Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance of different drought indices for agriculture drought in the North China Plain

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Palmer drought severity index (PDSI), standardized precipitation index (SPI), and standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) are used worldwide for drought assessment and monitoring. However, substantial differences exist in the performance for agricultural drought among these indices and among regions. Here, we performed statistical assessments to compare the strengths of different drought indices for agricultural drought in the North China Plain. Small differences were detected in the comparative performances of SPI and SPEI that were smaller at the long-term scale than those at the short-term scale. The correlation between SPI/SPEI and PDSI considerably increased from 1- to 12-month lags, and a slight decreasing trend was exhibited during 12- and 24-month lags, indicating a 12-month scale in the PDSI, whereas the SPI was strongly correlated with the SPEI at 1- to 24-month lags. Interestingly, the correlation between the trend of temperature and the mean absolute error and its correlation coefficient both suggested stronger relationships between SPI and the SPEI in areas of rapid climate warming. In addition, the yield–drought correlations tended to be higher for the SPI and SPEI than that for the PDSI at the station scale, whereas small differences were detected between the SPI and SPEI in the performance on agricultural systems. However, large differences in the influence of drought conditions on the yields of winter wheat and summer maize were evident among various indices during the crop-growing season. Our findings suggested that multi-indices in drought monitoring are needed in order to acquire robust conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AghaKouchak A, Farahmand A, Melton F S, et al. 2015. Remote sensing of drought: progress, challenges and opportunities. Reviews of Geophysics, 53(2): 452–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alley W M. 1984. The palmer drought severity index: limitations and assumptions. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 23(7): 1100–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai A G. 2011. Drought under global warming: a review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(1): 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai A G. 2013. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nature Climate Change, 3(1): 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drobyshev I, Niklasson M, Linderholm H W. 2012. Forest fire activity in Sweden: climatic controls and geographical patterns in 20th century. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 154–155: 174–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du L T, Tian Q J, Yu T, et al. 2013. A comprehensive drought monitoring method integrating MODIS and TRMM data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 23: 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao C, Zhang J H, Yao F M. 2015. Combination of multi-sensor remote sensing data for drought monitoring over Southwest China. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 35: 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao Z C, Singh V P. 2015. Drought characterization from a multivariate perspective: a review. Journal of Hydrology, 527: 668–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim R R Jr. 2002. A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(8): 1149–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu S, Mo X G, Lin Z H, et al. 2010. Emergy assessment of a wheat-maize rotation system with different water assignments in the North China Plain. Environmental Management, 46(4): 643–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y N. 2013. Drought risk assessment of winter wheat and summer maize rotation planting region in North China Plain. PhD Dissertation. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang R G, Xie J C, He H L, et al. 2015. Use of four drought indices for evaluating drought characteristics under climate change in Shaanxi, China: 1951–2012. Natural Hazards, 75(3): 2885–2903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempes C P, Myers O B, Breshears D D, et al. 2008. Comparing response of Pinus edulis tree-ring growth to five alternate moisture indices using historic meteorological data. Journal of Arid Environments, 72(4): 350–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavromatis T. 2007. Drought index evaluation for assessing future wheat production in Greece. International Journal of Climatology, 27(7): 911–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavromatis T. 2010. Use of drought indices in climate change impact assessment studies: an application to Greece. International Journal of Climatology, 30(9): 1336–1348, doi: 10.1002/joc.1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee T B, Doesken N J, Kleist J. 1993. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology. Anaheim, CA: American Meteorological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra A K, Singh V P. 2010. A review of drought concepts. Journal of Hydrology, 391(1–2): 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu Q Z, Zhao M S, Kimball J S, et al. 2013. A remotely sensed global terrestrial drought severity index. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 94(1): 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichol J E, Abbas S. 2015. Integration of remote sensing datasets for local scale assessment and prediction of drought. Science of the Total Environment, 505: 503–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer W C. 1965. Meteorological Drought. Washington: US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potop V. 2011. Evolution of drought severity and its impact on corn in the Republic of Moldova. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 105(3–4): 469–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potopová V, Štěpánek P, Možný M, et al. 2015. Performance of the standardised precipitation evapotranspiration index at various lags for agricultural drought risk assessment in the Czech Republic. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 202: 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiring S M, Ganesh S. 2010. Evaluating the utility of the Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) for monitoring meteorological drought in Texas. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150(3): 330–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente-Serrano S M, Beguería S, López-Moreno J I. 2010. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Journal of Climate, 23(7): 1696–1718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente-Serrano S M, Begueria S, Lorenzo-Lacruz J, et al. 2012. Performance of drought indices for ecological, agricultural, and hydrological applications. Earth Interactions, 16(10): 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegren S K. 2011. Food security and Russia's 2010 drought. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 52(1): 140–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells N, Goddard S, Hayes M J. 2004. A self-calibrating palmer drought severity index. Journal of Climate, 17(12): 2335–2351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite D A, Glantz M H. 1985. Understanding: the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Water International, 10(3): 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Li M X, Zheng Z Y, et al. 2017. Regional applicability of seven meteorological drought indices in China. Science China Earth Sciences, 60(4): 745–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai J Q, Su B D, Krysanova V, et al. 2010. Spatial variation and trend in PDSI and SPI indices and their relation to streamflow in 10 large regions of China. Journal of Climate, 23(3): 649–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (GK201703049) and the Major Project of High Resolution Earth Observation System, China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, 710119, China

    Xianfeng Liu, Jianjun Bai & Shuangshuang Li

  2. Institute of Remote Sensing Science and Engineering, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

    Xiufang Zhu & Yaozhong Pan

Authors
  1. Xianfeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiufang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yaozhong Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jianjun Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shuangshuang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianfeng Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Zhu, X., Pan, Y. et al. Performance of different drought indices for agriculture drought in the North China Plain. J. Arid Land 10, 507–516 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-018-0005-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-018-0005-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation