Skip to main content

A method to estimate aquifer artificial recharge from a hill dam in Tunisia

Abstract

In arid and semi-arid areas, artificial recharge is a key technology in groundwater resources management, and a reliable estimate of artificial recharge is necessary to its sustainable development. Several methods are available to estimate the artificial recharge; however, most of them require field data or model parameters, thus limiting their applications. To overcome this limitation, we presented an analytical method to estimate the artificial recharge through monitoring the water release by piezometer and analysing the controlling factors of the artificial recharge from a hill dam in Tunisia. A total of 97 measurements of water flow in the streambed recorded from 4 gauging stations were analysed. Results indicated that the average infiltration velocity ranged from 0.043 to 0.127 m/d and the infiltration index varied from 7.6 to 11.8 L/(s•km). Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis shows that the infiltration index, the stream gradient, the thickness of unsaturated zone, the number of infiltration pond, the stream geometry, and the water flow rate were found to be the main factors in determining the infiltration. The high correlation coefficients (0.908 for the number of infiltration pond and 0.999 for the stream geometry) mean that the number of infiltration pond and the stream geometry are the most influential factors. Time variations of groundwater level were used to analyze the recharge effects on the piezometry of aquifer. The analysis showed that during the artificial recharge, the water table increased at a rate of 5 mm/d and that the increase was limited to the area surrounding the recharge site. Based on the results of the study, building infiltration ponds along streambed and improving the potential of rainwater harvesting over the study area are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Alaoui A, Eugster W. 2004. Dual-porosity modeling of groundwater recharge: testing a quick calibration using in situ moisture measurements, Areuse River Delta, Switzerland. Hydrogeology Journal, 12(4): 464–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison G B, Gee G W, Tyler S W. 1994. Vadose-zone techniques for estimating groundwater recharge in arid and semiarid regions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58(1): 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreo B, Vías J, Durán J J, et al. 2008. Methodology for groundwater recharge assessment in carbonate aquifers: application to pilot sites in southern Spain. Hydrogeology Journal, 16(5): 911–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bel Hadj Salem S, Chkir N, Zouari K, et al. 2012. Natural and artificial recharge investigation in the Zéroud Basin, Central Tunisia: impact of Sidi Saad Dam storage. Environmental Earth Sciences, 66(4): 1099–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besbes M, Delhomme J P, De Marsily G. 1978. Estimating recharge from ephemeral streams in arid regions: a case study at Kairouan, Tunisia. Water Resources Research, 14(2): 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasch K W, Ferré T P A, Vrugt J A. 2010. Environmental controls on drainage behavior of an ephemeral stream. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24(7): 1077–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulain N, Cappelaere B, Séguis L, et al. 2009. Water balance and vegetation change in the Sahel: a case study at the watershed scale with an eco-hydrological model. Journal of Arid Environments, 73(12): 1125–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candela L, Elorza F J, Jiménez-Martínez J, et al. 2012. Global change and agricultural management options for groundwater sustainability. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 86: 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson M A, Lohse K A, McIntosh J C, et al. 2011. Impacts of urbanization on groundwater quality and recharge in a semi-arid alluvial basin. Journal of Hydrology, 409(1–2): 196–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chartier M P, Rostagno C M, Pazos G E. 2011. Effects of soil degradation on infiltration rates in grazed semiarid rangelands of northeastern Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments, 75(7): 656–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook P G. 2013. Estimating groundwater discharge to rivers from river chemistry surveys. Hydrological Processes, 27(25): 3694–3707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahan O, Tatarsky B, Enzel Y, et al. 2008. Dynamics of flood water infiltration and ground water recharge in hyperarid desert. Ground Water, 46(3): 450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descroix L, Laurent J P, Vauclin M, et al. 2012. Experimental evidence of deep infiltration under sandy flats and gullies in the Sahel. Journal of Hydrology, 424–425: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogramaci S, Firmani G, Hedley P, et al. 2015. Evaluating recharge to an ephemeral dryland stream using a hydraulic model and water, chloride and isotope mass balance. Journal of Hydrology, 521: 520–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellows C S, Valett H M, Dahm C N. 2001. Whole-stream metabolism in two montane streams: contribution of the hyporheic zone. Limnology and Oceanography, 46(3): 523–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint A L, Flint L E, Kwicklis E M, et al. 2002. Estimating recharge at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA: comparison of methods. Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1): 180–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint A L, Ellett K M. 2004. The role of the unsaturated zone in artificial recharge at San Gorgonio Pass, California. Vadose Zone Journal, 3(3): 763–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton S A. 2012. Technical report great artesian basin resource assessment. In: Department of Land Resource Management. Report 14/2012A. Darwin, UK.

