Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation into the linear relationship between the AE, Dst and ap indices during different magnetic and solar activity conditions

  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are numerous geomagnetic indices used in monitoring various magnetospheric and ionospheric phenomena. Some of the most widely used indices are the ap, AE and Dst. In this work, the relationship between these three geomagnetic indices is investigated at different levels of solar and magnetic activity. 3-h average data spanning 8-years were used—high (HSA), moderate (MSA) and low solar activity (LSA) periods cover the years 1999–2001, 2004–2005, and 2006, 2009–2010 respectively. All the investigated correlation pairs recorded the highest/lowest during the LSA/HSA periods. The ap/AE correlation was found to be highest ranging within 70–78 % at any solar activity. The ap versus AE and Dst multiple correlation reached 94.0, 92.1, and 89.2 % for HSA, MSA, and LSA conditions, respectively, and 72.1, 83.3, and 80.0 % for the main phase, recovery phase and quiet conditions respectively. Moreover, higher percentage correlations were observed for the ap/AE pair at any geomagnetic conditions than for the ap/Dst and AE/Dst pairs. The ring current index Dst is observed to have a greater influence on ap during geomagnetic storm periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adebesin BO (2008) Roles of Interplanetary and Geomagnetic parameters in ‘intense’ and ‘very intense’ magnetic storms generation and their geoeffectiveness. Acta Geod et Geophys Hung 43(4):383–408. doi:10.1556/AGeod.43.2008.4.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adebesin BO, Chukwuma VU (2008) On the variation between Dst and IMF Bz during ‘intense’ and ‘very intense’ geomagnetic storms. Acta Geod et Geophys Hung, 43(1):1–15. doi:10.1556/AGeod.43.2008.1.1. ISSN 1217-8977

  • Adebesin BO, Adeniyi JO, Adimula IA, Reinisch BW, Yumoto K (2013a) F2 layer characteristics and electrojet strength over an equatorial station. Adv Space Res 52(5):791–800. doi:10.1016/j.asr2013.05.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adebesin BO, Ikubanni SO, Adebiyi JS, Joshua BW (2013b) Multi-station observation of ionospheric magnetic disturbance of March 9 2012 and comparison with IRI model. Adv Space Res 52(4):604–613. doi:10.1016/j.asr2013.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adebesin BO, Adeniyi JO, Adimula IA, Reinisch BW (2013c) Equatorial vertical plasma drift velocities and electron densities inferred from ground-based ionosonde measurements during low solar activity. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 97:58–64. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2013.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adebesin BO, Adekoya BJ, Ikubanni SO, Adebiyi SJ, Adebesin OA, Joshua BW, Olonade KO (2014) Ionospheric foF2 morphology and response of F2 layer height over Jicamarca during different solar epochs and comparison with IRI-2012 model. J Earth Syst Sci 123(4):751–765. doi:10.1007/s12040-014-0435-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amory-Mazaudier C (2009) Electric current systems in the earth’s environment. Niger J Space Res 8:178–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade WB, Sojka JJ, Zhu L (1995) A correlative comparison of the ring current and auroral electrojects using geomagnetic indices. J Geophys Res 100:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortie AL (1912) Sunspots and terrestrial magnetic phenomena, 1898–1911. Mon Not R Astron Soc 73:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fares Saba MM, Gonzalez WD, Clua de Gonzalez AL (1997) Relationships between the AE, ap and Dst indices near solar minimum (1974) and at solar maximum (1979). Ann Geophys 15:1265–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimald SR (2013) A comparative study of Kp, Ap, Km, Am, Dst and AE index. Geophys Res Abstr 15:5316

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulyaeva TL (1993) Indices of geomagnetic variations and ionospheric disturbances. Adv Space Res 13(3):21–31. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(93)90243-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Häkkinen LVT, Pulkkinen TI, Pirjola RJ, Nevanlinna H, Tanskanen EI, Turner NE (2003) Seasonal and diurnal variation of geomagnetic activity: revised Dst versus external drivers. J Geophys Res A 108(A2):1060. doi:10.1029/2002JA009428

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanslmeier A (2007) The Sun and space weather. Astrophysics and space science library, 2nd edn. Springer, Netherland, p 191. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5604-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamide Y (1988) Electrodynamical processes in the Earth’s ionosphere and magnetosphere. Kyoto Sangyo University Press, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Mouël J-L, Blanter E, Shnirman M, Courtillot V (2012) On secular changes of correlation between geomagnetic indices and variations in solar activity. J Geophys Res 117:A09103. doi:10.1029/2012JA017643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewe CA, Prolss GW (1997) Classification and mean behavior of magnetic storms. J Geophys Res 102:14209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love JJ, Remick KJ (2007) Magnetic indices. In: Encyclopedia of geomagnetism and paleomagnetism. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 509–512. http://geomag.usgs.gov/downloads/publications/Magnetic_Indices.pdf

  • Mayaud PN (1980) Derivation, meaning and use of geomagnetic indices. Geophysical monograph 22. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh D (1959) On annual variation of magnetic disturbance. R Soc Lond 251:525–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menvielle M, Berthelier A (1991) K-derived planetary indices: description and availability. Rev Geophys 29(3):415–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrella M (2012) A short-term ionospheric forecasting empirical regional model (IFERM) to predict the critical frequency of the F2 layer during moderate, disturbed, and very disturbed geomagnetic conditions over the European area. Ann Geophys 30:343–355. doi:10.5194/angeo-30-343-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrella M, Perrone L (2008) A local ionospheric model for forecasting the critical frequency of the F2 layer during disturbed geomagnetic and ionospheric conditions. Ann Geophys 26:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond AD, Maute A (2014) Ionospheric electrodynamics modeling. In: Huba J, Schunk R, Khazanov G (eds) Modeling the ionosphere-thermosphere system. Wiley, Chichester, pp 57–71. doi:10.1002/9781118704417.ch6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rostoker G (1972) Geomagnetic indices. Rev Geophys Space Phys 10:157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostoker G (1991) A quantitative relationship between AE and Kp. J Geophys Res 96:5853–5857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell CT, McPherron RL (1973) Semi-annual variation of geomagnetic activity. J Geophys Res 78:92–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saba M, Gonzalez WD, Gonzalez ALC (1994) Relationship between the Dst, ap and AE indices. Adv Space Res 14:435–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki Y, Kosch MJ (2014) Geomagnetic lunar and solar daily variations during the last 100 years. J Geophys Res Space Phys 119:6732–6744. doi:10.1002/2014JA020203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the National Space Science Data Center (NSSDC) through the OMNIWEB database (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/omniweb) for the hourly data of the magnetic indices used. I will like to thank the three reviewers for their positive criticism and suggestions, which had improved the quality and structure of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. O. Adebesin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adebesin, B.O. Investigation into the linear relationship between the AE, Dst and ap indices during different magnetic and solar activity conditions. Acta Geod Geophys 51, 315–331 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-015-0128-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-015-0128-2

Keywords

Navigation