Advertisement

Journal of Arid Land

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 241–253 | Cite as

Diversity of endophytes across the soil-plant continuum for Atriplex spp. in arid environments

  • Mohammad E. Tahtamouni
  • Sa’eb Khresat
  • Mary Lucero
  • Jesus Sigala
  • Adrian UncEmail author
Article

Abstract

Endophytes are hypothesized to be transferred across the soil-plant continuum, suggesting both the transfers of endophytes from environment to plant and from plant to soil. To verify this hypothesis and to assess the role of locality, we evaluated the similarity of microbial communities commonly found both in soils and endophytic communities in three arid regions, i.e. the Jornada LTER (Long Term Ecological Research) site in New Mexico, USA, and the research station of Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST) and Khanasri research station in Badia region of Jordan. Rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soils, leaves and seeds of Atriplex spp. were sampled. Diversity and distribution of bacteria and fungi across the soil-plant continuums were assessed by tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing and sequence alignment. Of the total bacterial OTUs (operational taxonomic units), 0.17% in Khanasri research station, 0.16% in research station of JUST, and 0.42% in Jornada LTER site were commonly found across all the plant and soil compartments. The same was true for fungi in two regions, i.e. 1.56% in research station of JUST and 0.86% in Jornada LTER site. However, in Khanasri research station, 12.08% of total fungi OTUs were found in at least one soil compartment and one plant compartment. Putative Arthrobacter, Sporosarcina, Cladosporium and members of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were found across all the soil-plant continuums. Ascomycota, mainly including Didymellaceae, Pleosporaceae and Davidiellaceae were present across all the soil-plant continuums. Microbial communities in two regions of Jordan were similar to each other, but both of them were different from the Jornada LTER site of USA. SIMPER (similarity percentage) analysis of bacterial and fungal taxa for both soil and endophyte communities revealed that dissimilarities of two bacterial genera (Arthrobacter and Sporosarcina) and two fungal genera (Cladosporium and Alternaria) are very high, so they play key roles in the soil-plant continuums. A weighed Pearson correlation analysis for the specific bacterial OTUs in the soil-plant continuums only showed high similarity between the two regions of Jordan. However, fungal groups showed higher similarities among all regions. This research supports the hypothesis of continuity of certain bacterial and fungal communities across the soil-plant continuums, and also explores the influences of plant species and geographic specificity on diversity and distribution of bacteria and fungi.

