-
1.
Article 102 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the adoption and implementation of rules by associations which are responsible for football at world and European levels and which pursue in parallel various economic activities related to the organisation of competitions, making subject to their prior approval the setting up, on European Union territory, of a new interclub football competition by a third-party undertaking, and controlling the participation of professional football clubs and players in such a competition, on pain of sanctions, where there is no framework for those various powers providing for substantive criteria and detailed procedural rules suitable for ensuring that they are transparent, objective, non-discriminatory and proportionate, constitutes abuse of a dominant position.
-
2.
Article 101(1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the adoption and implementation, directly or through their member national football associations, of rules by associations which are responsible for football at world and European levels and which pursue in parallel various economic activities related to the organisation of competitions, making subject to their prior approval the setting up, on European Union territory, of a new interclub football competition by a third-party undertaking, and controlling the participation of professional football clubs and players in such a competition, on pain of sanctions, where there is no framework for those various powers providing for substantive criteria and detailed procedural rules suitable for ensuring that they are transparent, objective, non-discriminatory and proportionate, constitutes a decision by an association of undertakings having as its object the prevention of competition.
-
3.
Article 101(3) and Article 102 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that rules by which associations which are responsible for football at world and European levels and which pursue in parallel various economic activities related to the organisation of competitions make subject to their prior approval the setting up, on European Union territory, of interclub football competitions by a third-party undertaking, and control the participation of professional football clubs and players in such competitions, on pain of sanctions, may benefit from an exemption to the application of Article 101(1) TFEU or be considered justified under Article 102 TFEU only if it is demonstrated, through convincing arguments and evidence, that all of the conditions required for those purposes are satisfied.
-
4.
Articles 101 and 102 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding rules laid down by associations which are responsible for football at world and European levels and which pursue in parallel various economic activities related to the organisation of competitions, inasmuch as they designate those associations as being the original owners of all of the rights emanating from competitions coming under their ‘jurisdiction’, where those rules apply only to competitions organised by those associations, to the exclusion of those which might be organised by third-party entities or undertakings; precluding such rules in so far as they confer on those same associations an exclusive power relating to the marketing of the rights at issue, unless it is demonstrated, through convincing arguments and evidence, that all the conditions required in order for those rules to benefit, under Article 101(3) TFEU, from an exemption to the application of Article 101(1) TFEU and be considered justified under Article 102 TFEU are satisfied.
-
5.
Article 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding rules by which associations which are responsible for football at world and European levels and which pursue in parallel various economic activities related to the organisation of competitions make subject to their prior approval the setting up, on European Union territory, of interclub football competitions by a third-party undertaking, and control the participation of professional football clubs and players in such competitions, on pain of sanctions, where there is no framework for those rules providing for substantive criteria and detailed procedural rules suitable for ensuring that they are transparent, objective, non-discriminatory and proportionate.
Author information
Consortia
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Available at http://curia.europa.eu. Official wording of the Court.
For more on this topic, see the CJEU decision “Royal Antwerp Football Club” in this issue of IIC at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01483-3. See also the editorial by Sandra Marco Colino “Sports and Competition Law: A Not-So-Special Relationship?” in IIC issue 5/2024 at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01485-1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
European Superleague Company SL v. Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) TFEU, Arts. 56, 101(1) and (3), 102. “European Superleague Company”. IIC (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01484-2
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01484-2
Keywords
- Internal market
- International sports associations
- Professional football
- Private law entities
- Regulatory, control and decision-making powers, and the power to impose sanctions
- Prior approval of and participation in competitions
- Exploitation of commercial and media rights related to those competitions
- Parallel pursuit of economic activities
- Decision adversely affecting competition
- Anticompetitive “object” and “effect”
- Abuse of dominant position
- Justification
- Restriction on the freedom to provide services
- Exception
- Burden of proof