Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the seismicity for the Marmara region with statistical approaches

  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Marmara region has been divided into six sub-regions having regard to the certain seismotectonic characteristics of the region, to study the seismicity. For this, the data belonging to both the historical and instrumental period has been used. The probabilities of earthquake recurrences were obtained by using Poisson statistical distribution models. Gutenberg–Richter (GR) relationship for each sub-region has been computed and, a- and b-values known as seismic hazard scaling parameters have been determined by linear least square (LLS) method and maximum likelihood (ML) method. The highest and the lowest \(b\)-values determined by LLS are found for sub-region 4 (Saros Gulf, \(0.74\pm 0.08\)) and sub-region 1 (Duzce, \(0.56\pm 0.06\)), respectively. The highest \(a\)-value for sub-region 4 as \(5.05\pm 0.05\) and the lowest \(a\)-value for sub-region 3 (Tekirdag) as \(4.12\pm 0.02\) are found. Likewise, the calculated lowest and highest \(b\)-values with ML are \(0.55\pm 0.05\) for sub-region 1 and \(0.68\pm 0.07\) for sub-region 4, respectively. Also, \(b\)-value for all region (108 years and \(M_{S}\ge 4.0\)) are estimated as \(0.71\pm 0.03\) with LLS and \(0.65\pm 0.02\) with ML. The highest earthquake occurrence probabilities of \(M_{S} \ge 7.0\) in the next 100 years according to the Poisson distribution are found as 74.4 % for sub-region 1 (Duzce), 58.6 % for sub-region 2 (Izmit), 54.3 % for sub-region 3 (Tekirdag) and 49.7 % for sub-region 5 (Bandirma). The shortest recurrence period for the earthquake with the same magnitude is determined as 73 years for sub-region 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki K (1965) Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula \(\text{ LogN }=a-\text{ bm }\) and its confidence limits. Bull Earthq Res Inst Tokyo Univ 43:237–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Akol B, Bekler T (2013) Assessment of the statistical earthquake hazard parameters for NW Turkey. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0659-1

  • Alsan E, Tezucan L (1975) An earthquake catalogue for Turkey for the interval 1913–1970 report Kandilli Observatory. Istanbul and Uppsala University, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Tarazia E, Sandvol E (2007) Alternative models of seismic hazard evaluation along the Jordan-Dead Sea transform. Earthq Spectra 23(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN (2001) Reassesment of earthquakes 1900–1999 in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East. Geophys J Int 145:471–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN (2002) The seismic activity of the Marmara region over the last 2000 years. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armijo R, Meyer B, Navarro S, King G (2002) Asymmetric slip partitioning in the sea of Marmara pull-apart: a clue to propagation processes of the North Anatolian Fault? Terra Nova 14:80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barka AA (1992) The North Anatolian Fault zone. Ann Tecton 5(6):164–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Barka AA (1997) Neotectonics of the Marmara region in active tectonics of Northwest Anatolia. In: Schindler C, Pfister M (eds) The Marmara poly-project. Hochschul-Verlag AG an der ETH, Zurich, pp 55–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Barka AA, Reilinger R (1997) Active tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean region deduced from GPS, neotectonic and seismicity data. Ann Geofis 4:587–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Bath M (1966) Earthquake energie and magnitude. Phys Chem Earth 7:115–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchon M, Bouin MP, Karabulut H, Toksoz MN, Dietrich M (2001) How fast is rupture during an earthquake? New insights from the 1999 Turkey earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett 28:2723–2726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bufe CG, Harsh PW (1977) Steady-state seismic slip: a precise recurrence model. Geophys Res Lett 4:91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton PW, Xu Y, Qin C, Tselentis GA (2004) A catalogue of seismicity in Greece and the adjacent areas for the twentieth century. Tectonophysics 390:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caputo M (1974) Analysis of seismic risk, NATO advanced study institutes series. Applied sciences, vol 3. Noordhoff, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Coral A (2006) Dependence of earthquake recurrence times and independence of magnitudes on seismicity history. Tectonophysics 424:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley H, Bommer JJ (2006) Modeling seismic hazard in earthquake loss models with spatially distributed exposure. Bull Earthq Eng 4:249–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey JW (1976) Seismicity of Northern Anatolia. Bull Seismol Soc Am 66:843–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M, Demircioglu K, Beyen K et al (2014) May 01, 2014 Bingöl (Turkey) Earthquake Priliminary Report. Bogazici University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute Istanbul Turkey. http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/depremmuh/eski/eqspecials/bingol/bingol_eq.htm

  • Eyidogan H (1988) Rates of crustal deformation in Western Turkey as deduced from major earthquakes. Tectonophysics 148:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian. Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(15):1363–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurbuz C, Aktar M, Eyidogan H, Cisternas A, Haessler H, Barka A, Ergin M, Turkelli N, Polat O, Ucer SB, Kuleli S, Baris S, Kaypak B, Bekler T, Zor E, Bicmen F (2000) The seismotectonics of the Marmara region (Turkey): results from a microseismic experiment. Tectonophysics 316:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1942) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 32:163–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartleb RD, Dolan JF, Akyuz HS, Dawson TE, Tucker AZ, Yerli B, Rockwell TK, Toraman E, Cakir Z, Dikbas A (2002) Surface rupture and slip distribution along the Karadere segment of the 17 August 1999 Izmit and the Western section of the 12 November 1999 Duzce, Turkey, earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordanovski LR, Todorovska MI (1995) Earthquake source parameters for seismic hazard assessment: how to obtain them from geologic data, historic seismicity and relative plate motions. In: Duma G (ed) Proceedings of 10th European conference earthquake engineering, 28 Aug–2 Sept 1994. Source mechanism Balkema Rotterdam, Vienna, Austria special theme session S01.2, vol 4, pp 2561–2566

  • Khan PK, Ghosh M (2010) Seismic b-value and the assessment of ambient stressi Northeast India. Pure Appl Geophys 168:1693–1706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulhanek O (2005) Seminar on \(b\)-value (10–19 Dec). Department of Geophysics, Charles University, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Pichon X, Chamot-Rooke N, Rangin C (2003) The North Anatolian Fault in the Marmara Sea 2003. J Geophys Res B Solid Earth Planets 108:2170–2179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckenzie D (1972) Active tectonics of the Mediterranean region. Geophys J R Astron Soc 30:109–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulargia F, Geller RJ (2003) Earthquake science and seismic risk reduction. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okay AI, Kaslilar-Ozcan A, Imren C, Boztepe-Guney A, Demirbag E (2000) Active faults and evolving strike-slip Basins in the Marmara Sea, Northwest Turkey: a multichannel seismic reflection study. Tectonophysics 321:189–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orgulu G (2011) Seismicity and source parameters for small-scale earthquakes along the splays of the North Anatolian Fault (NAF) in the Marmara Sea. Geophys J Int 184:385–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou EE, Karakostas VG (2001) Rupture zones in the area of the 17.08.99 Izmit (NW Turkey) large earthquake \((\text{ M }_{\rm w}7.4)\) and stress changes caused by its generation. J Seismol 5:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papazachos BC (1989) A time-predictable model for earthquake generation in Greece. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangin C, Demirbag E, Imren C, Crusson A, Normand A, Le Drezen E (2001) Marine atlas of the Sea of Marmara. IFREMER-Brest Technology Center, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Saroglu F, Emre O, Kuscu I (1992) Active fault map of Turkey, Maden Tetkik ve Arama (in Turkish)

  • Sato T, Kasahara J, Taymaz T, Ito M, Kamimura A, Hayakawa T, Tan O (2004) A study of microearthquake seismicity and focal mechanisms within the Sea of Marmara (NW Turkey) using Ocean Bottom Seismometers (Obss). Tectonophysics 2004: doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2004.07.018

  • Sayil N (2013) Long-term earthquake prediction in the Marmara region based on the regional time- and magnitude-predictable model. Acta Geophys 61:338–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz CH (1968) The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:399–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah HC, Movassate M (1975) Seismic risk analysis of California State. In: Water project proceedings of fifth European conference on earthquake engineering, vol 2, p 156

  • Smyth C, Mori J (2009) Temporal variations of the Gutenberg–Richter distribution prior to the Kobe earthquake. Ann Disaster Prev Res Inst 52B:255–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub C, Kahle HG (1997) GPS and geologic estimates of the tectonic activity in the Marmara region, NW Anatolia. J Geophys Res 102:587–27601

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes LR, Quittmeyer R (1981) Repeat times of great earthquakes along simple plate boundaries. Maurice Ewing Ser 4:297–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabban A, Gencoglu S (1975) Earthquake and its parameters. Bull Earthq Res Inst Turkey 11:7–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Taymaz T (1999) Seismotectonics of the Marmara region: source characteristics of 1999 Golcuk–Sapanca–Duzce earthquakes. In: Proceedings of ITU-IAHS, international conference on the Kocaeli earthquake 17 August 1999, Istanbul, Turkey, 2–5 December 1999, pp 55–78

  • Urbancic TI, Trifu CI (1992) Space-time correlations of b value with stress changes associated with the 1999 November 12, Düzce (Turkey) earthquake \((\text{ Mw }=7.1)\). Geophys J Int 153:229–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoback ML (1992) First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: the world stress map project. J Geophys Res 97:11703–11728

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nilgun Sayil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sayil, N. Evaluation of the seismicity for the Marmara region with statistical approaches. Acta Geod Geophys 49, 265–281 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-014-0058-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-014-0058-4

Keywords

Navigation