Cross-Border Cooperation in the Euro-Mediterranean and Beyond: Between Policy Transfers and Regional Adaptations

  • Filippo CelataEmail author
  • Raffaella Coletti


Since 2007, the Euro-Mediterranean area has been included among the mesoregions covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP). Such a choice has not been exempted from criticisms, insofar as the geographical coverage of the “European Neighbourhood” has been judged too wide and too diverse to be the object of a single policy. The aims and scope of the European Union’s strategies towards Mediterranean countries, moreover, are different from those towards the Eastern European Countries, while policy instruments, implementation procedures and political narratives are more or the less the same. The paper addresses the case of one of those policy instruments: Cross-Border Cooperation, an important component of the ENP; it presents a comparative analysis of Cross-Border Cooperation initiatives in the Euro-Mediterranean area vis-à-vis similar initiatives launched in other ENP’s mesoregions. The implementation of the policy, it is argued, is based indeed upon a mixture of policy transfers and local adaptations, and produces both homogenizations and differentiations. The aim of the paper is to see how a single policy instrument (Cross-Border Cooperation within the ENP) is adapted to the specificities of each mesoregion, what kind of regionalization and bordering/cross-bordering processes it produces, and what role the Euro-Mediterranean area is supposed to play in this frame.


European Neighbourhood Policy Cross-Border Cooperation Euro-Mediterranean area European Union 



We acknowledge the financial support of the European Union Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007–2013, Grant Agreement no. 266920: EUROBORDERREGIONS. European Regions, EU External Borders and the Immediate Neighbours. Analysing Regional Development Options through Policies and Practices of Cross-Border Co-operation. The EC is not liable for any use that can be made on the information contained herein.


  1. Aliboni R (2005) The geopolitical implications of the European neighbourhood policy. Eur Foreign Aff Rev 10:1–16Google Scholar
  2. Axford B (2006) The dialectic of borders and networks in Europe: reviewing topological presuppositions. Comp Eur Polit 4(2–3):160–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck U, Grande E (2007) Cosmopolitan Europe. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg E, Ehin P (2006) What kind of border regime is in the making? Towards a differentiated and uneven border strategy. Coop Confl 41(1):53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bialasiewicz L et al (2009) Interventions in the new political geographies of the European ‘neighborhood’. Polit Geogr 28:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boeteldje F, Van Houtum H (2011) Introduction to a special section and brussels is speaking: the adverse speech geo-politics of the European Union towards its neighbours. Geopolitics 16(1):121–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browning C, Joenniemi P (2008) Geostrategies of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Eur J Int Relat 14(3):519–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Celata F (2012) Free Trade Area. In: Giaccaria P, Paradiso M (eds) Mediterranean Lexicon. SGI, Roma, pp 329–345Google Scholar
  9. Celata F, Coletti R (2011) Le funzioni narrative dei confini nelle politiche di cooperazione transfrontaliera in Europa. Rivista Geografica Italiana 118(2):219–245Google Scholar
  10. Cremona M, Hillion C (2006) L’Union fait la force? Potential and limitations of the European Neighbourhood Policy as an Integrated EU Foreign and Security Policy. European University Institute Working Papers 2006/39Google Scholar
  11. Del Sarto R, Schumacher T (2005) From EMP to ENP: what’s at stake with the European Neighbourhood Policy towards the southern Mediterranean? Eur Foreign Aff Rev 10(1):17–38Google Scholar
  12. Dimitrovova B (2010a) Cultural bordering and re-bordering in the EU’s Neighbourhood: members, strangers or neighbours? J Contemp Eur Stud 18(4):463–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dimitrovova B (2010b) Remaking Europe borders through the European Neighbourhood Policy. CEPS Working Document No 327/March 2010. Accessed 15 October 2012.
  14. Emerson M (2011) Just good friends? The European Union’s Multiple Neighbourhood Policies. Int Spect 46(4):45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. European Commission (2007) ENPI Cross-Border Cooperation Strategy Paper 2007–2013. Accessed 15 October 2012.
  16. European Commission (2011a) A partnership for democracy and shared prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean. EC Communication 8.3.2011, COM (2011) 200. Accessed 29 October 2012.
  17. European Commission (2011b) A new response to a changing neighbourhood. A review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Accessed 29 October 2012.
  18. European Parliament (2007) Motion for a European Parliament Resolution on strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy—report 26 October 2007 A6-0414-2007. (Accessed 15 October 2012.
  19. Gawrich A, Melnykovska I, Schweickert R (2010) Neighbourhood Europeanization through ENPI: the case of Ukraine. J Common Market Stud 48(5):1209–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelley J (2006) New wine in old wineskins: policy adaptation in the European Neighbourhood Policy. J Common Market Stud 44(1):29–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lavenex S (2004) EU external governance in wider Europe. J Eur Public Policy 11(4):680–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynch D (2005) The security dimension of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Int Spect 1:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Perkmann M (2007) Construction of new territorial scales: a framework and case study of the EUREGIO cross-border region. Reg Stud 41(2):253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Popescu G (2008) The conflicting logics of cross-border reterritorialization: geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Polit Geogr 27:418–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Walters W (2006) Rethinking borders beyond the state. Comp Eur Polit 4(2–3):141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zaiotti R (2007) Of friends and fences: Europe’s Neighbourhood Policy and the ‘Gated Community Syndrome’. J Eur Integr 29(2):143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EMUNI 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Memotef DepartmentUniversity of Rome La SapienzaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations