Journal of Arid Land

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 453–461 | Cite as

Identity and distribution of weedy Pedicularis kansuensis Maxim. (Orobanchaceae) in Tianshan Mountains of Xinjiang: morphological, anatomical and molecular evidence

  • Xiaolin Sui
  • Patrick Kuss
  • Wenjun Li
  • Meiqing Yang
  • Kaiyun Guan
  • Airong LiEmail author


Weedy plants affect the biodiversity and ecosystem function as well as the crop and fodder plant production. However, adequate management requires detailed knowledge of the taxonomic identity of these plants. Here, we focused on a hemiparasitic Pedicularis species (Orobanchaceae), which occurs at high densities and results in significant biomass reductions in forage grasses in Bayanbulak Grassland of Xinjiang. The identity of this target species is not clear, with conflicting reports in publications and in herbarium collections. Hence, clear and management-relevant information on demography and reproductive ecology is difficult to be obtained from the literature. Therefore, we analyzed field and archival materials collected from Xinjiang in order to clarify the identity and distribution of the target species. Morphological analyses suggested that the populations at Bayanbulak Grassland should be Pedicularis kansuensis Maxim. rather than P. verticillata L. which has been accepted in the available literature. Phylogenetic analysis with a combination of three barcodes (matK, rbcL and trnH-psbA) uniting a clade of P. kansuensis and individuals from Bayanbulak Grassland populations with 100% bootstrap support, confirmed the target species to be P. kansuensis. Anatomical investigations and field observations showed that the target species is an annual or biennial herb, which also fits with the life cycle as P. kansuensis. Based on archive material and field observations, we verified that the distribution of P. kansuensis is mainly concentrated in the Tianshan Mountains of Xinjiang.


