Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of meteorological drought indices based on AgMERRA precipitation data and station-observed precipitation data

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Meteorological drought is a natural hazard that can occur under all climatic regimes. Monitoring the drought is a vital and important part of predicting and analyzing drought impacts. Because no single index can represent all facets of meteorological drought, we took a multi-index approach for drought monitoring in this study. We assessed the ability of eight precipitation-based drought indices (SPI (Standardized Precipitation Index), PNI (Percent of Normal Index), DI (Deciles index), EDI (Effective drought index), CZI (China-Z index), MCZI (Modified CZI), RAI (Rainfall Anomaly Index), and ZSI (Z-score Index)) calculated from the station-observed precipitation data and the AgMERRA gridded precipitation data to assess historical drought events during the period 1987–2010 for the Kashafrood Basin of Iran. We also presented the Degree of Dryness Index (DDI) for comparing the intensities of different drought categories in each year of the study period (1987–2010). In general, the correlations among drought indices calculated from the AgMERRA precipitation data were higher than those derived from the station-observed precipitation data. All indices indicated the most severe droughts for the study period occurred in 2001 and 2008. Regardless of data input source, SPI, PNI, and DI were highly inter-correlated (R2=0.99). Furthermore, the higher correlations (R2=0.99) were also found between CZI and MCZI, and between ZSI and RAI. All indices were able to track drought intensity, but EDI and RAI showed higher DDI values compared with the other indices. Based on the strong correlation among drought indices derived from the AgMERRA precipitation data and from the station-observed precipitation data, we suggest that the AgMERRA precipitation data can be accepted to fill the gaps existed in the station-observed precipitation data in future studies in Iran. In addition, if tested by station-observed precipitation data, the AgMERRA precipitation data may be used for the data-lacking areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alley W M. 1984. The Palmer drought severity index: limitations and assumptions. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 23(7): 1100–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asefjah B, Fanian F, Feizi Z, et al. 2014. Meteorological drought monitoring using several drought indices (case study: Salt Lake Basin in Iran). Desert, 19(2): 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannayan M, Lashkari A, Zare H, et al. 2015. Applicability of AgMERRA forcing dataset to fill gaps in historical in-situ meteorological data. In: American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2015. Abstract #GC13D-1180. 2015AGUFMGC13D1180B. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bărbulescu A, Deguenon J. 2014. Models for trend of precipitation in Dobrudja. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 13(4): 873–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byun H R, Wilhite D A. 1999. Objective quantification of drought severity and duration. Journal of Climate, 12(9): 2747–2756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceglar A, Toreti A, Balsamo G, et al. 2017. Precipitation over Monsoon Asia: a comparison of reanalyses and observations. Journal of Climate, 30(2): 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang T J, Kleopa X A. 1991. A proposed method for drought monitoring. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 27(2): 275–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deo R C. 2011. On meteorological droughts in tropical Pacific Islands: time-series analysis of observed rainfall using Fiji as a case study. Meteorological Applications, 18(2): 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deo R C, Byun H R, Adamowski J F, et al. 2017. Application of effective drought index for quantification of meteorological drought events: a case study in Australia. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 128(1–2): 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan S, Berktay A, Singh V P. 2012. Comparison of multi-monthly rainfall-based drought severity indices, with application to semi-arid Konya closed basin, Turkey. Journal of Hydrology, 470–471: 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards D C, McKee T B. 1997. Characteristics of 20th century drought in the United States at multiple time scales. In: Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Colorado State University. Atmospheric Science Paper No. 634, Climatology Report No.97-2. Fort Collins, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalante-Sandoval C, Nuñez-Garcia P. 2017. Meteorological drought features in northern and northwestern parts of Mexico under different climate change scenarios. Journal of Arid Land, 9(1): 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2008. Statistics. [2010-08-12]. http://faostat.fao.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs W, Maher J. 1967. Rainfall Deciles as Drought Indicators. Melbourne: Bureau of Meteorology, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes M J, Svoboda M D, Wilhite D A, et al. 1999. Monitoring the 1996 drought using the standardized precipitation index. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 80(3): 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes M J. 2006. Drought Indices. Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Doi: 10.1002/0471743984.vse8593. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0471743984.vse8593/full.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim Jr R R. 2002. A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(3): 1149–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 895–896.