Skip to main content
Log in

“Baltijas Starptautiskā Akadēmija”

Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 13 October 2022 – Joined Cases Nos. C-164/21 and C-318/21; ECLI:EU:C:2022:785

  • Decision • Restraints of Competition
  • European Union
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  1. 1.

    Article 2(83) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 [TFEU] must be interpreted as meaning that an entity organised under private law which carries out several activities, including research, but the majority of whose revenue comes from economic activities, such as the provision of teaching services for consideration, may be regarded as being a ‘research and knowledge-dissemination organisation’, within the meaning of that provision, provided that it can be established, in the light of all the relevant circumstances of the case, that its primary goal is to conduct, in complete independence, activities of fundamental research, industrial research or experimental development, possibly supplemented by activities for the dissemination of the results of those research activities, by means of teaching, publications or transfers of knowledge. In that context, such an entity cannot be required to earn a certain proportion of its revenue from its non-economic activities of research and dissemination of knowledge.

  2. 2.

    Article 2(83) of Regulation No 651/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that, in order for an entity to be regarded as a ‘research and knowledge-dissemination organisation’, within the meaning of that provision, it is not necessary that that entity reinvests the revenue generated by its primary activity in that same primary activity.

  3. 3.

    Article 2(83) of Regulation No 651/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that the legal status of the shareholders and members of an entity and the possible profit-making nature of the activities carried out by them and of the objectives which they pursue do not constitute decisive criteria for the purposes of classifying that entity as a ‘research and knowledge-dissemination organisation’, within the meaning of that provision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Available at http://curia.europa.eu. Official wording of the Court.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

“Baltijas Starptautiskā Akadēmija” SIA (C-164/21), “Stockholm School of Economics in Riga” SIA (C-318/21) v. Latvijas Zinātnes padome Regulation (EU) No. 651/2014, Art. 2(83). “Baltijas Starptautiskā Akadēmija”. IIC 54, 158–159 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01275-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01275-7

Keywords

Navigation