  • General Water Resources Direction (DGRE). 1995. Annual report of the exploitation and piezometry of deep aquifers, Ministry of Agriculture and Hydraulic Resources, Tunis, Tunisia. (in French)

  • Goodrich D C, Williams D G, Unkrich C L, et al. 2004. Comparison of methods to estimate ephemeral channel recharge, Walnut Gulch, San Pedro River basin, Arizona. In: Hogan J F, Phillips F M, Scanlon B R. Groundwater Recharge in a Desert Environment: The Southwestern United States. Washington, DC: AGU, 77–99.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greene E A. 1997. Tracing recharge from sinking streams over spatial dimensions of kilometers in a karst aquifer. Ground Water, 35(5): 898–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harte P T, Kiah R G. 2009. Measured river leakages using conventional streamflow techniques: the case of Souhegan River, New Hampshire, USA. Hydrogeology Journal, 17(2): 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey J W, Wagner B J, Bencala K E. 1996. Evaluating the reliability of the stream tracer approach to characterize stream-subsurface water exchange. Water Resources Research, 32(8): 2441–2451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy R W, Cook P G. 2002. Using groundwater levels to estimate recharge. Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1): 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn E. 1998. Solute exchange between river water and groundwater in headwater environments. In: Hydrology, Water Resources and Ecology in Headwaters: Proceedings of the HeadWater’98 Conference held at Meran/Merano, Italy, April 1998. Meran/Merano, Italy: IAHS Publication, 248: 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington J L, Niswonger R G. 2012. Role of surface-water and groundwater interactions on projected summertime streamflow in snow dominated regions: an integrated modeling approach. Water Resources Research, 48(11): W11524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Martínez J, Longuevergne L, Le Borgne T, et al. 2013. Temporal and spatial scaling of hydraulic response to recharge in fractured aquifers: insights from a frequency domain analysis. Water Resources Research, 49(5): 3007–3023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbus E, Reinstorf F, Schirmer M. 2006. Measuring methods for groundwater–surface water interactions: a review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10: 873–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keese K E, Scanlon B R, Reedy R C. 2005. Assessing controls on diffuse groundwater recharge using unsaturated flow modeling. Water Resources Research, 41(6): W06010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch J C, McKnight D M, Neupauer R M. 2011. Simulating unsteady flow, anabranching, and hyporheic dynamics in a glacial meltwater stream using a coupled surface water routing and groundwater flow model. Water Resources Research, 47(5): W05530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konkul J, Rojborwornwittaya W, Chotpantarat S. 2014. Hydrogeologic characteristics and groundwater potentiality mapping using potential surface analysis in the Huay Sai area, Phetchaburi province, Thailand. Geosciences Journal, 18(1): 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Kumari K, Singh U K, et al. 2009. Hydrogeochemical processes in the groundwater environment of Muktsar, Punjab: conventional graphical and multivariate statistical approach. Environmental Geology, 57(4): 873–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kung W J, Yeh H F, Lin H I, et al. 2013. An approach to evaluate groundwater recharge from streamflow and groundwater records. Geosciences Journal, 17(3): 353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange J. 2005. Dynamics of transmission losses in a large arid stream channel. Journal of Hydrology, 306(1–4): 112–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leduc C, Favreau G, Shroeter P. 2001. Long term rise in a Sahelian water table: the Continental Terminal in South West Niger. Journal of Hydrology, 243 (1–2): 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee L J E, Lawrence D S L, Price M. 2006. Analysis of water-level response to rainfall and implications for recharge pathways in the Chalk aquifer, SE England. Journal of Hydrology, 330(3–4): 604–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B X, Shao M A. 2016. Response of soil water dynamics to precipitation years under different vegetation types on the northern Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Land, 8(1): 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum J L, Cook P G, Berhane D, et al. 2012. Quantifying groundwater flows to streams using differential flow gaugings and water chemistry. Journal of Hydrology, 416–417: 118–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald M G, Harbaugh A W. 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. In: U.S. Geological Survey. Techniques of Water-Resources Investigation, Book 6 Chapter A1, U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report, 83–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Meteorology (NIM). 2006. Tables of Monthly Climatic Data. Tunisia: Mograne Station. (in French)

  • Nazoumou Y, Besbes M. 2000. Use of a reservoir model to simulate artificial groundwater recharge. Journal of Water Science, 13(4): 379–404. (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman S P. 1975. Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response. Water Resources Research, 11(2): 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oude Essink G H P. 1998. MOC3D adapted to simulate 3D density-dependent groundwater flow. In: Proceedings of the MODFLOW’98 Conference. Golden, Colorado, USA, 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park C, Seo J, Lee J, et al. 2014. A distributed water balance approach to groundwater recharge estimation for Jeju Volcanic Island, Korea. Geosciences Journal, 18(2): 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton K R. 2005. Estimating recharge for British aquifers. Water and Environment Journal, 19(2): 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCET. 2002. Project of Water Resources Study in South-eastern districts of Zaghouan City–The Nadhour-Saouafsyncline. In: Report of General Water Resources Direction, Ministry of Agriculture and Hydraulic Resources. Tunis, Tunisia, 1–190. (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scibek J, Allen D M. 2006. Modeled impacts of predicted climate change on recharge and groundwater levels. Water Resources Research, 42(11): W11405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaban A, Khawlie M, Abdallah C. 2006. Use of remote sensing and GIS to determine recharge potential zone: the case of Occidental Lebanon. Hydrogeology Journal, 14(4): 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanafield M, Cook P G. 2014. Transmission losses, infiltration and groundwater recharge through ephemeral and intermittent streambeds: a review of applied methods. Journal of Hydrology, 511: 518–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiraki K, Shinomiya Y, Shibano H. 2006. Numerical experiments of watershed-scale soil water movement and bedrock infiltration using a physical three-dimensional simulation model. Journal of Forest Research, 11(6): 439–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šimunek J, Van Genuchten M T, Šejna M. 2005. The HYDRUS-1D software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media. Riverside, California: University of California Riverside, 1–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sophocleous M. 2002. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1): 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorman A U, Abdulrazzak M J. 1993. Infiltration-recharge through wadi beds in arid regions. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 38(3): 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triki I, Trabelsi N, Hentati I, et al. 2014. Groundwater levels time series sensitivity to pluviometry and air temperature: a geostatistical approach to Sfax region, Tunisia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(3): 1593–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu Y C, Ting C S, Tsai H T, et al. 2011. Dynamic analysis of the infiltration rate of artificial recharge of groundwater: a case study of Wanglong Lake, Pingtung, Taiwan. Environmental Earth Sciences, 63(1): 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker G R, Zhang L, Ellis T W, et al. 2002. Estimating impacts of changed land use on recharge: review of modelling and other approaches appropriate for management of dryland salinity. Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1): 68–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh G T, Fang Y L, Zhang F, et al. 2010. Numerical modeling of coupled fluid flow and thermal and reactive biogeochemical transport in porous and fractured media. Computational Geosciences, 14(1): 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh H F, Lee C H, Hsu K C, et al. 2009. GIS for the assessment of the groundwater recharge potential zone. Environmental Geology, 58(1): 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zammouri M, Feki H. 2005. Managing releases from small upland reservoirs for downstream recharge in semi-arid basins (Northeast of Tunisia). Journal of Hydrology, 314(1–4): 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are immensely grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editorial team of the Journal of Arid Land for their comments and suggestions that enhanced the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zouheira Ibn Ali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibn Ali, Z., Triki, I., Lajili-Ghezal, L. et al. A method to estimate aquifer artificial recharge from a hill dam in Tunisia. J. Arid Land 9, 244–255 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-017-0002-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-017-0002-x

Keywords

  • arid zone
  • water shortage
  • dam water release
  • infiltration index
  • piezometry