non-measurable broad-sense heritability (H2) under stress conditions. However, the lowest H2 value for most traits did not occur under DrHt condition, which supported the hypothesis of 'unfavorable conditions have unpredictable effects' rather than 'unfavorable conditions decrease heritability'. Results from our experiment might aid to improve predictions on the potential impacts of climate changes on L. chinensis and eventually species conservation and ecosystem restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badyaev A V. 2005. Stress-induced variation in evolution: from behavioural plasticity to genetic assimilation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1566): 877–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y F, Han X G, Wu J G, et al. 2004. Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Nature, 431(7005): 181–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff A, Steinger T, Müller-Schärer H. 2010. The importance of plant provenance and genotypic diversity of seed material used for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology, 18(3): 338–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick D I, Amarasekare P, Araújo M S, et al. 2011. Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26(4): 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmantier A, Garant D. 2005. Environmental quality and evolutionary potential: lessons from wild populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1571): 1415–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Patton S C, McArt S H, Parachnowitsch A L, et al. 2011. A direct comparison of the consequences of plant genotypic and species diversity on communities and ecosystem function. Ecology, 92(4): 915–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen J H C, Lavorel S, Garnier E, et al. 2003. A handbook of protocols for standardized and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 51(4): 335–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford K M, Rudgers J A. 2013. Genetic diversity within a dominant plant outweighs plant species diversity in structuring an arthropod community. Ecology, 94(5): 1025–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutsinger G M, Strauss S Y, Rudgers J A. 2010. Genetic variation within a dominant shrub species determines plant species colonization in a coastal dune ecosystem. Ecology, 91(4): 1237–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutsinger G M. 2016. A community genetics perspective: opportunities for the coming decade. New Phytologist, 210(1): 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dia M, Wehner T C, Hassell R, et al. 2016. Genotype×environment interaction and stability analysis for watermelon fruit yield in the United States. Crop Science, 56(4): 1645–1661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draghi J A, Whitlock M C. 2012. Phenotypic plasticity facilitates mutational variance, genetic variance, and evolvability along the major axis of environmental variation. Evolution, 66(9): 2891–2902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland E K, Emery N C, Mercer K L, et al. 2017. Evolution of plant materials for ecological restoration: insights from the applied and basic literature. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(1): 102–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghalambor C K, McKay J K, Carroll S P, et al. 2007. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Functional Ecology, 21(3): 394–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson D J, Major C, Jones D, et al. 2014. Genetic sorting of subordinate species in grassland modulated by intraspecific variation in dominant species. PloS ONE, 9(3): e91511, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallsson L R, Björklund M. 2012. Selection in a fluctuating environment leads to decreased genetic variation and facilitates the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25(7): 1275–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann A A, Merilä J. 1999. Heritable variation and evolution under favourable and unfavourable conditions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14 (3): 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes A R, Inouye B D, Johnson M T, et al. 2008. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecology Letters, 11(6): 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft N J B, Crutsinger G M, Forrestel E J, et al. 2014. Functional trait differences and the outcome of community assembly: an experimental test with vernal pool annual plants. Oikos, 123(11): 1391–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z P, Li X F, Li H J, et al. 2007. The genetic diversity of perennial Leymus chinensis originating from China. Grass and Forage Science, 62 (1): 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 548–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manaa A, Ahmed H B, Valot B, et al. 2011. Salt and genotype impact on plant physiology and root proteome variations in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(8): 2797–2813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach G G, Osenberg C W, Wainwright P C. 1999. Variation in feeding morphology between pumpkinseed populations: Phenotypic plasticity or evolution? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 1(1): 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris G P, Hu Z B, Grabowski P P, et al. 2016. Genotypic diversity effects on biomass production in native perennial bioenergy cropping systems. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 8(5): 1000–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicotra A B, Atkin O K, Bonser S P, et al. 2010. Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science, 15(12): 684–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M. 2005. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9): 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prieto I, Violle C, Barre P, et al. 2015. Complementary effects of species and genetic diversity on productivity and stability of sown grasslands. Nature Plants, 1(4): 15033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu H, Huang S, Zhang Y. 1996. Flora Peipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Tomus 42(2). Beijing: Science Press, 133–147. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmela M J, Greenham K, Lou P, et al. 2016. Variation in circadian rhythms is maintained among and within populations in Boechera stricta. Plant, Cell & Environment, 39(6): 1293–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw E J, Kakuda Y, Rajcan I. 2016. Effect of genotype, environment, and genotype×environment interaction on tocopherol accumulation in soybean seed. Crop Science, 56(1): 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J F, Ren H Q, Xin X J, et al. 2015. Leymus chinensis genotypic diversity increase the response of population to disturbance. Acta Ecologia Sinica, 35(23): 7682–7689. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M D, Hoffman A M, Avolio M L. 2016. Gene expression patterns of two dominant tallgrass prairie species differ in response to warming and altered precipitation. Scientific Reports, 6: 25522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treplin M, Pennings S C, Zimmer M. 2013. Decomposition of leaf litter in a U.S. saltmarsh is driven by dominant species, not species complementarity. Wetlands, 33(1): 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y S, Zhao L M, Wang H, et al. 2005. Molecular genetic variation in a clonal plant population of Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 47(9): 1055–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z W, Li L H, Han X G, et al. 2004. Do rhizome severing and shoot defoliation affect clonal growth of Leymus chinensis at ramet population level? Acta Oecologica, 26(3): 255–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S X, Shu Q Y, Liu G S. 2006. Genetic relationship in ecotypes of Leymus chinensis revealed by polymorphism of amplified DNA fragment lengths. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 53(5): 678–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z Z, Zhou G S. 2006. Combined effects of water stress and high temperature on photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism and lipid peroxidation of a perennial grass Leymus chinensis. Planta, 224(5): 1080–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Shen J F, Zhao N X, et al. 2017. Phenotypic plasticity and genetic differentiation of quantitative traits in genotypes of Leymus chinensis. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 41(3): 359–368. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0500706), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31570427, 31770505), and the China Scholarship Council (201606205032). We are grateful to Dr. Pella BRINKMAN and Dr. RUAN Weibin for helpful suggestions on improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, College of Life Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China

    Xue Yang, Junpeng Li, Tingting Zhao, Lidong Mo, Jianli Zhang, Huiqin Ren, Nianxi Zhao & Yubao Gao

Authors
  1. Xue Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junpeng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tingting Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lidong Mo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianli Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Huiqin Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nianxi Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yubao Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nianxi Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, X., Li, J., Zhao, T. et al. Variation and heritability of morphological and physiological traits among Leymus chinensis genotypes under different environmental conditions. J. Arid Land 11, 66–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-018-0018-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-018-0018-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation