Skip to main content

Invasion syndromes: hypotheses on relationships among invasive species attributes and characteristics of invaded sites

Journal of Arid Land volume 5, pages 275–283 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

As invasion science accepts that there is no single causal factor for biological invasion, the identification of groups of traits that are often associated, or “syndromes”, is a logical move forward. Invasion syndromes are proposed to identify suites of site conditions (biotic and environmental) that render a site vulnerable to invasion by different types of invaders. This paper proposed four invasion syndromes which relate invader attributes (competitive ability, niche construction, phenotypic plasticity, and phenological niche separation) to the biotic characteristics (biodiversity and enemies) and environmental conditions (resource abundance and fluctuation) of invaded sites. The four invasion syndromes described in this paper are a development of hypotheses of how the many factors that influence species invasion might be associated. Invasion Syndrome 1 proposes that sites with relatively high resource abundance and high diversity should be vulnerable to invasion by species with high competitive ability. Invasion Syndrome 2 hypothesizes that sites with relatively low resource abundance and low diversity should be vulnerable to invasion by species with niche construction ability. Invasion Syndrome 3 postulates that sites with moderate or fluctuating resources and moderate diversity should be vulnerable to invasion by species with high phenotypic plasticity. Invasion Syndrome 4 hypothesizes that species introduced into a site where it has phenological niche separation from natives will not have to contend with interference from the biotic community at a site (diversity or natural enemies) and may invade where ever site environmental conditions suit its life history. Further work is needed to support, contradict, or refine these hypotheses and almost certainly will identify more invasion syndromes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapfel C. 2000. Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 3: 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker H. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J N, Whitlow T H. 2008. A unifying framework for biological invasions: the state factor model. Biological Invasions, 10: 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness M D, Callaway R. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9: 191–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossey B, Notzold R. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology, 83: 887–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldow R W G, Stillman R A, Durell S A D, et al. 2007. Benefits to shorebirds from invasion of a non-native shellfish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274: 1449–1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catford J A, Jansson R, Nilsson C. 2009. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Diversity and Distributions, 15: 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catford J A, Vesk P A, White M D, et al. 2011. Hotspots of plant invasion predicted by propagule pressure and ecosystem characteristics. Diversity and Distributions, 17: 1099–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chytry M, Jarosik V, Pyšek P, et al. 2008. Separating habitat invisibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology, 89: 1541–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuddington K, Hastings A. 2004. Invasive engineers. Ecological Modeling, 178: 335–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuddington K, Wilson W G, Hastings A. 2009. Ecosystem engineers: feedback and population dynamics. The American Naturalist, 173: 488–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman J H, Lortie C J, Christian C E. 2011. Native herbivores and plant facilitation mediate the performance and distribution of an invasive exotic grass. Journal of Ecology, 99: 524–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio C M. 1993. Mechanisms controlling invasion of coastal plant communities by the alien succulent Carpobrotus edulis. Ecology, 74: 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson A M, Jennions M, Nicotra A B. 2011. Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecology Letters, 14: 419–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M, Chew M K, Hobbs R J, et al. 2011. Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature, 474: 153–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M A, Grime J P, Thompson K. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology, 88: 528–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deckers B, Verheyen K, Hermy M. 2005. Effects of landscape structure on the invasive spread of black cherry Prunus serotina in an agricultural landscape in Flanders, Belgium. Ecography, 28: 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drenovsky R E, Khasanova A, James J J. 2012. Trait convergence and plasticity among native and invasive species in resource-poor environments. American Journal of Botany, 99: 629–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton C. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eviner V T, Garbach K, Baty J H. 2012. Measuring the effects of invasive plants on ecosystem services: challenges and prospects. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 5: 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrer E C, Goldberg D E. 2009. Litter drives ecosystem and plant community changes in cattail invasion. Ecological Applications, 19: 398–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D E, Landa K. 1991. Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. Journal of Ecology, 79: 1013–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart S P, Marshall D J. 2012. Advantages and disadvantages of interference-competitive ability and resource-use efficiency when invading established communities. Oikos, 121: 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Q, Cui B S, An Y. 2012. Physical stress, not biotic interactions, preclude an invasive grass from establishing in forb-dominated salt marshes. PLos One, 7: e33164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist J G, Schmidt-Gengenbach J, Slaton M R. 2011. Influence of invasive palms on terrestrial arthropod assemblages in desert spring habitat. Biological Conservation, 144: 518–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeschke J M, Gómez Aparicio L, Haider S, et al. 2012. Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining. NeoBiota, 14: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C G, Lawton J H, Shachak M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos, 69: 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane R M, Crawley M J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17: 164–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy T A, Naeem S, Howe K M, et al. 2002. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature, 417: 636–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kylafis G, Loreau M. 2008. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of niche construction for its agent. Ecology Letters, 11: 1072–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kylafis G, Loreau M. 2011. Niche construction in the light of niche theory. Ecology Letters, 14: 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson D L, Anderson P J, Newton W. 2001. Alien plant invasion in mixed-grass prairie: effects of vegetation type and anthropogenic disturbance. Ecological Applications, 11: 128–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine J M. 2000. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science, 288: 852–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine J M, Vilà M, Antonio C M D. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 270: 775–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine J M, Adler P B, Yelenik S G. 2004. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecology Letters, 7: 975–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood J L, Cassey P, Blackburn T. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20: 223–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall A S, Boucher J, Turkington R. 2006. Patterns of plant invasion along an environmental stress gradient. Journal of Vegetation Science, 17: 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack R N, Simberloff D, Lonsdale W M, et al. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications, 10: 689–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestre F T, Callaway R M, Valladares F, et al. 2009. Refining the stress-gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities. Journal of Ecology, 97: 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron J L, Vilà M. 2001. When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos, 95: 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Montenegro M A, Penuelas J, Munne-Bosch S, et al. 2012. Higher plasticity in ecophysiological traits enhances the performance and invasion success of Taraxacum officinale (dandelion) in alpine environments. Biological Invasions, 14: 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen L, Oksanen T. 2000. The logic and realism of the hypothesis of exploitation ecosystems. American Naturalist, 155: 703–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olech M, Chwedorzewska K J. 2011. The first appearance and establishment of an alien vascular plant in natural habitats on the forefield of a retreating glacier in Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 23: 153–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palacio-Lopez K, Gianoli E. 2011. Invasive plants do not display greater phenotypic plasticity than their native or non-invasive counterparts: a meta-analysis. Oikos, 120: 1393–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins L B, Leger E A, Nowak R S. 2011. Invasion triangle: an organizational framework for species invasion. Ecology and Evolution, 1: 610–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins L B, Nowak R S. 2013. Native and non-native grasses generate common types of plant-soil feedbacks by altering soil nutrients and microbial communities. Oikos, 122: 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichancourt J B, van Klinken R D. 2012. Phenotypic plasticity influences the size, shape and dynamics of the geographic distribution of an invasive plant. PLos One, 7: 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P, Jarosik V, Hulme P E, et al. 2012. A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Global Change Biology, 18: 1725–1737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees M, Condit R, Crawley M, et al. 2001. Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics. Science, 293: 650–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards C L, Bossdorf O, Muth N Z, et al. 2006. Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecology Letters, 9: 981–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson D M, Pyšek P, Rejmanek M, et al. 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions, 6: 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson D M, Pyšek P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progress in Physical Geography, 30: 409–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger O, Biesmeijer J C, Bommarco R, et al. 2010. Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination. Biological Reviews, 85: 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea K, Chesson P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17: 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren T J, Barnett D T, Kartesz J. 2003. The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1: 11–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren T J, Crosier C, Chong G W, et al. 2005. Life-history habitat matching in invading non-native plant species. Plant and Soil, 277: 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Koppel J, Huisman J, van der Wal R, et al. 1996. Patterns of herbivory along a productivity gradient: an empirical and theoretical investigation. Ecology, 77: 736–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Weiner J. 2004. Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? Evidence from pair-wise experiments. Oikos, 105: 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Holle B, Simberloff D. 2005. Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology, 86: 3212–3218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker S, Wilson J B, Lee W G. 2005. Does fluctuating resource availability increase invasibility? Evidence from field experiments in New Zealand short tussock grassland. Biological Invasions, 7: 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle D A. 2001. Experimental demonstration that plant diversity reduces invasibility-evidence of a biological mechanism or a consequence of sampling effect? Oikos, 95: 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolkovich E M, Cleland E E. 2011. The phenology of plant invasions: a community ecology perspective. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9: 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resource Management, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA

    Lora B. Perkins

  2. Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, USA

    Robert S. Nowak

Authors
  1. Lora B. Perkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert S. Nowak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lora B. Perkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perkins, L.B., Nowak, R.S. Invasion syndromes: hypotheses on relationships among invasive species attributes and characteristics of invaded sites. J. Arid Land 5, 275–283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-013-0161-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-013-0161-3

Keywords

  • non-native
  • competitive ability
  • niche construction
  • ecosystem engineering
  • phenotypic plasticity
  • phenological niche separation