Responses of root growth of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae) to different simulated groundwater depths in the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert, China

Abstract

Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae) is a spiny, perennial herb. The species grows in the salinized, arid regions in North China. This study investigated the response characteristics of the root growth and the distribution of one-year-old A. sparsifolia seedlings to different groundwater depths in controlled plots. The ecological adaptability of the root systems of A. sparsifolia seedlings was examined using the artificial digging method. Results showed that: (1) A. sparsifolia seedlings adapted to an increase in groundwater depth mainly through increasing the penetration depth and growth rate of vertical roots. The vertical roots grew rapidly when soil moisture content reached 3%–9%, but slowly when soil moisture content was 13%–20%. The vertical roots stopped growing when soil moisture content reached 30% (the critical soil moisture point). (2) The morphological plasticity of roots is an important strategy used by A. sparsifolia seedlings to obtain water and adapt to dry soil conditions. When the groundwater table was shallow, horizontal roots quickly expanded and tillering increased in order to compete for light resources, whereas when the groundwater table was deeper, vertical roots developed quickly to exploit space in the deeper soil layers. (3) The decrease in groundwater depth was probably responsible for the root distribution in the shallow soil layers. Root biomass and surface area both decreased with soil depth. One strategy of A. sparsifolia seedlings in dealing with the increase in groundwater depth is to increase root biomass in the deep soil layers. The relationship between the root growth/distribution of A. sparsifolia and the depth of groundwater table can be used as guidance for harvesting A. sparsifolia biomass and managing water resources for forage grasses. It is also of ecological significance as it reveals how desert plants adapt to arid environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Agzhigitova N I, Allanazarova U, Kapustina L A, et al. 1995. Transformation of desert pasture vegetation under effect of anthropogenic pressure. Problems of Desert Development, 3: 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arndt S K, Arampatsis C, Foetzki A, et al. 2004a. Contrasting patterns of leaf solute accumulation and salt adaptation in four phreatophytic desert plants in a hyperarid desert with saline groundwater. Journal of Arid Environments, 59(2): 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arndt S K, Kahmen A, Arampatsis C, et al. 2004b. Nitrogen fixation and metabolism by groundwater-dependent perennial plants in a hyperarid desert. Oecologia, 141(3): 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ball W S, Robbins W W. 1933. Camelthorn, Alhagi camelorum fish. Monthly Bulletin of the California State Department of Agriculture, 22: 258–260.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bradshaw A D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. In: Caspari E W. Advances in Genetics. London: Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd., Berkeley Square House, 13: 115–155.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caldwell M M, Richards J H. 1986. Competing root systems: morphology and models of absorption. In: Givnish T J. On the Economy of Plant Form and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251–271.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Canadell J, Zedler P H. 1995. Underground structures of woody plants in Mediterranean ecosystems of Australia, California and Chile. In: Arroyo M T K, Zedler P H, Fox M D. Ecology and Biogeography of Mediterranean Ecosystems in Chile, California, and Australia. New York: Springer-Verlag, 177–210.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dahlman R C, Kucera C L. 1965. Root productivity and turnover in native prairie. Ecology, 46: 84–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Kroon H, Visser E J W. 2003. Root Ecology. Heidelberg: Springe Berlin Heidelberg, 150–191.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Drennan P M, Nobel P S. 1996. Temperature influences on root growth for Encelia farinosa (Asteraceae), Pleuraphis rigida (Poaceae), and Agave deserti (Agavaceae) under current and doubled CO2 concentrations. American Journal of Botany, 83: 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. George E, Seith B, Schaeffer C, et al. 1997. Responses of Picea, Pinus and Pseudotsuga roots to heterogeneous nutrient distribution in soil. Tree Physiology, 17(1): 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gong Y M, Hu Y K, Fang F, et al. 2012. Carbon storage and vertical distribution in three shrubland communities in Gurbantünggüt Desert, Uygur Autonomous Region of Xinjiang, Northwest China. Chinese Geographical Science, 22(5): 541–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Graham E H. 1941. Legumes for Erosion Control and Wildlife. Washington: U. S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grime J P, Campbell B D, Mackey J M I. 1991. Root plasticity, nitrogen capture and competitive ability. In: Atkinson D. Plant Root Growth: An Ecological Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Press, 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horton J L, Hart S C, Kolb T E. 2003. Physiological condition and water source use of Sonoran Desert riparian trees at the Bill Williams River, Arizona, USA. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies, 39(1): 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huey R B, Gilchrist G W, Carlson M L, et al. 2000. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science, 287(5451): 308–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson R B, Canadell J, Ehleringer J R, et al. 1996. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia, 108(3): 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson R B, Mooney H A, Schulze E D. 1997. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94(14): 7362–7366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jastrow J D, Miller R M. 1993. Neighbor influences on root morphology and mycorrhizal fungus colonization in tallgrass prairie plants. Ecology, 74(2): 561–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Joslin J D, Wolfe M H, Hanson P J. 2000. Effects of altered water regimes on forest root systems. New Phytologist, 147(1): 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kembel S W, Cahill Jr F J. 2005. Plant phenotypic plasticity belowground: a phylogenetic perspective on root foraging trade-offs. The American Naturalist, 166(2): 216–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khafagi A A F. 1995. The taxonomic significance of seed protein in some fabaceae species in Egypt. Annals of Agricultural Science, 40(1): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li X Y, Zhang X M, Zeng F J, et al. 2002. Water relations on Alhagi sparsifolia in the southern fringe of Taklamakan Desert. Acta Botanica Sinica, 44(10): 1219–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li X Y, Lin L S, Zhao Q, et al. 2010. Influence of groundwater depth on species composition and community structure in the transition zone of Cele oasis. Journal of Arid Land, 2(4): 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lloret F, Casanovas C, Penuelas J, et al. 1999. Seedling survival of Mediterranean shrubland species in relation to root: shoot ratio, seed size and water and nitrogen use. Functional Ecology, 13(2): 210–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ma X D, Chen Y N, Zhu C G, et al. 2011. The variation in soil moisture and the appropriate groundwater table for desert riparian forest along the Lower Tarim River. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(1): 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nilsson C, Jansson R, Zinko U. 1997. Long-term responses of river-margin vegetation to water-level regulation. Science, 276(5313): 798–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pallardy S G, Rhoads J L. 1993. Morphological adaptations to drought in seedlings of deciduous angiosperms. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23(9): 1766–1774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pigliucci M. 2005. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9): 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reader R J, Jalili A, Grime J P, et al. 1993. A comparative study of plasticity in seedling rooting depth in drying soil. Journal of Ecology, 81(3): 543–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rood S B, Zanewich K, Stefura C, et al. 2000. Influence of water table decline on growth allocation and endogenous gibberellins in black cottonwood. Tree Physiology, 20(12): 831–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schenk H J, Jackson R B. 2002. Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 90(3): 480–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schenk H J. 2005. Vertical vegetation structure below ground: scaling from root to globe. In: Esser k, Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, et al. Progress in Botany. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 66: 341–373.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Schulze E D, Mooney H A, Sala O E, et al. 1996. Rooting depth, water availability, and vegetation cover along an aridity gradient in Patagonia. Oecologia, 108(3): 503–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharp R E, Davies W J. 1985. Root growth and water uptake by maize plant in drying soil. Journal of Experimental Botany, 36(9): 1441–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shaver G R, Billings W D. 1975. Root production and root turnover in a wet tundra ecosystem, Barrow, Alaska. Ecology, 56(2): 401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thomas F M, Arndt S K, Bruelheide H, et al. 2000. Ecological basis for a sustainable management of the indigenous vegetation in a central-Asian desert: presentation and first results. Journal of Applied Botany, 74(5–6): 212–219.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, De Jong G, et al. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10(5): 212–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang K, Tian C Y, Li C J. 2012. Root growth and spatio-temporal distribution of three common annual halophytes in a saline desert, northern Xinjiang. Journal of Arid Land, 4(3): 330–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou Z C, Shangguan Z P. 2007. Vertical distribution of fine roots in relation to soil factors in Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. forest of the Loess Plateau of China. Plant and Soil, 291(1–2): 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to FanJiang Zeng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeng, F., Song, C., Guo, H. et al. Responses of root growth of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae) to different simulated groundwater depths in the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert, China. J. Arid Land 5, 220–232 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-013-0154-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Alhagi sparsifolia Shap.
  • simulated groundwater depth
  • root system growth and distribution
  • ecological adaptability
  • root morphological plasticity