DNA barcode herb-chronology morphological characters root hemiparasite 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ameloot E, Hermy M, Verheyen K. 2006. Rhinanthus: An effective tool in reducing biomass of road verges? An experiment along two motorways. Belgian Journal of Botany, 139(2): 173–187.Google Scholar
  2. Bao G S, Wang H S. 2011. Allelopathic effects of Pedicularis kansuensis Maxim. on several graminaceous grass species on alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 33(2): 88–94. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Breckle S W, Rafiqpoor M D. 2010. Field Guide Afghanistan: Flora and Vegetation. Bonn: Scientia Bonnensis.Google Scholar
  4. Bullock J M, Pywell R F. 2005. RRhinanthus minorhinanthus: a tool for restoring diverse grassland?. Folia Geobotanica, 40(2–3): 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron D D, White A, Antonovics J. 2009. Parasite-grass-forb interactions and rock-paper-scissor dynamics: predicting the effects of the parasitic plant Rhinanthus minor on host plant communities. Journal of Ecology, 97(6): 1311–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caswell H. 2001. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Cissoko M, Boisnard A, Rodenburg J, et al. 2011. New rice for Africa (NERICA) cultivars exhibit different levels of post-attachment resistance against the parasitic weeds Striga hermonthica and Striga asiatica. New Phytologist, 192(4): 952–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Czerepanov S K. 1995. Vascular Plants of Russia and Adjacent States (the former USSR). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Davies D M, Graves J D, Elias C O, et al. 1997. The impact of Rhinanthus spp. on sward productivity and composition: Implications for the restoration of species-rich grasslands. Biological Conservation, 82(1): 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doyle J J, Doyle J L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19: 11–15.Google Scholar
  11. Grubov V I, Ivanina L I, Tscherneva O V. 2002. Plants of Central Asia: Plant Collection from China and Mongolia. vol. 5: Verbenaceae–Scrophulariaceae. Enfield (NH): Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Guan Y P. 2007. Countermeasures of protect and to continued development for the Bayinbuluk Grasslands. Grass-feeding Livestock, (3): 7–9. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Hautier Y, Hector A, Yojtech E, et al. 2010. Modelling the growth of parasitic plants. Journal of Ecology, 98(4): 857–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Husain T, Garg A, Agnihotri P. 2010. Genus Pedicularis L. (Scrophulariaceae) in India: A Revisionary Study. Dehra Dun: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.Google Scholar
  15. Irving L J, Cameron D D. 2009. Chapter 3. You are what you eat: interactions between root parasitic plants and their hosts. Advances in Botanical Research, 50: 87–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, et al. 2012. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics, 28(12): 1647–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kosachev P A. 2010. Synopsis of the families Scrophulariaceae Juss. and Pediculariaceae Juss. of Altai Mountain Country. Turczaninowia, 13(1): 19–102. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  18. Liu Y Y, Hu Y K, Yu J M, et al. 2008. Study on harmfulness of Pedicularis myriophylla and its control measures. Arid Zone Research, 25(6): 778–782. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Magda D, Duru M, Theau J P. 2004. Defining management rules for grasslands using weed demographic characteristics. Weed Science, 52(3): 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nasir E, Ali S I. 1980. Flora of Pakistan. St. Louis: University of Karachi and Missouri Botanical Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pan X L, Nurbay. 2004. Pedicularis L. In: Flora Xinjiangensis, Vol. 4. Urumqi: Xinjiang Science and Technology Publishing House, 407–422. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  22. Parker C. 2012. Parasitic weeds: A world challenge. Weed Science, 60(2): 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pavlov N V. 1965. Flora Kazachstana, vol. 8. Alma-Ata: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk Kazachskoj SSR, 115–145. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  24. Phoenix G K, Press M C. 2005. Linking physiological traits to impacts on community structure and function: the role of root hemiparasitic Orobanchaceae (ex-Scrophulariaceae). Journal of Ecology, 93(1): 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schweingruber F H, Poschlod P. 2005. Growth rings in herbs and shrubs: life span, age determination and stem anatomy. Forest Snow and Landscape Research, 79(3): 195–415.Google Scholar
  26. Silvertown J, Charlesworth D. 2001. Introduction to Plant Population Biology (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  27. Song Z S. 2006. It is an urgent task to recovery & comprehensively manage the grassland ecology of Bayingbuluke. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 27(1): 21–25. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, et al. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30(12): 2725–2729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tsoong P C. 1963. Scrophulariaceae (Pars II). In: Tsoong P C. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinacae, vol. 68. Beijing: Science Press, 1–449. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  30. Vvedenskii A I. 1951. Flora of the Kirghiz SSR. Frunze: Academy of Sciences of the Kirghiz SSR. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  31. Wang W X, Sang G J, Li L. 2009. Study on the control techniques of poisons grass Pedicularis in Xinjiang Bayanbulak Prairie. Grass-Feeding Livestock, (2): 49–50. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  32. Williams A R. 2010. On sustaining the ecology and livestock industry of the Bayanbuluk Grasslands. Journal of Arid Land, 2(1): 57–63.Google Scholar
  33. Yamazaki T. 1988. A revision of the genus Pedicularis in Nepal. In: Ohba H, Malla S B. The Himalayan Plants, Volume 1. Tokyo: The University of Tokyo, Bulletin, 31: 91–161.Google Scholar
  34. Yang H B, Holmgren N H, Mill R R. 1998. Pedicularis L. In: Wu Z Y, Raven P H. Flora of China, vol. 18. Beijing, St. Louis: Science Press Beijing, Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 97–209.Google Scholar
  35. Yu W B, Huang P H, Ree R H, et al. 2011. DNA barcoding of Pedicularis L. (Orobanchaceae): evaluating four universal barcode loci in a large and hemiparasitic genus. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 49(5): 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer - Verlag GmbH 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaolin Sui
    • 1
  • Patrick Kuss
    • 2
  • Wenjun Li
    • 3
    • 4
  • Meiqing Yang
    • 5
  • Kaiyun Guan
    • 1
    • 3
  • Airong Li
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Yunnan Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Systematic BotanyUniversity of ZürichZürichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresource in Arid Land, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and GeographyChinese Academy of SciencesUrumqiChina
  4. 4.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  5. 5.World Agroforestry CentreEast and Central Asia RegionKunmingChina

Personalised recommendations