Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of precipitable water vapor variation for east mediterranean using GNSS

  • Original Study
  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of climate change is an important field of research. Monitoring of atmospheric variability especially the tropospheric precipitable water vapor (PWV) is a powerful way to investigate climate change. Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) provide a good tool for studying atmospheric parameters as GNSS signals along its path from the satellites to the ground based receivers suffer a significant delay due to the refractivity of earth’s atmosphere. GNSS signals are not only delayed but also refracted in the neutral atmosphere. The zenith wet delays (ZWD) caused by the troposphere can be estimated during the geodetic processing of GNSS signals. Since the ZWD is tightly correlated to the PWV, GNSS observations can be used to study the changes of PWV. In this study GNSS data from the Egyptian permanent GNSS network (EPGN), International GNSS Service (IGS), EUREF Permanent Network (EPN) and Scripps Orbit and Permanent Array Center (SOPAC), for the years 2013 and 2014, were used. These GNSS stations provided a good geometrical coverage over the respective region. All GNSS data were processed using Bernese V 5.2 software. The needed product from GNSS data processing is the tropospheric zenith total delay (ZTD) over each GNSS site. The ZTD is divided based on physical parameters into zenith hydrostatic delay (ZHD) and zenith wet delay (ZWD). The ZWD is the basic observable used to calculate PWV. The values of the PWV were calculated and its variation over the study area was investigated. The quality of calculated PWV values from GNSS data evaluated against traditional Radiosonde (RS) measurements. The results of GNSS PWV showed good agreement with RS PWV when the PWV values were low, but this agreement became worse at high PWV values as the differences between the two techniques increased. The correlation coefficient between RS PWV and GNSS PWV varied from 0.31 to 0.84. Standard deviation of the differences between RS PWV and GNSS PWV ranged from 2.369 to 5.973 mm. The PWV estimated from GNSS observations had annual cycle, and its cycle in 2013 was different from that in 2014. The PWV differences between the 2 years clarified that the water vapor content over the east Mediterranean in most of 2014 days was higher than that in 2013. Furthermore, PWV variations were noted on both temporal and spatial scales. The highest temporal variation value was 25.41 mm whereas the maximum value of the spatial variation was 19.67 mm. The present study illustrated the importance of using geodetic networks to provide atmospheric information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed F (2010) Evaluation of GNSS as a tool for monitoring tropospheric water vapour. MSc thesis, Department of Earth and Space Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden

  • Bender M, Stosius R, Zus F, Dick G, Wickert J, Raabe A (2011) GNSS water vapour tomography—expected improvements by combining GPS, GLONASS and Galileo observations. Adv Space Res 47(2011):886–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevis M, Businger S, Herring TA, Rocken C, Anthes RA, Ware RH (1992) GPS meteorology: remote sensing of atmospheric water vapour using the global positioning system. J Geophys Res 97:15787–15801. https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD01517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevis M, Businger S, Chiswell S, Herring TA, Anthes RA, Rocken C, Ware RH (1994) GPS meteorology: mapping zenith wet delays onto precipitable water. J Appl Meteorol 33:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033%3c0379:GMMZWD%3e2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock O, Willis P, Wang J, Mears C (2014) A high-quality homogenized global long-term (1993–2008) DORIS precipitable water data set for climate monitoring and model verification. J Geophys Res 119:7209–7230. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P, Meindl M (2015) Bernese GNSS Software Version 5.2 User manual. Astronomical Institute, University of Bern