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ju X S, Yang X W, Chen L J, et al. 1997. Research on determination of station indexes and division of regional flood/drought grades in China. Quarterly Journal of Applied Meteorology, 8(1): 26–33. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabulut M. 2015. Drought analysis in Antakya-Kahramanmaraş Graben, Turkey. Journal of Arid Land, 7(6): 741–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyantash J, Dracup J. 2002. The quantification of drought: an evaluation of drought indices. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(8): 1167–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D W, Byun H R, Choi K S. 2009. Evaluation, modification, and application of the Effective Drought Index to 200-Year drought climatology of Seoul, Korea. Journal of Hydrology, 378(1–2): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Tsunekawa A, Tsubo M. 2014. Index-based assessment of agricultural drought in a semi-arid region of Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Arid Land, 6(1): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Yao N, Sahin S, et al. 2017. Spatiotemporal variability of four precipitation-based drought indices in Xinjiang, China. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 129(3–4): 1017–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee T B, Doesken N J, Kleist J. 1993. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology. Anaheim, CA: American Meteorological Society, 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee T B, Doesken N J, Kleist J. 1995. Drought monitoring with Multiple Time scales. In: Proceeding of the 9th Conference on Applied Climatology. Dallas, TX: American Meteorological Society, 233–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture (Iran). 2009. Crop statistics. [2009-04-03]. http://dpe.agri-jahad.ir/portal/File/ShowFile.aspx? ID=bd799699-4e89-437f-8a30-5e15a014d332. (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morid S, Smakhtin V, Moghaddasi M. 2006. Comparison of seven meteorological indices for drought monitoring in Iran. International Journal of Climatology, 26(7): 971–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potop V, Boroneanţ C, Možný M, et al. 2014. Observed spatiotemporal characteristics of drought on various time scales over the Czech Republic. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 115(3–4): 563–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiring S M. 2009. Monitoring drought: an evaluation of meteorological drought indices. Geography Compass, 3(1): 64–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rienecker M M, Suarez M J, Gelaro R, et al. 2011. MERRA: NASA’s modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications. Journal of Climate, 24(14): 3624–3648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruane A C, Goldberg R, Chryssanthacopoulos J. 2015. Climate forcing datasets for agricultural modeling: merged products for gap-filling and historical climate series estimation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 200: 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabfar A, Eitzinger J. 2013. Spatio-temporal analysis of droughts in semi-arid regions by using meteorological drought indices. Atmosphere, 4(2): 94–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smakhtin V U, Hughes D A. 2007. Automated estimation and analyses of meteorological drought characteristics from monthly rainfall data. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(6): 880–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. 2010. Iran: crop progress report. FAS—Office of Global Analysis (OGA), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). International Operational Agriculture Monitoring Program. [2009-12-28]. https://www.pecad.fas.usda.gov/pdfs/Iran/Iran_December_28_2009.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • White J W, Hoogenboom G, Stackhouse Jr P W, et al. 2008. Evaluation of NASA satellite- and assimilation model-derived long-term daily temperature data over the continental US. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(10): 1574–1584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willeke G, Hosking J R M, Wallis J R, et al. 1994. The national drought atlas. In: Institute for Water Resources Report 94-NDS-4. U.S Army Corp of Engineers, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norfolk, VA. WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2013. High-level Meeting on National Drought Policy. Geneva: International Conference Center (CICG). [2013-03-11]. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/wcp/agm/meetings/hmndp13/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Hayes M J, Weiss A, et al. 2001. An evaluation of the Standardized Precipitation Index, the China-Z Index and the statistical Z-Score. International Journal of Climatology, 21(6): 745–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu G, Sauchyn D, Li Y F. 2013. Drought changes and the mechanism analysis for the North American Prairie. Journal of Arid Land, 5(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Carol WILKERSON (Independent Consultant, Gainesville, Florida, USA) and K. Grace CRUMMER (Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, University of Florida, USA) for editing and improving the language of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Alizadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salehnia, N., Alizadeh, A., Sanaeinejad, H. et al. Estimation of meteorological drought indices based on AgMERRA precipitation data and station-observed precipitation data. J. Arid Land 9, 797–809 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-017-0070-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-017-0070-y

Keywords

Navigation