# Towards computable flows and robust estimates for inf-sup stable FEM applied to the time-dependent incompressible Navier–Stokes equations

- 109 Downloads
- 1 Citations

## Abstract

Inf-sup stable FEM applied to time-dependent incompressible Navier–Stokes flows are considered. The focus lies on robust estimates for the kinetic and dissipation energies in a twofold sense. Firstly, pressure–robustness ensures the fulfilment of a fundamental invariance principle and velocity error estimates are not corrupted by the pressure approximability. Secondly, *Re*-semi-robustness means that constants appearing on the right-hand side of kinetic and dissipation energy error estimates (including Gronwall constants) do not explicitly depend on the Reynolds number. Such estimates rely on the essential regularity assumption \(\nabla u \in L^1(0,T;L^\infty (\varOmega ))\) which is discussed in detail. In the sense of best practice, we review and establish pressure- and *Re*-semi-robust estimates for pointwise divergence-free \(H^1\)-conforming FEM (like Scott–Vogelius pairs or certain isogeometric based FEM) and pointwise divergence-free *H*(div)-conforming discontinuous Galerkin FEM. For convection-dominated problems, the latter naturally includes an upwind stabilisation for the velocity which is not gradient-based.

## Keywords

Time-dependent incompressible flow*Re*-semi-robust error estimates Pressure–robustness Inf-sup stable methods Exactly divergence-free FEM

## Mathematics Subject Classification

35Q30 65M15 65M60 76D17 76M10## References

- 1.Ahmed, N., Linke, A., Merdon, C.: Towards pressure–robust mixed methods for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/cmam-2017-0047
- 2.Arndt, D., Braack, M., Lube, G.: Finite elements for the Navier–Stokes problem with outflow condition. In: Karasözen, B., Manguoğlu, M., Tezer-Sezgin, M., Göktepe, S., Uğur, Ö. (eds.) Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2015. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 112, pp. 95–103. Springer, Cham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Arndt, D., Dallmann, H., Lube, G.: Local projection FEM stabilization for the time-dependent incompressible Navier–Stokes problem. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ.
**31**(4), 1224–1250 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 4.Ascher, U., Ruuth, S., Wetton, B.: Implicit–explicit methods for time-dependent partial differential equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
**32**(3), 797–823 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 5.Bardos, C.W., Titi, E.S.: Mathematics and turbulence: where do we stand? J. Turbul.
**14**(3), 42–76 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.Berselli, L.C., Iliescu, T., Layton, W.J.: Mathematics of Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows. Springer, Berlin (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.Bertoglio, C., Caiazzo, A., Bazilevs, Y., Braack, M., Esmaily, M., Gravemeier, V., Marsden, A., Pironneau, O., Vignon-Clementel, I.E., Wall, W.A.: Benchmark problems for numerical treatment of backflow at open boundaries. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Biomed. Eng.
**34**(2), e2918 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.Bertozzi, A.L.: Heteroclinic orbits and chaotic dynamics in planar fluid flows. SIAM J. Math. Anal.
**19**(6), 1271–1294 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 9.Boffi, D., Brezzi, F., Fortin, M.: Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 10.Boyer, F., Fabrie, P.: Mathematical Tools for the Study of the Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations and Related Models. Springer, New York (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 11.Buffa, A., de Falco, C., Sangalli, G.: IsoGeometric analysis: stable elements for the 2D Stokes equation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
**65**(11–12), 1407–1422 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 12.Burman, E.: Robust error estimates for stabilized finite element approximations of the two dimensional Navier–Stokes equations at high Reynolds number. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
**288**, 2–23 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.Burman, E., Fernández, M.A.: Continuous interior penalty finite element method for the time-dependent Navier–Stokes equations: space discretization and convergence. Numer. Math.
**107**(1), 39–77 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 14.Case, M.A., Ervin, V.J., Linke, A., Rebholz, L.G.: A connection between Scott–Vogelius and grad-div stabilized Taylor–Hood FE approximations of the Navier–Stokes equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
**49**(4), 1461–1481 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 15.Chacón Rebollo, T., Lewandowski, R.: Mathematical and Numerical Foundations of Turbulence Models and Applications. Birkhäuser Basel, New York (2014)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 16.Chrysafinos, K., Hou, L.S.: Analysis and approximations of the evolutionary Stokes equations with inhomogeneous boundary and divergence data using a parabolic saddle point formulation. ESAIM: M2AN
**51**(4), 1501–1526 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 17.Cockburn, B.: Two new techniques for generating exactly incompressible approximate velocities. Comput Fluid Dyn
**2006**, 1–11 (2009)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 18.Cockburn, B.: Static condensation, hybridization, and the devising of the HDG methods. In: Building Bridges: Connections and Challenges in Modern Approaches to Numerical Partial Differential Equations, pp. 129–177. Springer, New York (2016)Google Scholar
- 19.Cockburn, B., Gopalakrishnan, J.: Incompressible finite elements via hybridization. Part I: the Stokes system in two space dimensions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
**43**(4), 1627–1650 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 20.Cockburn, B., Gopalakrishnan, J.: Incompressible finite elements via hybridization. Part II: the Stokes system in three space dimensions. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
**43**(4), 1651–1672 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 21.Cockburn, B., Gopalakrishnan, J.: The derivation of hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin methods for Stokes flow. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
**47**(2), 1092–1125 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 22.Cockburn, B., Gopalakrishnan, J., Lazarov, R.: Unified hybridization of discontinuous Galerkin, mixed, and continuous Galerkin methods for second order elliptic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
**47**(2), 1319–1365 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 23.Cockburn, B., Kanschat, G., Schötzau, D.: A note on discontinuous Galerkin divergence-free solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. J. Sci. Comput.
**31**(1–2), 61–73 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 24.Cousins, B.R., Le Borne, S., Linke, A., Rebholz, L.G., Wang, Z.: Efficient linear solvers for incompressible flow simulations using Scott–Vogelius finite elements. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ.
**29**(4), 1217–1237 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 25.Dallmann, H., Arndt, D.: Stabilized finite element methods for the Oberbeck–Boussinesq model. J. Sci. Comput.
**69**(1), 244–273 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 26.Di Pietro, D.A., Ern, A.: Mathematical Aspects of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 27.Durst, F.: Fluid Mechanics: An Introduction to the Theory of Fluid Flows. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 28.Ern, A., Guermond, J.L.: Theory and Practice of Finite Elements. Springer, New York (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 29.Evans, J.A.: Divergence-free B-spline discretizations for viscous incompressible flows. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin (2011)Google Scholar
- 30.Evans, J.A., Hughes, T.J.R.: Isogeometric divergence-conforming B-splines for the steady Navier–Stokes equations. Math. Model Methods Appl. Sci.
**23**(8), 1421–1478 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 31.Evans, J.A., Hughes, T.J.R.: Isogeometric divergence-conforming B-splines for the unsteady Navier–Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys.
**241**, 141–167 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 32.de Frutos, J., García-Archilla, B., John, V., Novo, J.: Semi-robust local projection stabilization for non inf-sup stable discretizations of the evolutionary Navier–Stokes equations. arXiv:1709.01011 [math.NA] (2017)
- 33.de Frutos, J., García-Archilla, B., John, V., Novo, J.: Analysis of the grad-div stabilization for the time-dependent Navier–Stokes equations with inf-sup stable finite elements. Adv. Comput. Math.
**44**(1), 195–225 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 34.Girault, V., Nochetto, R.H., Scott, L.R.: Max-norm estimates for Stokes and Navier–Stokes approximations in convex polyhedra. Numer. Math.
**131**(4), 771–822 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 35.Guzmán, J., Shu, C.W., Sequeira, F.A.: H(div) conforming and DG methods for incompressible Euler’s equations. IMA J. Numer. Anal.
**37**(4), 1733–1771 (2017)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 36.Henshaw, W.D., Kreiss, H.O., Reyna, L.G.: Smallest scale estimates for the Navier–Stokes equations for incompressible fluids. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.
**112**(1), 21–44 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 37.Hesthaven, J.S., Warburton, T.: Nodal Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Algorithms, Analysis, and Applications. Springer, New York (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 38.Jenkins, E.W., John, V., Linke, A., Rebholz, L.G.: On the parameter choice in grad-div stabilization for the Stokes equations. Adv. Comput. Math.
**40**(2), 491–516 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 39.John, V.: Finite Element Methods for Incompressible Flow Problems. Springer, New York (2016)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 40.John, V., Knobloch, P., Novo, J.: Finite elements for scalar convection-dominated equations and incompressible flow problems: a never ending story? Comput. Vis. Sci. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00791-018-0290-5
- 41.John, V., Linke, A., Merdon, C., Neilan, M., Rebholz, L.G.: On the divergence constraint in mixed finite element methods for incompressible flows. SIAM Rev.
**59**(3), 492–544 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 42.Lederer, P.L., Lehrenfeld, C., Schöberl, J.: Hybrid discontinuous Galerkin methods with relaxed H(div)-conformity for incompressible flows. Part I. (2017). arXiv:1707.02782 [math.NA]
- 43.Lederer, P.L., Linke, A., Merdon, C., Schöberl, J.: Divergence-free reconstruction operators for pressure–robust Stokes discretizations with continuous pressure finite elements. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
**55**(3), 1291–1314 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 44.Lederer, P.L., Schöberl, J.: Polynomial robust stability analysis for \(H(\operatorname{div})\)-conforming finite elements for the Stokes equations. IMA J. Numer. Anal. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/drx051
- 45.Lehrenfeld, C.: Hybrid discontinuous Galerkin methods for solving incompressible flow problems. Master’s thesis, RWTH Aachen (2010)Google Scholar
- 46.Lehrenfeld, C., Schöberl, J.: High order exactly divergence-free hybrid discontinuous Galerkin methods for unsteady incompressible flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
**307**, 339–361 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 47.Linke, A.: On the role of the Helmholtz decomposition in mixed methods for incompressible flows and a new variational crime. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
**268**, 782–800 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 48.Linke, A., Matthies, G., Tobiska, L.: Robust arbitrary order mixed finite element methods for the incompressible Stokes equations with pressure independent velocity errors. ESAIM: M2AN
**50**(1), 289–309 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 49.Linke, A., Merdon, C.: On velocity errors due to irrotational forces in the Navier–Stokes momentum balance. J. Comput. Phys.
**313**, 654–661 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 50.Linke, A., Merdon, C.: Pressure–robustness and discrete Helmholtz projectors in mixed finite element methods for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
**311**, 304–326 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 51.Lube, G., Arndt, D., Dallmann, H.: Understanding the limits of inf-sup stable Galerkin-FEM for incompressible flows. In: Knobloch, P. (ed.) Boundary and Interior Layers, Computational and Asymptotic Methods—BAIL 2014. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 108, pp. 147–169. Springer, Cham (2015)Google Scholar
- 52.Majda, A.J., Bertozzi, A.L.: Vorticity and Incompressible Flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 53.Natale, A., Cotter, C.J.: A variational H(div) finite-element discretization approach for perfect incompressible fluids. IMA J. Numer. Anal. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/drx033
- 54.Oberai, A.A., Liu, J., Sondak, D., Hughes, T.J.R.: A residual based eddy viscosity model for the large eddy simulation of turbulent flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
**282**, 54–70 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 55.Oikawa, I.: A hybridized discontinuous Galerkin method with reduced stabilization. J. Sci. Comput.
**65**(1), 327–340 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 56.Oikawa, I.: Analysis of a reduced-order HDG method for the Stokes equations. J. Sci. Comput.
**67**(2), 475–492 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 57.Rhebergen, S., Wells, G.N.: Analysis of a hybridized/interface stabilized finite element method for the Stokes equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.
**55**(4), 1982–2003 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 58.Rhebergen, S., Wells, G.N.: A hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for the Navier-Stokes equations with pointwise divergence-free velocity field. J. Sci. Comput. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-018-0671-4
- 59.Rivière, B.: Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Elliptic and Parabolic Equations. SIAM (2008)Google Scholar
- 60.Roos, H.G., Stynes, M., Tobiska, L.: Robust Numerical Methods for Singularly Perturbed Differential Equations: Convection-Diffusion-Reaction and Flow Problems, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 61.Schlichting, H., Gersten, K.: Boundary-Layer Theory, 8th edn. Springer, Berlin (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 62.Schöberl, J.: C++11 Implementation of Finite Elements in NGSolve. ASC Report 30/2014, Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology (2014). https://www.asc.tuwien.ac.at/~schoeberl/wiki/publications/ngs-cpp11.pdf
- 63.Schöberl, J., Zaglmayr, S.: High order Nédélec elements with local complete sequence properties. COMPEL
**24**(2), 374–384 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 64.Schroeder, P.W., Lube, G.: Divergence-free H(div)-FEM for time-dependent incompressible flows with applications to high Reynolds number vortex dynamics. J. Sci. Comput.
**75**(2), 830–858 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 65.Schroeder, P.W., Lube, G.: Pressure–robust analysis of divergence-free and conforming FEM for evolutionary incompressible Navier–Stokes flows. J. Numer. Math.
**25**(4), 249–276 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 66.Tritton, D.J.: Physical Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York (1988)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 67.Zaglmayr, S.: High Order Finite Element Methods for Electromagnetic Field Computation. Ph.D. thesis, Johannes Kepler University Linz (2006)Google Scholar