Keywords

endophytes microbial diversities soil-plant continuum pyrosequencing Atriplex spp. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Bakri J T, Ajlouni M, Abu-Zanat M. 2008. Incorporating land use mapping and participation in Jordan: An approach to sustainable management of two mountainous areas. Mountain Research and Development, 28(1): 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alzweiri M, Al Sarhan A, Mansi K, et al. 2011. Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal herbs in Jordan, the Northern Badia region. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 137(1): 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assmus B, Hutzler P, Kirchhof G, et al. 1995. In situ localization of Azospirillum brasilense in the rhizosphere of wheat with fluorescently labeled, rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes and scanning confocal laser microscopy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61(3): 1013–1019.Google Scholar
  4. Bais H P, Weir T L, Perry L G, et al. 2006. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57: 233–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrow J R, Havstad K M, Hubstenberger J, et al. 1997. Seed-borne fungal endophytes on fourwing saltbush, Atriplex canescens. Arid Soil Research Rehabilitation, 11(4): 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrow J R, Osuna P. 2002. Phosphorus solubilization and uptake by dark septate fungi in fourwing saltbush, Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. Journal of Arid Environments, 51(3): 449–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrow J R, Osuna-Avila P, Reyes-Vera I. 2004. Fungal endophytes intrinsically associated with micropropagated plants regenerated from native Bouteloua eriopoda Torr. and Atriplex canescens (Pursh) NUTT. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 40(6): 608–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrow J, Lucero M, Reyes-Vera I, et al. 2008. Do symbiotic microbes have a role in regulating plant performance and response to stress? Communicative & Integrative Biology, 1(1): 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basilio A, González I, Vicente M F, et al. 2003. Patterns of antimicrobial activities from soil actinomycetes isolated under different conditions of pH and salinity. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 95(4): 814–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bulgarelli D, Schlaeppi K, Spaepen S, et al. 2013. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 64: 807–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burdman S, Jurkevitch E, Schwartsburd B, et al. 1999. Involvement of outer-membrane proteins in the aggregation of Azospirillum brasilense. Microbiology, 145(5): 1145–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chi F, Shen S H, Cheng H P, et al. 2005. Ascending migration of endophytic rhizobia, from roots to leaves, inside rice plants and assessment of benefits to rice growth physiology. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 71(11): 7271–7278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colwell R K. 2013. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples (version 9.1.0). User’s Guide and Application. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.Google Scholar
  14. Compant S, Mitter B, Colli-Mull J, et al. 2011. Endophytes of grapevine flowers, berries, and seeds: identification of cultivable bacteria, comparison with other plant parts, and visualization of niches of colonization. Microbial Ecology, 62(1): 188–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalling J W, Davis A S, Schutte B J, et al. 2011. Seed survival in soil: interacting effects of predation, dormancy and the soil microbial community. Journal of Ecology, 99(1): 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doty S L. 2008. Enhancing phytoremediation through the use of transgenics and endophytes. New Phytologist, 179(2): 318–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fahlgren C, Hagstrom Å, Nilsson D, et al. 2010. Annual variations in the diversity, viability, and origin of airborne bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76(9): 3015–3025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flynn T M, Sanford R A, Ryu H, et al. 2013. Functional microbial diversity explains groundwater chemistry in a pristine aquifer. BMC Microbiology, 13(1): 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallery R E, Dalling J W, Arnold A E. 2007. Diversity, host affinity, and distribution of seed-infecting fungi: A case study with Cecropia. Ecology, 88(3): 582–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gardner T, Acosta-Martinez V, Senwo Z, et al. 2011. Soil rhizosphere microbial communities and enzyme activities under organic farming in Alabama. Diversity, 3(3): 308–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology, 52(5): 696–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hammer Ø, Harper D A T, Ryan P D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1): 1–9.Google Scholar
  23. Hardoim P R, Van Overbeek L S, Van Elsas J D. 2008. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends in Microbiology, 16(10): 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hinrichs K U, Summons R E, Orphan V, et al. 2000. Molecular and isotopic analysis of anaerobic methane-oxidizing communities in marine sediments. Organic Geochemistry, 31(12): 1685–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huson D H, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23(2): 254–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ishak H D, Plowes R, Sen R, et al. 2011. Bacterial diversity in Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis geminata ant colonies characterized by 16S amplicon 454 Pyrosequencing. Microbial Ecology, 61(4): 821–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnston-Monje D, Raizada M N. 2012. Conservation and diversity of seed associated endophytes in Zea across boundaries of evolution, ethnography, and ecology. PLoS ONE, 6(6): e20396, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaplan D, Maymon M, Agapakis C M, et al. 2013. A survey of the microbial community in the rhizosphere of two dominant shrubs of the Negev Desert highlands, Zygophyllum dumosum (Zygophyllaceae) and Atriplex halimus (Amaranthaceae) using cultivation-dependent and cultivation-independent methods. American Journal of Botany, 100(9): 1713–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khair M, El-Shatnawi J, Mohawesh Y M. 2000. Seasonal chemical composition of saltbush in semiarid grasslands of Jordan. Journal of Range Management, 53(2): 211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar D, Hyde K D. 2004. Biodiversity and tissue-recurrence of endophytic fungi in Tripterygium wilfordii. Fungal Diversity, 17: 69–90.Google Scholar
  31. Larkin M A, Blackshields G, Brown N P, et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23(21): 2947–2948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leuchtmann A. 1993. Systematics, distribution, and host specificity of grass endophytes. Journal of Natural Toxins, 1(3): 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lucero M E, Barrow J R, Osuna P, et al. 2006. Plant-fungal interactions in arid and semiarid ecosystems: large scale impacts from microscale processes. Journal of Arid Environments, 65(2): 276–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lucero M E, Barrow J R, Osuna P, et al. 2008. Enhancing native grass productivity by co-cultivating with endophyte-laden calli. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 61(1): 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lucero M E, Unc A, Cooke P, et al. 2011. Endophyte microbiome diversity in micropropagated Atriplex canescens and Atriplex torreyi var griffithsii. PLoS ONE, 6(3): e17693, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lynch J M, Whipps J M. 1991. Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. In: Keister D L, Cregan P B. The Rhizosphere and Plant Growth. Netherlands: Springer, 14: 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martínez-Falcón A P, Durbán A, Latorre A, et al. 2011. Bacteria associated with Copestylum (Diptera, Syrphidae) larvae and their cactus host Isolatocereus dumortieri. PLoS ONE, 6(11): e27443, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCully M E. 2001. Niches for bacterial endophytes in crop plants: a plant biologist’s view. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 28(9): 983–990.Google Scholar
  39. Miranda L N, Hutchison K, Grossman A R, et al. 2013. Diversity and abundance of the bacterial community of the red macroalga Porphyra umbilicalis: did bacterial farmers produce macroalgae? PLoS ONE, 8(3): e58269, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Niu B F, Fu L M, Sun S L, et al. 2010. Artificial and natural duplicates in pyrosequencing reads of metagenomic data. Bioinformatics, 11: 187.Google Scholar
  41. Ogle D, St. John L, Tilley D. 2012. Plant guide for fourwing saltbush Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. In: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Aberdeen, ID Plant Materials Center. 83210–0296.Google Scholar
  42. Oliveros J, Venny C. 2007. An interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn Diagrams. [2015-04-15]. http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html.Google Scholar
  43. Peters D P C, Herrick J E, Monger H C, et al. 2010. Soil-vegetation-climate interactions in arid landscapes: effects of the North American monsoon on grass recruitment. Journal of Arid Environments, 74(5): 618–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Plummer M. 1984. Considerations in selecting chenopod species for range seedings. In: Tiedemann A R, McArthur E D, Stutz H C, et al. Proceedings Symposium on the Biology of Atriplex and Related Chenopods. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 183–186.Google Scholar
  45. Saikkonen K, Wäli P, Helander M, et al. 2004. Evolution of endophyte plant symbioses. Trends in Plant Sciences, 9(6): 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schardl C L, Leuchtmann A, Spiering M J. 2004. Symbioses of grasses with seedborne fungal endophytes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 55: 315–340.Google Scholar
  47. Shakhatreh Y, Kafawin O, Ceccarelli S, et al. 2001. Selection of barley lines for drought tolerance in low-rainfall areas. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 186(2): 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sun S L, Chen J, Li W Z, et al. 2010. Community cyberinfrastructure for advanced microbial ecology research and analysis: the CAMERA resource. Nucleic Acids Research, 39(suppl 1): D546–D551.Google Scholar
  49. Walker D J, Lutts S, Sánchez-Garcíac M, et al. 2014. Atriplex halimus L.: Its biology and uses. Journal of Arid Environments, 100–101: 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang Q, Garrity G M, Tiedje J M, et al. 2007. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(16): 5261–5267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Welsh S L, Atwood N D, Goodrich S, et al. 2003. A Utah Flora (3rd ed.). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University, 1–912.Google Scholar
  52. Whitman W B, Coleman D C, Wiebe W J, 1998. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(12): 6578–6583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson D. 1995. Endophyte: the evolution of a term, and clarification of its use and definition. Oikos, 73(2): 274–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer - Verlag GmbH 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad E. Tahtamouni
    • 1
  • Sa’eb Khresat
    • 2
  • Mary Lucero
    • 1
  • Jesus Sigala
    • 1
    • 3
  • Adrian Unc
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Plant & Environmental SciencesNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resources and EnvironmentJordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbidJordan
  3. 3.Seco SpiceChamberinoUSA
  4. 4.Boreal Ecosystems Research InitiativeMemorial University of NewfoundlandCorner BrookCanada
  5. 5.University of LeedsSchool of GeographyLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations