Skip to main content
Log in

“Tirol”

Decision of the Supreme Court of Austria (Oberster Gerichtshof) 25 January 2022 – Case No. 4 Ob 156/21a; ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2022:0040OB00156.21A.0125.000

  • Decision • Unfair Competition
  • Austria
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  1. 1.

    The continued use of a logo after the expiry of the licence agreement with the proprietor of the trade mark is misleading and therefore inadmissible, irrespective of whether the licence requirements are still fulfilled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Headnote based on official wording of the Court’s press release. Translated from the German by Pedro Henrique D. Batista.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Act against Unfair Competition, Secs. 1, 2, 2a; Annex of the Act against Unfair Competition, Sec. Z 2. “Tirol”. IIC 54, 343–346 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01290-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01290-2

Keywords

Navigation