  • Dai A, Wang J, Ware RH, Van Hove T (2002) Diurnal variation in water vapor over North America and its implications for sampling errors in RS humidity. J Geophys Res 107:4090. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan S (2013) Assimilation of GNSS ZTD and radar radial velocity for the benefit of very-short-range regional weather forecasts. Q J R Meteorol Soc 139:2097–2107. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geodesy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0300-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drobinski P, Ducrocq V, Alpert P, Anagnostou E, Béranger K, Borga M, Braud I, Chanzy A, Davolio S, Delrieu G, Estournel C, FilaliBoubrahmi N, Font J, Grubisic V, Gualdi S, Homa VR, Ivančan-Picek B, Kottmeier C, Kotroni V, Lagouvardos K, Lionello P, Llasat CM, Ludwig W, Lutoff C, Mariotti A, Richard E, Romero R, Rotunno R, Roussot O, Ruin I, Somot S, Taupier-Letage I, Tintore J, Uijlenhoet R, Wernli H (2014) A 10-year multidisciplinary program on the mediterranean water cycle, HYMEX report, American Meteorological Society. 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00242.1

  • Duan J, Bevis M, Fang P, Bock Y, Chiswell S, Businger S, Solheim F, Van Hove T, Ware R, McClusky S, Herring AT, King WR (1996) GPS meteorology: direct estimation of the absolute value of precipitable water. J Appl Meteorol 35:830–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerova G, Jones J, Douša J, Dick G, de Haan S, Pottiaux E, Bock O, Pacione R, Elgered G, Vedel H, Bender M (2016) Review of the state of the art and future prospects of the ground-based GNSS meteorology in Europe. Atmos Meas Tech 9:5385–5406. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurbuz G, Jin S, Mekik C (2015) Sensing precipitable water vapor (PWV) using GPS in Turkey—validation and variations: chapter 6. In: Jin S (ed) Satellite positioning—methods, models and applications, InTech Publisher, Rijeka, Croatia. ISBN: 978-953-51-1738-4. pp 117–129. https://doi.org/10.5772/60025

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindskog M, Ridal M, Thorsteinsson S, Ning T (2017) Data assimilation of GNSS zenith total delays from a Nordic processing centre. Atmos Chem Phys 17:13983–13998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mekik C, Deniz I (2017) Modelling and validation of the weighted mean temperature for Turkey. Meteorol Appl 24:92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mile M, Benáček P, Rózsa S (2019) The use of GNSS zenith total delays in operational AROME/Hungary 3D-Var over a central European domain. Atmos Meas Tech 12:1569–1579. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1569-2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mockler SB (1995) Water vapor in the climate system. Special Report, American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2000 Florida Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20009. ISBN 0-87590-865-9

  • Raju CS, Saha K, Thampi BV, Parameswaran K (2007) Empirical model for mean temperature for Indian zone and estimation of precipitable water vapor from ground based GPS measurement. Ann Geophys 25:1935–1948. www.ann-geophys.net/25/1935/2007/

  • Rocken C, Hove VT, Johnson J, Solheim F, Ware R, Bevis M, Chiswell S, Businger S (1995) GPS/STORM–GPS sensing of atmospheric water vapor for meteorology. J Atmos Ocean Technol 12:468–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rózsa S, Kenyeres A, Weidinger T, Gyöngyösi AZ (2014) Near real-time estimation of integrated water vapour from GNSS observations in Hungary. Int Assoc Geodesy Symp 139:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37222-3_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saastamoinen J (1972) Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging of satellites. Monogr Ser 15:247–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregoning P, Boers R, O’Brien D, Hendy M (1998) Accuracy of absolute precipitable water vapour estimates from GPS. J Geophys Res 103(D22):28701–28710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware RH, Fulker DW, Stein SA, Anderson DN, Avery SK, Clark RD, Droegemeier KK, Kuettner JP, Minster JB, Sorooshian S (2000) SuomiNet: a real-time national GPS network for atmospheric research and education. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81:677–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the staff of Physical and Satellite Geodesy Institute (PSGD), TU-Darmstadt, Germany. Also, the authors are thankful to staff of the Crustal Movement Laboratory, Geodynamic Department, National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG), Egypt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia AbouAly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darrag, M., AbouAly, N., Mohamed, AM.S. et al. Evaluation of precipitable water vapor variation for east mediterranean using GNSS. Acta Geod Geophys 55, 257–275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-020-00292-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-020-00292-7

Keywords

Navigation