Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 113–123 | Cite as

Image-based approach for satellite visibility analysis in critical environments

  • Jen-Yu HanEmail author
  • Tsung-Hsien Juan


The global navigation satellite system (GNSS) positioning solution relies greatly on the satellite configuration visible at a specific receiver location. As a consequence, satellite visibility analysis considering the surrounding terrain obstruction, becomes a key step when the GNSS positioning quality is to be evaluated. Current satellite visibility analysis requires high-resolution digital surface model (DSM) data and is thus a pricey and time-consuming task. In this study, an image-based approach for the satellite visibility analysis is proposed. Terrain obstructions are first identified from photo images, using image-processing techniques. The maximal obstruction angle at each direction is then determined, based on photogrammetric principles. According to the results from a case study, this novel approach provides a satellite visibility analysis solution comparable to that of the current DSM approaches, but with significantly improved computational efficiency. Consequently, a highly efficient and low-cost satellite visibility analysis becomes possible when the proposed approach is implemented.


Satellite visibility analysis Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) Dilution of precision (DOP) Image classification Photogrammetric analysis Sky plot 



The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which significantly improved the quality of the original manuscript. The funding support from the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan (under contract No. 103-2221-E-002-128-MY2) is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Ackermann F (1999) Airborne laser scanning: present and future expectations. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 54:64–67. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00009-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackermann S, Angrisano A, Del Pizzo S, Gaglione S, Gioia C, Troisi S (2014) Digital surface models for GNSS mission planning in critical environments. J Surv Eng. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000119 Google Scholar
  3. Canny J (1986) A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 8(6):679–698. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiang KW, Peng WC, Yeh YH, Chen KH (2009) Study of alternative GPS network meteorological sensors in Taiwan: case studies of the plum rains and typhoon Sinlaku. Sensors 9(6):5001–5021. doi: 10.3390/s90605001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Han JY, Wu Y, Liu RY (2012) Determining the optimal site location of GNSS base stations. Bol Ciênc Geod 18(1):154–169. doi: 10.1590/S1982-21702012000100009 Google Scholar
  6. Han JY, Guo J, Chuang JY (2014) Efficient obstruction analysis for the GNSS relative positioning of a terrestrial mobile mapping system. Surv Rev. doi: 10.1179/1752270614Y.0000000110 Google Scholar
  7. Hobi ML, Ginzler C (2012) Accuracy assessment of digital surface models based on WorldView-2 and ADS80 stereo remote sensing data. Sensors 12:6347–6368. doi: 10.3390/s120506347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Collins J (2011) GPS theory and practice, 5th edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Hogan MK, Santos MC (2005) Advanced mission planning tool for real-time kinematic (RTK) GPS surveying. In: Proceeding of Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting, San Diego, 24–26 Jan 2005Google Scholar
  10. Kleijer F, Odijk D, Verbree E (2009) Prediction of GNSS availability and accuracy in urban environments—case study Schiphol Airport. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography, Springer, New York, pp 387–406. doi:  10.1007/978-3-540-87393-8_23
  11. Kobler A, Pfeifer N, Ogrinc P, Todorovski L, Oštir K, Džeroski S (2007) Repetitive interpolation: a robust algorithm for DTM generation from Aerial Laser Scanner Data in forested terrain. Remote Sens Environ 108(1):9–23. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leick A (2004) GPS satellite surveying, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Li J, Taylor G, Kidner D, Ware M (2006) Prediction of GPS multipath effect using LiDAR digital surface models and building footprints. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4295:42–53. doi: 10.1007/11935148_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mikhail EM, Bethel JS, McGlone JC (2001) Introduction to modern photogrammetry. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Misra P, Enge P (2011) Global positioning system: signals, measurements, and performance. Ganga-Jamuna Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  16. Nurminen K, Karjalainen M, Yu X, Hyyppä J, Honkavaara E (2013) Performance of dense digital surface models based on image matching in the estimation of plot-level forest variables. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 83:104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Strang G, Borre K (1997) Linear algebra, geodesy, and GPS. Wellesley-Cambridge Press, WellesleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Taylor G, Li J, Kidner D, Ware M (2005) Surface modeling for GPS satellite visibility. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3833:281–295. doi: 10.1007/11599289_24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang K, Liu GJ, Wu F, Densley L, Retscher G (2008) An investigation of the signal performance of the current and future GNSS in typical urban canyons in Australia using a high fidelity 3D urban model. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography, Springer, New York, pp 407–420. doi:  10.1007/978-3-540-87393-8_24

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations