Skip to main content
Log in

Constructive characterization of Runge–Kutta methods that satisfy the M-condition

  • Published:
SeMA Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A constructive characterization of the class of Runge–Kutta methods that satisfy the M-condition is presented. Such characterization describes a method in terms of a skew symmetric matrix \(\Sigma \) and the coefficient vector b instead of the standard Butcher parameters (Ab) and is based on the simplifying assumptions satisfied by the method and its associated quadrature formula. By using the new parameters we are able to classify easily all M-methods of a given number of stages according to their order and the simplifying conditions. The cases with \(s=2,3\) and 4 stages are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is assumed that the quadrature formula is \(\int _0^1 g(t) \mathrm{d}t \simeq \sum _{i=1}^s b_i g(c_i)\).

References

  1. Butcher, J.C.: The Numerical Analysis of Ordinary Differential Equations. Wiley, New York (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Burrage, K.: High order algebraically stable Runge–Kutta methods. BIT 18, 373–383 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan, R.: On symmetric Runge–Kutta methods of high order. Computing 45, 301–390 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan, R.P.K., Chartier, P.: Classification of high-order implicit Runge–Kutta methods. N. Z. J. Math. 29(2), 151–167 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, G.J.: Stability of Runge–Kutta methods for trajectory problems. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 7, 1–13 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hairer, E., Wanner, G.: Solving Ordinary Differential Equations II, Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems. Springer, Berlin (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hairer, E., Wanner, G.: Symplectic Runge–Kutta methods with real eigenvalues. BIT 34, 310–312 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hairer, E., Lubich, C., Wanner, G.: Geometric Numerical Integration. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Iserles, A.: Efficient Runge–Kutta methods for Hamiltonian equations. Bull. Greek Math. Soc. 32, 1098–1108 (1991)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, F., Mengzhao, Q.: Symplectic Geometric Algorithms for Hamiltonian Systems. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Min, L., Aiguo, X.: Characterizations and construction of Poisson/symplectic and symmetric multi-revolution implicit Runge–Kutta methods of high order. Appl. Numer. Math. 58(6), 915–930 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Saito, S., Sugiura, H., Mitsui, T.: Butcher’s simplifying assumption for symplectic integrators. BIT 32, 345–349 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Saito, S., Sugiura, H., Mitsui, T.: Family of symplectic implicit Runge–Kutta formulae. BIT 32, 539–543 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanz-Serna, J.M., Abia, L.: Order conditions for canonical Runge–Kutta schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 29, 1080–1095 (1991)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanz-Serna, J.M., Calvo, M.P.: Numerical Hamiltonian Problems. Chapman and Hall, London (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun, G.: Construction of high order symplectic Runge–Kutta methods. J. Comput. Math. 11, 250–260 (1993)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wensheng, T., Yajuan, S.: Construction of Runge–Kutta type methods for solving ordinary differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 234(15), 179–191 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Wensheng, T., Guangming, L., Xuqiong, L.: Construction of symplectic (partitioned) Runge–Kutta methods with continuous stage (2015). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1504.04791.pdf

  19. Xiaohua, D., Jiabo, T.: Implicit Runge–Kutta methods based on Radau quadrature formula. Int. J. Comput. Math. 86(8), 1394–1404 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. I. Montijano.

Additional information

This work was supported by project MTM2013-47318-C2-1-P.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calvo, M., Montijano, J.I. & Rández, L. Constructive characterization of Runge–Kutta methods that satisfy the M-condition. SeMA 74, 345–359 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40324-017-0126-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40324-017-0126-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation